Deep Vanity Thought

Filed in National by on February 13, 2009

This kind of thing could start to get on the nerves of the people who actually do the work at the Ins. Commission.

About the Author ()

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

Comments (29)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Reis says:
    February 13, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    The picture is empty. There’s nothing there. Nothing at all. A complete void. Perfect vacuum.

  2. jason330 says:
    February 13, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    What OS are you on? We’re having glitches which I blame on George W. Bush.

  3. Mike Matthews says:
    February 13, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    I can’t see it, either. I’m on Firefox.

  4. jason330 says:
    February 13, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    both of my past posts don’t show up on my firefox.

    Hmmm? Oh well. Crappy cut and paste blogging will resume at some point.

  5. Mike Matthews says:
    February 13, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    OK, just tried to access from IE and I’m getting a red-x now. I think it’s because it’s a TIFF file. Try and do it as JPEG.

  6. nemski says:
    February 13, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    What the hell is with the TIFF files Jason? You goatf**cker.

  7. Delaware Dem says:
    February 13, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    I will fix it.

  8. Gabriel says:
    February 13, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    Go to http://www.delawareinsurance.gov. That brings up the home page. The swearing in photo that’s been on there since January 6 has now been enhanced with a long story about her. Other than that, nothing else was posted in the month and half since that moron took over the office.

    She obviously doesn’t give a damn about consumers. Surprise, surprise. I feel sorry for the poor workers who have to tolerate her. Maybe if she keeps it up they’ll revolt. A mutiny…what a nice thought.

  9. Delaware Dem says:
    February 13, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    Fixed.

  10. anonone says:
    February 13, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    Mike Matthews posted a link to her campaign finance report a while back. She spent something over $70k on her campaign without reporting a single expenditure over $100.

    How does one do that? Why does one do that? And who are the people that loaned her money and why hasn’t she paid them back?

    Anybody who wants to sink this lady’s boat just needs to follow the money.

  11. liz says:
    February 13, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    Thats not legal, but then whose asking?

  12. David says:
    February 13, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    Why are you picking on KWS? Is it because she wasn’t your pick? She hasn’t had a chance to do anything wrong. You have a problem with the web site having a relevant post about the new commissioner. That seems like information which is useful to the public.

    One thing for sure, she will screw up less than Denn. It is nice to have a real professional in the office who understands underwriting more than politics and pr.

  13. PI says:
    February 13, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    Let’s see, she had yard signs and bus signs and literature. Any one of those costs more than $100. Someone needs to investigate this woman.

  14. jason330 says:
    February 13, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    David,

    FYI. This sentence identifies you as a nit wit.

    One thing for sure, she will screw up less than Denn.

  15. Gabriel says:
    February 13, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    Hello David…uh…I mean Elliott. Still up and at the lies, I see.

  16. PI says:
    February 13, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    The following list is copied from one of her campaign finance reports. Scroll through it and see the expenditure for EZ Pass…….SHE DOESN’T EVEN OWN A CAR!

    Account Number: ****** Reporting Period: 08/11/2008 09/01/2008
    FROM TO
    Itemize all expenditures over $100 for the reporting period. All expenditures to Political Committees must be itemized, regardless of the amount. NOTE: IF you expend funds to the same person or organization several times
    during the reporting period, each item must be listed if the aggregate amount is over $100, even if the individual amounts are not.
    EXPENDITURES IN EXCESS OF $100:
    Date Expended Payee Name Payee Mailing Address Aggregate Amount Amount Expended
    08/11/2008 Direct Media 240 N. James St., Newport, DE 19804 $8,295.00 $3,295.00
    08/11/2008 Direct Media 240 N. James St., Newport DE 19804 $10,272.00 $1,975.00
    08/11/2008 Don Faucher Wilmington, Delaware $350.00 $350.00
    08/11/2008 Elliott Jacobson Washington, D.C. $4,001.26 $423.19
    08/11/2008 EZPASS Delaware Dover, Delaware $125.00 $50.00
    08/11/2008 US Postal Service New Castle, Delaware $961.96 $16.91
    08/30/2008 US Postal Service New Castle, Delaware $1,062.87 $100.91
    TOTAL EXPENDITURES IN EXCESS OF $100 $6,211.01
    TOTAL EXPENDITURES NOT IN EXCESS OF $100 $217.25
    GRAND TOTAL EXPENDITURES
    (TOTAL SHOULD ALSO APPEAR ON PAGE 2, STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT BALANCE, ITEM 3F)
    $6,428.26

  17. Gabriel says:
    February 13, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    Hm….guess I was wrong about your identity. What do you have against Matt Denn? He set a “higher standard” of the kind this self-aggrandizing uneducated b…ch couldn’t even spell, let alone implement. Are you on her payroll, too?

