General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Weds., May 4, 2011

Filed in National by on May 4, 2011

Remember the nice things I wrote about the opening up of Senate procedures? Seems like it was just yesterday…because it was yesterday. The Senate has already returned to the bad old days of putting roll calls online. Four non-controversial bills, one on nutrients management, one on manufactured housing, one on abandoned property, and one on cycling safety, passed the Senate, but the roll calls were not online. Granted, other than an absence, the votes were unanimous, but this does not bode well going forward. One can only draw the conclusion that the senators get a kick out of thumbing their collective noses at the public’s right-to-know. You can hold them accountable next November. Maybe even get a kick out of it by kicking them out.

Perhaps Tony DeLuca has only temporarily reintroduced this policy to ensure that Senators aren’t left embarrassed, aka ‘pizza-faced’, about publicly casting a vote for SB 49, which deals with the membership of the Delaware Commission on Italian Heritage and Culture. In case you’re wondering, here is the current membership:

Richard A. DiLiberto, Jr.,Chairman

Louis A. Arena

Nicholas S. Caggiano, Sr.

Hon. Joseph T. Conaway

Joseph G. DiPinto

Vincent “Jimmy” Gambacorta

Justine M. Mataleno

Mary Theresa Morrison

Michael A. Terranova

I’m surprised. Who ever would have thought that two ex-legislators would be serving on this august body? Oh, and here’s their website. Explain to me again why state dollars should be spent on this?

Here’s the Senate’s truncated agenda for Wednesday.

The House didn’t do much Tuesday, which was surprising considering the bills that were on the agenda. Two of the mortgage foreclosure bills discussed here yesterday have had House Substitutes introduced in their place, meaning that the bills apparently had technical difficulties that could not readily be resolved by amendment. Either that, or there were so many changes required that it simply made sense to introduce a clean substitute rather than bogging down debate on multiple amendments.

Here is the entire session report for Tuesday.

Per usual, Wednesday is largely given over to committee meetings.

Highlights from the Senate meeting schedule:

*In a rare evening meeting, the Senate Adult & Juvenile Corrections Committee will hold a public hearing on legislation eliminating the Board of Parole. HB 35 passed the House with 28 yes and 13 no.  This could be a last hurrah of sorts for the good ol’ boys who were pals with Uncle Thurm, Warden Jim Vaughn, and the Queen Bee, Nancy Cook. When you look at the committee membership, however, it is not a slam dunk that the bill gets out of committee. Senators Bushweller and McBride are the only committee members who are listed as sponsors, and the committee skews south, as Karen Peterson is the only senator from north of the Canal (unless you count Dave McBride, who lives in Lewes, but has a ‘residence’ in the 13th SD).

*The Senate Health & Social Services Committee considers SB 51 (Katz), which “provides the Department of Health and Social Services with the explicit authority to investigate and inspect unsanitary or unsafe conditions in certain locations where medical or health-related treatment is provided. In addition, it provides that the Department of State, Division of Professional Regulation may investigate and inspect unsanitary and unsafe conditions maintained by individuals licensed by the Board of Medical Licensure and Discipline.” The bill appears a bit broader than, but similar to, HB 47 (B. Short), which is on the way to the Governor for his signature. While HB 47 dealt with facilities where ‘invasive medical procedures’ are conducted, SB 51 appears to apply to a much broader array of facilities.

*The Senate Insurance Committee considers SB 56 (Bushweller), which would “require insurers administering CHIP buy-in programs in other states to cause similar buy-in programs to be offered in Delaware if they should engage in specified transactions or affiliations with Delaware health service corporations.”

*Synthetic cannabinoids surface in today’s Senate Judiciary Committee. ‘Cooler heads’ will not prevail.   The bill that the NRA allegedly ‘allowed’ to pass the House will also be considered.  Will the new head of the Delaware Republican Party flex his muscle? Will timid D’s cower? We’ll know soon enough.

Highlights in the House:

*The House Education Committee will consider HB 90(Schooley), which establishes deadlines and procedures for those Delaware Department of Education employees whose contracts have been terminated.

*The House Energy Committee considers HB 27(Scott), which addresses renewable energy portfolio standards. I know Tommywonk has some concerns about this, and likely will be in Dover to address them today. Tom, the floor is yours.

*Senator Henry’s sterile needle exchange bill will be considered in the House Health & Human Development Committee today. Look for SB 13 to be sent to the Governor before the General Assembly recesses next week.

