Comment rescue #20502.b2 of idiot commenter #12-2.b1

Wow is all I can say.

what business is it of government’s to regulate the non-harmful removal of excess epidermis when eight day’s previous it would have been perfectly legal to kill the kid?

Where to begin with that statement. But that’s ok, because ear piercing and circumcision are on par with one another.

And don — what is your position on piercing the ears of infants, if you want to start getting into the question of mutilating children for no medically necessary reason?

Anddddddd here is where we learn one big hunk of information that really sums up all you need to know about RwR:

I don’t think it is government’s business to regulate the essentially harmless practice. At the same time, my wife and I did discuss this issue the first time she was pregnant (sadly, the first of multiple miscarriages that left us childless) and decided that we would not circumcise a son because it was neither medically nor religiously necessary.

I think I’m starting to learn why this joke is the joke that he is. Yet another blogger I’m cooler than.