  18. Gabriel says:
    February 13, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    PI…she doesn’t own a car because she’s been unemployed for the last 8-10 years. The few retail sales jobs she had pay minimum wage. Elliott’s story about her wrecking it in an accident is bogus.

  19. anon2700 says:
    February 13, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    Gabriel,

    Do you have any proof of the stuff you claim about KWS? Any documents, sworn statements, anything?

    I’m not being facetious, just honestly curious.

    It seems that the sheer volume of anti-KWS’ians would have SOMEthing concrete to back up their statements.

  20. Gabriel says:
    February 13, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    Yes I do. I wouldn’t just make idle allegations. Now think about what you said…”the sheer volume of anti-KWS’ians”. That alone should prove to you that what I’ve been saying is valid, otherwise I’d be a lone voice out here.

    You can also have her produce proof of what she claimed and still claims about herself. No one bothered with that during the campaign even though there was plenty of evidence to the contrary.

  21. David says:
    February 13, 2009 at 7:24 pm

    Hey, I voted for John Brady, but I am willing to give her and Jack Markell a chance. I am still willing to give Matt Denn one too, but he is concerning me.

    Forgive me when I laugh at the people who torpedoed Gene Reed complain about someone else. KWS knows the business. If she succeeds, I will be happy. If she doesn’t, I will be happy to have Donna Stone take her place in 4 years.

  22. anon2700 says:
    February 13, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    I heard a lot during the campaign about this type of stuff, but not a single solitary person came forward with any sort of evidence. Instead, we got stupid made-up junk from the Log Cabin Republicans.

    If anyone has evidence, fax it to TNJ or WDEL, scan and e-mail it to DL, DWA, DP… I’m sure they’d be more than happy to write about it.

    I’m just skeptical of people who claim things and can’t back it up. It’s kind of hard to prove a negative. (e.g., “I don’t work for Lowe’s.”)

    Gabriel wrote: “Now think about what you said…”the sheer volume of anti-KWS’ians”. That alone should prove to you that what I’ve been saying is valid, otherwise I’d be a lone voice out here.”

    Actually, it proves nothing. It could prove sockpuppetry. It could prove that a lot of people hate her guts and are willing to make shit up. I’m not saying either of those are the case, but noise and numbers do not equal truth!

  23. Suzanne says:
    February 13, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    “…It is nice to have a real professional in the office …”

    This must be the joke of the day

  24. anonone says:
    February 13, 2009 at 9:45 pm

    Here is the link to her last campaign finance report (hat tip to Mike Matthews):

    http://denver.state.de.us/COE/cfishome.nsf/vwElectionData/STEWARTK!-08-CAN-YRE-YREND.pdf/$File/STEWARTK!-08-CAN-YRE-YREND.pdf?openelement

    It also shows that:

    Daniel Harkins 7 Rolling Road,
    Claymont, DE

    Loaned her $10,000.00 unsecured at 0% interest on 12/18/08 (after the election).

    Who dat?

  25. hero worship says:
    February 13, 2009 at 9:53 pm

    hmmmm, why do I get the feeling that Jason posted this non-post because he missed Gabby and PI. Is this nonsense the only way to get them to come around?
    KWS.Haters.Hits.Desparate.Much?

  26. Gabriel says:
    February 14, 2009 at 1:13 am

    I see Nancy Willing is back. The eternal KWS supporter despite all the evidence.

  27. hero worship says:
    February 14, 2009 at 5:32 am

    oh my, I thought the new rules prevented such ‘outings’ gabby. tsk tsk.

  28. pandora says:
    February 14, 2009 at 8:56 am

    You’re wrong, Gabriel, that’s not Nancy (just like David wasn’t Elliot). Anon2700 has a point.

  29. Gabriel says:
    February 14, 2009 at 10:49 am

    “Gabby” was originally Nancy’s name for me.

    It’s strange that now when you can all see that what I’ve said all along is true because of the way KWS conducts herself, you’re suddenly doubting it? I have first-hand information because I’ve known her a long time and she knows me and knows that what I say is true. She just won’t admit it because that would fly in the face of all her outrageous claims about herself. I can’t get her employment or school records or her income tax returns for her non-business “The Weldin Group,” if she even filed any, nor can I sit her down with a pencil in hand and ask her to write a paragraph on any topic or speak without someone having written the text for her. There are people who can, however. And they will soon enough, when KWS provides them with a reason.

«
»