Kavips Proves Open & Shut Case of Fraud in the 29th: Paradee Wins
This is as good blogging as we’ve ever seen in Delaware. Kavips calmly, clearly, and absoultly proves that the Thornburgh recount was rigged.
Not only has Paradee won this election, but someone should be going to jail by the time this is all done.
What it suggests is that the Thornburg-Paradee race may have been the only race in the district that was called accurately, and that it took a manual recount to do it.
I think Kavips makes a better case than you do.
I’m not fully sure of either side’s arguments at this point. Has anyone done a story that deals with the claims from both sides in a tick-tock fashion?
“I think Kavips makes a better case than you do.”
How so?
You don’t make a case. You offer your opinion.
Al,
I think conventional wisdom at the NJ and DSN has firmed up around the Dep of Elections face saving explaination.
I haven’t seen any explanation of what was found, what was recorded, etc. I gather it will be sorted out in court, but I’m not even sure what they’re sorting out.
Dave, do you have a link to anything?
I will take a stab at what I think kavips is saying:
He is saying that the absentee ballot totals look suspicious. The total for president, for example, is suspiciously low compared to the other races. I think he believes that ballots were “misplaced.”
It is my understanding that the machines read the absentees wrong.
NJ and DSN has firmed up around the Dep of Elections face saving explaination.
*
YUP! this is terrible. I have some emails from Ms. Manlove post-primary where she was mostly taking me to task for publishing inquiring posts on my blog. Inquiries with premises that panned out to a degree.
‘Question Authority’ is still my favorite democratic expression. She had ought to dismiss her notion that honest inquiry into election results is not hysterical nonsense but a fucking civil right.