President Obama, Nationalize the NFL

Filed in National by on March 12, 2011

Take the NFL away from the owners who are violating the public trust by abusing their monopoly position. Problem solved.

If you want to know all about the owners position read this column by ESPN’s Bill Simons.

About the Author ()

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

Comments (13)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. phil says:

    Terrible idea. Let the NFL fail. There is a massive amount of money just sitting there. Something will take its place.

  2. jason330 says:

    Break the monopoly. I don’t think we have the requisite intestinal fortitude to nationalize or let the NFL fail, but one can dream.

  3. Liberal Elite says:

    I switched to watching real football (aka soccer). American football just isn’t all that great.

  4. jason330 says:

    Change your name to “Liberal Effete” you latte drinking limey.

  5. Liberal Elite says:

    Nope. No limey here. 100% American with eyes open.

    You like what you want, and I’ll like what I want. Frankly, it wouldn’t bother me to see the entire NFL implode.

  6. Publius says:

    What monopoly position????? Anyone is free to form a league to rival the NFL. Think USFL or that other disaster, the XFL, or whatever it was. Moreover, the NFL competes with any other number of entertainment companies/regimes. The whole notion that the NFL is a monopoly really just demonstrates a poor level of understanding economic theory.

  7. Liberal Elite says:

    @Pubilius “Anyone is free to form a league to rival the NFL.”

    Good point, but only partly true. The NFL is engaged politically, and has arranged a number of “special perks” (at taxpayer expense). Unless the competition has access to those same perks, then it IS a monopoly of sorts. Don’t blame the NFL for being greedy. Blame the politicians who play into this nonsense with our money and thus benefact special status on the NFL.

  8. Geezer says:

    The antitrust problem relates to owners imposing a salary cap without an agreement from the players, not to a monopoly on football.

    Publius, to say that football competes with other forms of entertainment shows you don’t know all that much about economic theory as it relates to labor. Football players have specialized skills, just like workers in many other fields. I realize your sort would throw all workers to the tender mercies of capitalists; fortunately for society, the rest of us outnumber your sort.

  9. Liberal Elite says:

    @Geezer “Football players have specialized skills”

    So what? Are those skills essential skills? Entertainment dollars go to people with all sorts of skills.

    If the players want to play hardball, they should just form the PFL (Players Football League). Do they really need the owners?

  10. MJ says:

    Australian Rules Football for me. And the Irish sport of Hurling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurling).

  11. skippertee says:

    We Irish are spectacular Hurlers!
    Why, even at my advanced age [for the sport], I still put up stunning numbers in the projectile vomiting category.

  12. Avagadro says:

    The NFL is simply the highest bidder for those “specialized skills” other competing bidders are the WWF, Cage Fighting, and furniture moving companies.

  13. Geezer says:

    LE: Goodness no. My point was that if owners collude to limit salaries (aka a “salary cap”) it could be ruled a violation of antitrust law.

    I’m against the entire concept of a salary cap. IMO the owners will be entitled to dictate their cut of the profits on the day that ticket purchasers show up to watch owners, rather than players, do their jobs.