*I hope that the House gives more needed  serious deliberation to SB 41(Sen. Hall-Long) than the Senate did. This bill would expand the NCC Board of Adjustment from 7 to 13, and would mandate that each councilmanic district have a member. Just what we need. 13 stooges answering to the elected stooges. Speaking of stooges, Gerald Brady chairs the House Housing/Community Affairs Committee where the bill will be considered today, and he’s the co-sponsor. Meaning any serious consideration will have to come from the floor during debate.

Sorry for the relatively short  ‘just the facts, ma’am’ version today. Have to complete my prep for Al’s show today at 10, WDEL-1150 AM. Hear all about ‘Bulo’s righteous weekend with the “Old Rugged Cross Wrestling Federation and Ministry’. Ya think that the Masked Infidels just might have gone down to defeat at the hands of The Apostles? You’ll have to tune in to find out!



Tags:

About the Author ()

Comments (4)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. TommyWonk says:

    Here is my letter on HB 27 on behalf of the Sierra Club:

    The Delaware Chapter of the Sierra Club opposes House Bill 27, which would weaken renewable energy standards for the Delaware Electrical Coop and the municipal energy companies. More precisely, the bill would allow the Coop and the municipal energy companies to count progress on the energy efficiency resource standard (EERS) towards compliance with the renewable portfolio standard (RPS).

    We do not wish to downplay the technical and economic challenges involved in shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy in Delaware. But before weakening standards adopted just last year, we believe the Coop and the municipal energy companies should work with all of the parties engaged in this effort to finds ways to meet these challenges as efficiently and effectively as possible.

    Senate Substitute 1 to Senate Bill 119, which set the current standards, also established a Renewable Energy Task Force, which is in the process of developing mechanisms for creating an efficient and cost effective market for renewable energy credits (RECs). The implementation of Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERS) is entrusted to the EERS Workgroup, which is currently editing its report. As a member of these bodies, alongside the Coop, the municipal energy companies and other stakeholders, I can bear witness to the hard work and collaboration being shared by all of the parties.

    Senate Substitute 1 to Senate Bill 119 created a unique and flexible process for developing renewable energy standards for the Coop and the municipal energy companies:

    §363.(a) Any municipal electric company and any rural electric cooperative may elect to exempt itself from the requirements of this subchapter, if it develops and implements a comparable program to the renewable energy portfolio standards for its ratepayers beginning in 2013.

    The law also allows for mechanisms to ameliorate unfair or abrupt cost hikes for customers—mechanisms that remain unexplored to date. With all the stakeholders at the table, we should be able to work with the Coop and the municipal energy companies to meet the requirements of the law in a way that is fair to their customers and all stakeholders. This would be far preferable to turning back on clean energy standards before we have even implemented them.

    Before reversing course, the General Assembly should be mindful of the benefits of promoting renewable energy. The manufacture and installation of renewable energy systems is a growing industry in Delaware. As the industry matures, we are seeing the cost curve bend to the benefit of system owners and energy customers in general. The Renewable Energy Taskforce is working hard to create a productive and cost effective system for awarding and trading renewable energy credits in a way that minimizes costs and maximizes benefits to this growing industry and to ratepayers.

    There is growing evidence that the implementation of renewable energy and energy efficiency measures will create large benefits to the citizens of Delaware in terms of reduced health and mortality costs. The draft Integrated Resource Plan recently filed by Delmarva Power estimates the health benefits of Delaware’s current renewable energy policies to be $1.8 billion to $4.3 billion in avoided health and mortality costs over the next ten years—$2,000 to $4,750 for every resident of the state of Delaware. The General Assembly should take note of these benefits before rolling back recently enacted measures to reduce air pollution by shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

    We stand ready to work with all parties to make renewable energy a cost effective reality for Delaware within the framework created by the current law. In particular, we would be happy to discuss the bill with you and any of your colleagues. But we oppose any attempt to back out of the current framework without fully exploring the options with all of the parties at the table.

  2. Jason330 says:

    What’s a matter fo’ you? Petey, Little Petey, Medium Petey, Joe Bag-a-donuts, Ant-knee, and Little Ant-knee all want you to …Fah’get about it!

  3. I think the entire RPS needs repeal. We don’t need energy rationing.

  4. cassandra_m says:

    No one here has energy rationing. You can get all of the energy you want if you can pay for it.

    And if there is energy rationing in your part of Delaware, well, I’d pay attention to where you are sending the check for your gas and electric bills.