QOTE

Filed in National by on October 23, 2008

Which theory do you think is less dangerous to be taught in schools:  Creationism? or Conservatism?

About the Author ()

hiding in the open

Comments (7)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. delawaredem says:

    Less Dangerous? Conservatism. At least conservatism is a real political ideology based in reality, even though it is wrong. Creationism is just a story.

  2. Donsquishy says:

    did you answer the question counsel?

  3. Unstable Isotope says:

    Conservatism.

    Creationism is a myth taught as fact. That’s much more dangerous.

  4. cassandra_m says:

    In the right context, I don’t see either as especially dangerous — Conservatism has multiple historical faces and in Europe is something fairly different than here. All of those (along with other philosophies of governing) in a PoliSci or History course don’t seem all that dangerous.

    Creationism in a Philosophy or religion class as an alternative — Not Science — explanation of the world’s creation seems fine too. As UI notes, move creationism to a real science class and now you’ve gotten to the dangerous territory.

  5. anonone says:

    Both:

    Conservatism is delusion presented as reality.

  6. Nancy Willing says:

    You can grow beyond being taught creationism. Can you grow behond being taught Conservatism (neo-con version, natch)?