Wednesday Open Thread [8.22.12]

Filed in Open Thread by on August 22, 2012

“I have a job to do as president, and that does not involve convincing folks that my faith in Jesus is legitimate and real. I do my best to live out my faith, and to stay in the Word, and to make my life look more like His. What I can do is just keep on following Him, and serve others—trying to make folks’ lives a little better using this humbling position that I hold,” – Barack Obama.

Damn straight. Those are the words of a true Christian, for you will notice that the President understands the true teachings of Jesus of compassion, good works and humility rather than the perverted Christianist form that Evangelicals adhere to now, where you have to be selfish, greedy, and hateful of your fellow man.

Speaking of false hateful Christianists…

“If the campaign is about issues, we win. If it’s about Mitt Romney’s record as a businessman, then we don’t win. If it’s about Mitt Romney’s tax returns, then we don’t win. If it’s about whether people like Mitt Romney more than Barack Obama, then we don’t win.” — Rick Santorum.

I agree with two thirds of Mr. Santorum’s statement, the latter two thirds. The only way Santorum’s party wins is if this campaign is about lies. How very Christian of him.

About the Author ()

Comments (11)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Mike O. says:

    Local education notes:

    1. Delaware announces launch of the Education Insight data system.

    2. Third and final DOE regulatory review meeting tomorrow evening, this one in NCC. I think this is an opportunity educators should not pass up. I’ll be attending this one, so if you have comments you’d like me to bring please post them here or over on my site. Meeting is tomorrow Thursday Aug. 23, from 6 to 8 p.m. at the New Castle County Government Center, 77 Reads Way, New Castle.

  2. Jason330 says:

    DD, I agree. That’s what a Christian sounds like. It is an indictment of American Christianity that you hear so little of that.

  3. This is probably not for most of the regulars here, but I thought I would post it on the off-chance it catches some relevant eyes: http://www.delawarerighttomarry.com/2012/08/interns-wanted.html

  4. mediawatch says:

    The latest from Mr. Clark:
    “Erasing a budget deficit takes more than just a wave of the hand. But Paul Clark did it three times in 18 months.”
    More to the point: For three consecutive years, Mr. Clark either proposed (as county exec) or voted to approve (as council president) budgets that consistently underestimated county revenues.

  5. Rustydils says:

    Nobody ever said that Barack has any trouble laying it on real thick

  6. puck says:

    Far-right judge – a sitting judge – in Lubbock County TX defends 1.7 cent tax increase:

    Judge Head said he and the county must be prepared for many contingencies, one that he particularly fears, is if President Obama is re-elected.

    “He’s going to try to hand over the sovereignty of the United States to the UN, and what is going to happen when that happens?,” Head asked.

    “I’m thinking the worst. Civil unrest, civil disobedience, civil war maybe. And we’re not just talking a few riots here and demonstrations, we’re talking Lexington, Concord, take up arms and get rid of the guy.

    “Now what’s going to happen if we do that, if the public decides to do that? He’s going to send in U.N. troops. I don’t want ‘em in Lubbock County. OK. So I’m going to stand in front of their armored personnel carrier and say ‘you’re not coming in here’.

    “And the sheriff, I’ve already asked him, I said ‘you gonna back me’ he said, ‘yeah, I’ll back you’. Well, I don’t want a bunch of rookies back there. I want trained, equipped, seasoned veteran officers to back me.”

  7. Andrew Groff says:

    Today, I was invited to the University of Delaware and Delaware First Media debate. I was provided with the usual money-centered qualification reasoning used as a litmus test of a “serious” candidate. As my campaign has de-emphasized the monetary accoutrements of a “classical” run for office, my representation of both the Libertarian Party of Delaware and The Green party of Delaware seem to hold no merit at all, even though the State recognizes our credibility and seriousness by including us on the November ballot. The result of this apparent exclusion is to disenfranchise Green and Libertarian voters to have their selected representatives put forth their subscribed positions on today’s most important issues in the public market of ideas in an arbitrary and irrational manner. All in all, which ever way things turn out debate-wise, I guarantee October 16th will be a very interesting night for those choosing to be in Newark for the “festivities”. Whether it is to be on stage in ideological battle or outside demanding to be heard. Freedom, Liberty and Democracy have not yet been driven from the hearts and minds of the American people. Nor shall it stand that those in power will affect this abomination.

  8. SussexWatcher says:

    Andrew: You said you were invited, which you previously hadn’t been. So what are you complaining about now? I can’t make it through all the 1960s rhetoric and self-righteousness in your post.

  9. Andrew Groff says:

    SW, I apologize for the use of big words too complicated for you to understand. The invitation is “conditional” and there is plenty of room to complain. The News Journal has published at least one article, one blog entry and multiple letters to the editor related to this controversy. 60’s rhetoric? Well, I guess fairness and equality are retro.

  10. SussexWatcher says:

    Groffster,

    ‘Cept you didn’t say anything about it being conditional. You said you were invited. Look, I think everyone on the ballot ought to be in the debate, but you just sound like a pompous whiny punk when you write crap like that.