Weekend Open Thread

Filed in National by on July 9, 2011

Welcome to your weekend open thread. I hope you’re keeping cool and having fun this weekend. I plan on puttering around the house.

An activist with Truth Wins Out went undercover to Marcus Bachmann’s clinic to prove they do “ex-gay” therapy. Bachmann’s clinic has received Medicare money and Bachmann has denied doing the therapy (although he’s been quoted saying gays were “barbarians”).

In the second session, Wiertzema also began what amounted to an extended fishing expedition to find a “cause” for my homosexuality, asking me if I had experienced any physical, emotional, or sexual abuse. In later sessions we would turn again and again to my first sexual experience at age 14. He also insinuated that “there’s maybe a feminine sort of tie” between my self-consciousness about my high speaking voice and my sexuality concerns and that I had somehow conditioned myself to respond sexually to male stimuli by masturbating to gay pornography. After I mentioned a (fictitious) memory of discovering a hidden stash of male pornographic images in the bedroom of a friend’s older sibling, he said that this experience “obviously… had at least a little bit of a part” in the development of my homosexuality and asked, “What if you would have saw [sic] female pornography [instead]? Maybe you would be talking to me right now about your addiction to lust.”

Despite the fact that I never once mentioned having insecurities surrounding my own masculinity, Wiertzema took it upon himself to reassure me in our fifth session that “…because you have feelings of homosexuality, [it] doesn’t mean you don’t have masculinity. I’m just gonna go ahead and say that.” I was encouraged to further develop my own sense of masculinity and my personal definition of what it meant to be a man. When I mentioned that I can objectively acknowledge a woman’s beauty without having any sexual feelings toward her whatsoever, I was told that whenever I saw an attractive woman I just needed to reinforce in my mind that she was, indeed, attractive, and that God made her this way and made me to notice her. After all, “God designed our eyes to be attracted to the woman’s body, to be attracted to everything, to be attracted to her breasts.” Further, according to Wiertzema, “We’re all heterosexuals, but we have different challenges.” Attraction to the same sex “is there, and it’s real, but at the core value, in terms of how God created us, we’re all heterosexual.”

I am fairly skeptical about Bachmentum. There is still a LNG time to go before the first votes are cast and Bachmann will have a lot of gaffes until then (like signing a pledge promising to outlaw all pornography and saying blacks were better off during slavery).

There was a very interesting piece in the Washington Monthly called “Playing Chicken With History.” It discusses how many civilizations have fallen because the wealthy were increasingly separate from the rest of society and used their power to avoid taxation. Sound familiar?

As it happens, the willingness of the rich to defend their wealth from taxation to the point of national ruin is nothing new in world history, as Francis Fukuyama recounts in his magisterial new book The Origins of Political Order. The Han dynasty in China fell in the third century AD after aristocratic families with government connections became increasingly able to shield their ever-larger land holdings from taxation, which helped precipitate the bloody Yellow Turban peasant revolt. Nearly a millennium and a half later, the great Ming dynasty went into protracted decline in part for similar reasons: unable or unwilling to raise taxes on the landed gentry, the government couldn’t pay its soldiers and was overrun by Manchu invaders.

In the fifteenth century, the Hungarian King Matthias Corvinus persuaded his reluctant nobles to accept higher taxes, with which he built a professional military that beat back the invading Ottomans. But after his death the resentful barons placed a weak foreign prince on the throne and got their taxes cut 70 to 80 percent. When their undisciplined army lost to Suleiman the Magnificent, Hungary lost its independence.

Similarly, the cash-strapped sixteenth-century Spanish monarchy sold municipal and state offices off to wealthy elites rather than raise their taxes—giving them the right to collect public revenues. The elites, in turn, raised taxes on commerce, immiserating peasants and artisans and putting Spain on a path of long-term economic decline. This same practice of exempting the wealthy from taxation and selling them government offices while transferring the tax burden onto the poor reached its apogee in ancien regime France and ended with the guillotine.

