I don’t think you’ll have much of a case against them, but perhaps one of your photoshop guys can turn the “do” emblem into “doodoo.” 🙂 You could at least have some fun with that.
I have wondered if the DL logo was meant intentionally to create the optical illusion that the L is taller than the D, even thought they are actually the same size.
Those are strong words. I assume a lawsuit will be forthcoming?
natch.
what am I missing? no links?
Also, don’t flatter them with “huge”…also, DL not “tiny” either.
Rock on DL
but remember that the greatest form of flattery is mimicry….
That delawareonline logo has been around for several years.
Gannett Lackey Anon, If you think that is going to slow down our litigation crazed lawyers, you are crazy.
Jason, what is this post supposed to feature? The pictures aren’t showing up
The DL thumbnail you did for facebook and the DO thumbnail on facebook.
Oh, let me check.
vs.
Nah. They are both different enough, and if anything, the DO logo has been already longer.
I thought the pictures not showing up was just Jason’s post-modern sense of humor.
It’s Charlie Copeland’s fault. He’s responsible.
LOL, we will go with that Puck for now.
I can see them and the DO thumbnail I’m seeing has a blue background and the “d” in white, so it looks like a copy to me.
I don’t think you’ll have much of a case against them, but perhaps one of your photoshop guys can turn the “do” emblem into “doodoo.” 🙂 You could at least have some fun with that.
I have wondered if the DL logo was meant intentionally to create the optical illusion that the L is taller than the D, even thought they are actually the same size.