Paul Clark Swears Up And Down That He Has “No Conflict of Interest”
Then, in a email to developers from his wife’s law firm he told his developers buddies to not worry. (end snark)
Connect
Connect with us on the following social media platforms.
I’m sure Nancy will beat me about the head for this, but I sort of feel bad for the guy. If I had to OK development or get no sex, you guys would be looking at a large enough installation of asphalt that it could be seen from space.
Lol. I think that might be a thread killer. There is nowhere to go from here.
🙂
I am going to enjoy being in Council Chambers this evening. There is not only the Clark WHAAA factor when the Resolution comes for a vote, there is a vote on whether Claymont’s Renaissance should be given a special tax bonding arrangement and Pam Scott-Paul Clarky will be presenting her four-year plan to develop the lands that (would have helped)inform us of the Revolutionary Battle of Cooch’s Bridge….way to go Saul Ewing lawyer.
Instead of allowing the public to purchase this property, Scott-Clarky is going for the throat of the people who want to preserve this PROTECTED heritage land by Chancery Court lawsuits and, yeah, homestyle cat-o-nines scenarios.