Deep Vanity Thought
This kind of thing could start to get on the nerves of the people who actually do the work at the Ins. Commission.
Connect
Connect with us on the following social media platforms.
This kind of thing could start to get on the nerves of the people who actually do the work at the Ins. Commission.
Connect with us on the following social media platforms.
The picture is empty. There’s nothing there. Nothing at all. A complete void. Perfect vacuum.
What OS are you on? We’re having glitches which I blame on George W. Bush.
I can’t see it, either. I’m on Firefox.
both of my past posts don’t show up on my firefox.
Hmmm? Oh well. Crappy cut and paste blogging will resume at some point.
OK, just tried to access from IE and I’m getting a red-x now. I think it’s because it’s a TIFF file. Try and do it as JPEG.
What the hell is with the TIFF files Jason? You goatf**cker.
I will fix it.
Go to http://www.delawareinsurance.gov. That brings up the home page. The swearing in photo that’s been on there since January 6 has now been enhanced with a long story about her. Other than that, nothing else was posted in the month and half since that moron took over the office.
She obviously doesn’t give a damn about consumers. Surprise, surprise. I feel sorry for the poor workers who have to tolerate her. Maybe if she keeps it up they’ll revolt. A mutiny…what a nice thought.
Fixed.
Mike Matthews posted a link to her campaign finance report a while back. She spent something over $70k on her campaign without reporting a single expenditure over $100.
How does one do that? Why does one do that? And who are the people that loaned her money and why hasn’t she paid them back?
Anybody who wants to sink this lady’s boat just needs to follow the money.
Thats not legal, but then whose asking?
Why are you picking on KWS? Is it because she wasn’t your pick? She hasn’t had a chance to do anything wrong. You have a problem with the web site having a relevant post about the new commissioner. That seems like information which is useful to the public.
One thing for sure, she will screw up less than Denn. It is nice to have a real professional in the office who understands underwriting more than politics and pr.
Let’s see, she had yard signs and bus signs and literature. Any one of those costs more than $100. Someone needs to investigate this woman.
David,
FYI. This sentence identifies you as a nit wit.
One thing for sure, she will screw up less than Denn.
Hello David…uh…I mean Elliott. Still up and at the lies, I see.
The following list is copied from one of her campaign finance reports. Scroll through it and see the expenditure for EZ Pass…….SHE DOESN’T EVEN OWN A CAR!
Account Number: ****** Reporting Period: 08/11/2008 09/01/2008
FROM TO
Itemize all expenditures over $100 for the reporting period. All expenditures to Political Committees must be itemized, regardless of the amount. NOTE: IF you expend funds to the same person or organization several times
during the reporting period, each item must be listed if the aggregate amount is over $100, even if the individual amounts are not.
EXPENDITURES IN EXCESS OF $100:
Date Expended Payee Name Payee Mailing Address Aggregate Amount Amount Expended
08/11/2008 Direct Media 240 N. James St., Newport, DE 19804 $8,295.00 $3,295.00
08/11/2008 Direct Media 240 N. James St., Newport DE 19804 $10,272.00 $1,975.00
08/11/2008 Don Faucher Wilmington, Delaware $350.00 $350.00
08/11/2008 Elliott Jacobson Washington, D.C. $4,001.26 $423.19
08/11/2008 EZPASS Delaware Dover, Delaware $125.00 $50.00
08/11/2008 US Postal Service New Castle, Delaware $961.96 $16.91
08/30/2008 US Postal Service New Castle, Delaware $1,062.87 $100.91
TOTAL EXPENDITURES IN EXCESS OF $100 $6,211.01
TOTAL EXPENDITURES NOT IN EXCESS OF $100 $217.25
GRAND TOTAL EXPENDITURES
(TOTAL SHOULD ALSO APPEAR ON PAGE 2, STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT BALANCE, ITEM 3F)
$6,428.26
Hm….guess I was wrong about your identity. What do you have against Matt Denn? He set a “higher standard” of the kind this self-aggrandizing uneducated b…ch couldn’t even spell, let alone implement. Are you on her payroll, too?
PI…she doesn’t own a car because she’s been unemployed for the last 8-10 years. The few retail sales jobs she had pay minimum wage. Elliott’s story about her wrecking it in an accident is bogus.
Gabriel,
Do you have any proof of the stuff you claim about KWS? Any documents, sworn statements, anything?
I’m not being facetious, just honestly curious.
It seems that the sheer volume of anti-KWS’ians would have SOMEthing concrete to back up their statements.
Yes I do. I wouldn’t just make idle allegations. Now think about what you said…”the sheer volume of anti-KWS’ians”. That alone should prove to you that what I’ve been saying is valid, otherwise I’d be a lone voice out here.
You can also have her produce proof of what she claimed and still claims about herself. No one bothered with that during the campaign even though there was plenty of evidence to the contrary.
Hey, I voted for John Brady, but I am willing to give her and Jack Markell a chance. I am still willing to give Matt Denn one too, but he is concerning me.
Forgive me when I laugh at the people who torpedoed Gene Reed complain about someone else. KWS knows the business. If she succeeds, I will be happy. If she doesn’t, I will be happy to have Donna Stone take her place in 4 years.
I heard a lot during the campaign about this type of stuff, but not a single solitary person came forward with any sort of evidence. Instead, we got stupid made-up junk from the Log Cabin Republicans.
If anyone has evidence, fax it to TNJ or WDEL, scan and e-mail it to DL, DWA, DP… I’m sure they’d be more than happy to write about it.
I’m just skeptical of people who claim things and can’t back it up. It’s kind of hard to prove a negative. (e.g., “I don’t work for Lowe’s.”)
Gabriel wrote: “Now think about what you said…”the sheer volume of anti-KWS’ians”. That alone should prove to you that what I’ve been saying is valid, otherwise I’d be a lone voice out here.”
Actually, it proves nothing. It could prove sockpuppetry. It could prove that a lot of people hate her guts and are willing to make shit up. I’m not saying either of those are the case, but noise and numbers do not equal truth!
“…It is nice to have a real professional in the office …”
This must be the joke of the day
Here is the link to her last campaign finance report (hat tip to Mike Matthews):
http://denver.state.de.us/COE/cfishome.nsf/vwElectionData/STEWARTK!-08-CAN-YRE-YREND.pdf/$File/STEWARTK!-08-CAN-YRE-YREND.pdf?openelement
It also shows that:
Daniel Harkins 7 Rolling Road,
Claymont, DE
Loaned her $10,000.00 unsecured at 0% interest on 12/18/08 (after the election).
Who dat?
hmmmm, why do I get the feeling that Jason posted this non-post because he missed Gabby and PI. Is this nonsense the only way to get them to come around?
KWS.Haters.Hits.Desparate.Much?
I see Nancy Willing is back. The eternal KWS supporter despite all the evidence.
oh my, I thought the new rules prevented such ‘outings’ gabby. tsk tsk.
You’re wrong, Gabriel, that’s not Nancy (just like David wasn’t Elliot). Anon2700 has a point.
“Gabby” was originally Nancy’s name for me.
It’s strange that now when you can all see that what I’ve said all along is true because of the way KWS conducts herself, you’re suddenly doubting it? I have first-hand information because I’ve known her a long time and she knows me and knows that what I say is true. She just won’t admit it because that would fly in the face of all her outrageous claims about herself. I can’t get her employment or school records or her income tax returns for her non-business “The Weldin Group,” if she even filed any, nor can I sit her down with a pencil in hand and ask her to write a paragraph on any topic or speak without someone having written the text for her. There are people who can, however. And they will soon enough, when KWS provides them with a reason.