Common Ground, Not So Much

Filed in National by on July 23, 2009

One thing I really like about President Obama is that he recognizes the long view and knows you have to lay groundwork to get things done. I’ve been amazed that time and time again his foes will take the bait in his carefully laid traps. One of the traps that he set was his talk about finding “common ground” on abortion and defining that common ground as preventing abortion and helping women who are pregnant. The best way to reduce abortion is to reduce unintended pregnancy. So, you would think increased access to contraception is a good thing, right?

Who could have guessed that the first group to set off the trap is a group called “Democrats for Life of America.” Democrats for Life removed pro-life rising star Congressman Tim Ryan (D-OH) from its advisory board because of his sponsorship of a bill called the Preventing Unintended Pregnancies, Reducing the Need for Abortion and Supporting Parents Act. The bill increases funding for contraception, improves access to health care for pregnant women and increases funding for adoption services. The cause of the rift was Ryan’s support of increased access to contraception.

“We’re working in Congress with groups that agree with preventative options while [the DFLA] is getting left behind,” Ryan said. “I can’t figure out for the life of me how to stop pregnancies without contraception. Don’t be mad at me for wanting to solve the problem.”

–snip–

Ryan said he tried to convince officials with Democrats For Life of America, which he referred to Monday as a “fringe group,” that the use of contraception is needed as part of any plan to reduce unintended pregnancies but that failed.

So Democrats for Life are not interested in any kind of compromise, along as it allows women to use contraception. I’m not sure what their idea of reducing abortion is besides forced childbirth and the DFLA was not interested in any kind of compromise.

Here is a summary of the bill:

Reducing the Need for Abortion and Supporting Parents Act – Requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to make grants to provide education on preventing teen pregnancies.

  • Provides for: (1) grants to prevent teen pregnancy; and (2) a national center for parents of adolescents to support parents in preventing teen pregnancy.
  • Amends title XIX (Medicaid) of Social Security Act to expand coverage of family planning services.
  • Sets forth requirements for primary care clinics that receive federal financial assistance and provide abortion services.
  • Expands state options to provide health care coverage to low-income pregnant women.
  • Title X Family Planning Services Act of 2007 – Authorizes appropriations for voluntary family planning projects.
  • Amends the Public Health Service Act to prohibit individual health insurance coverage from excluding pregnancy as a preexisting condition.
  • Provides for: (1) grants for ultrasound equipment and prenatal testing for pregnant women; and (2) programs to better identify and treat pregnant women and mothers who are victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking.
  • Allows the Secretary to make grants to public institutions of higher education to assist students who have decided to carry their pregnancies to term and parenting students in continuing their studies and graduating.
  • Requires the Secretary to require that federally funded group homes for pregnant and parenting women provide, upon request, adoption counseling and counseling on parenting skills.
  • Amends the Internal Revenue Code to: (1) increase the tax credit for adoption expenses; (2) make such tax credit refundable; and (3) increase the exclusion from gross income for employer-paid adoption expenses.
  • Provides for: (1) education of teen and first-time mothers through home visits by registered nurses; and (2) the collection and reporting of abortion surveillance data.
  • Tags: , ,

    About the Author ()

    Opinionated chemist, troublemaker, blogger on national and Delaware politics.

    Comments (10)

    Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

    1. Von Cracker says:

      Sounds like DFLA will be happy with fringe-group status for a while.

      What I can’t get through my head is how people refuse to see the oppressive Taliban-stupid-like culture the anti-choice crowd really is. And it’s just not the fetus fetish, but all icky sex acts too!

    2. Exactly, VC. It’s all about Teh Sex. At least they are revealing their true motivations and not couching in terms of cuddly fetuses.

    3. Susan Regis Collins says:

      Excuse me, but where the eff is the NDC/DLC when it is needed?????

      R.I.P. Mr. Ryan….you know that if you lie down with dogs (especially Blue Dogs) you get up with fleas.

    4. anoni says:

      if it is a “fringe group” as Ryan says, why was he on their advisory board?

    5. anoni says:

      DFLA does not take a position on contraception. Despite rumors to the contrary, we do not oppose contraception. We believe that preventing pregnancy is an important part of reducing the abortion rate in America. There are several ways to address prevention, but there is no clear consensus because of ethical, religious or personal reasons.

      We are focused on helping pregnant women carry their pregnancies to term and making sure that families have affordable health care, a living wage and the means to support their children during the pregnancy and beyond. The Pregnant Women Support Act, introduced by Congressman Lincoln Davis (D-TN) and Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) will support these goals.
      Last Updated ( Jul 22, 2009 at 01:16 PM )
      http://www.democratsforlife.org/

    6. Von Cracker says:

      huh?

      you assume the two are exclusive, anoni.

    7. anoni says:

      no assuming going on, just posting information from the group being discussed.

      actually, I do assume that the Ryan bill includes funding for “Plan B” and RU-486, which would lead a pro life group to oppose it.

    8. Democrats for Life is not a fringe group. They are a growing group who are an important voice in this nation. The Congressman is trying to do good work in stopping abortion coverage in Health Reform. What he may be doing is attempting to forge a consensus which will bury tax funding of abortion and FOCA. He is not entitled to be on the letter head of an organization if he takes a leading role in a position that conflicts with its vision. He made a decision and they made theirs. How is that some horrible exclusion? Should we expect NARRAL to put him on their board?

      Abortion by chemicals is abortion. All contraception is not contraception, but some are chemical abortions. I agree with annoni, it depends what is covered.

    9. Xusumo says:

      What is a chemical abortion? Spermicide? Is this what Republican David means?

    10. LOL Xusumo, I wouldn’t doubt some Republicans would count that as abortion since they don’t like condoms either.

      I assume he’s talking about RU486. Someone also mentioned Plan B, but that is contraception not an abortificant.