On my way home from work yesterday, John Boehner was on the radio blaming Obama for the poor job creation numbers and I was struck anew at how odd the Republican rhetoric on jobs really is. Boehner talked about failed stimulus, burdensome regulation, government spending and uncertainty holding back “job creators.” Almost like jobs happen like magic when some regulation is lifted. No talk at all about customers or demand. It was really odd.

Tags:

About the Author ()

Opinionated chemist, troublemaker, blogger on national and Delaware politics.

Comments (14)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. jason330 says:

    Taxes have been cut so low that a new evil needed to be unearthed. That new evil, which is on the lips of every wingnut is…burdensome regulation. To listen to Republicans, you’d think that American business is suffering under the iron glove state control similar to the old soviet empire.

    I don’t know what is more amazing. The Republicans ability to make shit up, or the Democrats inability to call them on it.

  2. Dana Garrett says:

    Soon after the Repubs captured the House in 11/10, there were some good job employment numbers and the Repubs took credit for it, claiming that the “job creators” were encouraged w/ the GOP victory. But now that the GOP have controlled the House for several months and the emplyment numbers are low, the unemployment rate is Obama’s fault and not the GOPS’s. Interesting how that works.

  3. cassandra_m says:

    Dana makes a really good point — and I’m going to tie this to Romney’s problem with sticking to a story. This business of taking credit for whatever is available to take credit for no matter how contradictory it all is is apparently GOP DNA.

  4. I’m wondering when the bad economy is going to bite Republicans. They can no longer blame Obama and the Democrats for everything, not that it won’t stop them from trying. Also I get a bit of a giggle when Obama turned the uncertainty rhetoric right around on them regarding the debt ceiling.

    Yes it really is frustrating that the Democratic narrative can’t break through in the media. I’m sure the fact that Sunday shows are completely dominated by Republicans has nothing to do with it. Plus Republicans have their own network.

  5. I also find it odd to call people who aren’t creating jobs “job creators.”

  6. cassandra_m says:

    Almost like jobs happen like magic when some regulation is lifted. No talk at all about customers or demand. It was really odd.

    Really. And the weird thing about this is that a press that is really fond of its narratives conveniently works at atomizing those narratives. So that the business page reasons why jobs are not being created are always completely separate from the political reasons. Sometimes I wish they’d just stop even working at “news”, because they certainly aren’t working at this to hold anyone accountable or even to actually inform anyone.

  7. jason330 says:

    Thinking more about this, I wonder if the Hungarians, Hans and Mings tricked the peasants into fighting for their aristocratic privilege?

    American aristocrats might be breaking new ground here.

  8. cassandra_m says:

    Usually aristocrats have the privilege of compelling the peasants into fighting to preserve aristocratic privilege.

  9. cassandra_m says:

    The Theodore White Making of the President DVDs are being released!

  10. Dana Garrett says:

    I believe that the real culprit for the tepid recovery is the use unprecedented use of the filibuster by the Repubs in the Senate…killing much job creating legislation. Of course, the Senate Dems are culpable too since they did little to change the filibuster rules by making it costly for the Repubs to use it.

  11. cassandra_m says:

    And there were Dems who joined in the filibuster for some key legislation (Ben Nelson).

  12. NYT is reporting that Boehner has pulled out of talks for a larger deficit reduction, now wants talks on a smaller deficit reduction package. Obama has totally won this round on optics and politics. GOP looks like anti-tax zealots who value tax cuts over deficit reduction.

  13. cassandra m says:

    That’s interesting, UI — because I’ve been reading all weekend about how repubs are backing away from the larger deficit reduction package. So it looks like the GOP will back away from their bullshit spending cuts to try to get a smaller set of cuts with no reform to taxes.

    If this is true, Obama really needs to not blink now. Because the GOP genuinely has nowhere to go now.

  14. cassandra m says:

    One more thing — the tax code reform that Obama called for in the SOTU looks like it is about ready to take center stage. A grand deficit deal that includes some rollbacks of tax giveaways would take away some of this group’s thunder and force the GOP to commit to more than the low-hanging fruit here.