A Reverse Braveheart
Just how crazy, insane, and irrational does the Republican House have to be to get the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal to write a scathing denunciation of it? Read the editorial, it is devastating:
GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell famously said a year ago that his main task in the 112th Congress was to make sure that President Obama would not be re-elected. Given how he and House Speaker John Boehner have handled the payroll tax debate, we wonder if they might end up re-electing the President before the 2012 campaign even begins in earnest.
The GOP leaders have somehow managed the remarkable feat of being blamed for opposing a one-year extension of a tax holiday that they are surely going to pass. This is no easy double play.
Republicans have also achieved the small miracle of letting Mr. Obama position himself as an election-year tax cutter, although he’s spent most of his Presidency promoting tax increases and he would hit the economy with one of the largest tax increases ever in 2013. This should be impossible. […]
After a year of the tea party House, Mr. Obama and Senate Democrats have had to make no major policy concessions beyond extending the Bush tax rates for two years. Mr. Obama is in a stronger re-election position today than he was a year ago, and the chances of Mr. McConnell becoming Majority Leader in 2013 are declining.
At this stage, Republicans would do best to cut their losses and find a way to extend the payroll holiday quickly. Then go home and return in January with a united House-Senate strategy that forces Democrats to make specific policy choices that highlight the differences between the parties on spending, taxes and regulation. Wisconsin freshman Senator Ron Johnson has been floating a useful agenda for such a strategy. The alternative is more chaotic retreat and the return of all-Democratic rule.
It is amazing that the GOP decided to assist President Obama in his campaign narrative that GOP is only interested in protecting the rich and obstructing the President, all the while the middle class needs help in a sluggish economy. He has been doing good in that regard this fall, as recent polls released yesterday showed. But now he gets an amazing assist in having his opposition actually perform the role he would have them play, and to perfection.
At a Republican House caucus meeting yesterday night, some fool compared Boehner to William Wallace and that this latest obstruction was a “Braveheart moment.” And this fool was not being ironic. Dana Milbank called out the irony:
“Braveheart” is a conspicuously poor choice for the House GOP.
For one thing, the Republicans are, if anything, in a reverse-“Braveheart” position: In this fight, they are the nobles putting down the overtaxed peasants. For another, the Scots they are emulating were defeated and slaughtered, and Wallace was captured (possibly betrayed by his own side), then drawn and quartered.
But Obama still might blink and give all the advantages to the Republicans. FIRST!
Jason, you know what we did to “FIRSTers” back in the early days of Daily Kos?
No. Are you saying that “FIRST” is a tradition I don’t want to tap into? I thought I invented it.
Oh dear, are you saying you invented the annoying practice of “FIRST?” LOL.
We banned them!!! Severely.
Sorry to hijack this thread with my foolishness. My fingers are crossed on the President seeing this out.
LOL, I am just kidding. My fingers are crossed too. He has a royal straight, so he shouldn’t act like all he has is a low pair.
Obama has had Republicans in this kind of box several times before, and has always opened the latch and offered them a hand to get out. He does sound serious this time though; he has never gone this far down the road before. The person to watch is Biden – he is the harbinger of compromise who goes and works out a more Republican-friendly deal with the Senate. Has anybody seen Joe this week?
Dave Weigel is worried too, because he writes that Democrats are not insane and care about governing responsibly. They want to continue the tax cut, and care if taxes are raised on the middle class.
The probable outcome of this is a deal next week where the two month Senate bill is passed in exchange for a conference on a year long extension and vote on that bill.
So tax cuts for the rich are to be gouged from middle class programs while tax cuts for the middle class are to be gouged from the middle class.
Do I have that right?
Pretty much. The job creators are untouchable on account of all the jobs they are creating. I hear Charlie Copeland just hired another scullery maid.
More like indentured servants if this keeps up….
Where are the jobs anyway?
Charlie Copeland is not hiring another scullery maid. He wasn’t able to pay her full salary out of his tax cut. But maybe next year … when we do away with all taxes for the 1 percent.
I think Charlie is mostly focusing on the inheritance tax. For him, the inheritance tax is a kitchen-table issue.