Dear Mike,
Let me get right to the point since I know you are in the weeds a little right now.
Yesterday “moderate” Senator “Lex” Lugar broke with the Administration and it looks like the wheels on the “stay the course” bandwagon you have placed Congressman on are getting a little wobbly.
I know you don’t want your boy Castle to be the only supporter Bush has left come this time next year and it is getting hot for fake moderates, so I was wondering how that blistering attack on the President’s malfeasance you are working on is going?
You know that fictional blistering attack that Castle alludes to from time to time. How close you would say it is?
Just Curious.
Your fan,
Jason
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Motsmitty is calling me out. I know someone who can clear up this mess…
Morning Mike!
I know you can’t turn a battleship on a dime, so while I wait for your statement in which Congressman Useless – I mean Castle – makes a clean and unequivocal break with President Bush regarding his 50 year timeline for withdrawal from Iraq I have another question.
My friend, MOTsmitty, says that says that your boy Castle had nothing to do with stopping Jan Ting’s foaming-at-the-mouth-anti-immigrant resolution from coming to a vote at the DEGOP convention. But I heard that it was Castle (or maybe you, since you do all the heavy lifting in the office) who put the put the kibosh on the resolution.
Can you clear this up for us? I understand that Castle’s Bush love on this issue puts you at odds with most Republicans, so you probably don’t want to come right out and say anything directly. That’s cool. I’ll accept your silence on this topic as an acknowledgement that – YES, IT WAS CASTLE THAT NIXED THE RESOLUTION. So don’t get back to me by this time tomorrow and we’ll consider this question answered.
Okay?
Yours truly,
Jason
PS: What do you make of that Terry Strine lying to the Washington Times about it? What a douche bag, eh?