Question of the Day
We have a hostage situation. Some criminals are threatening to shoot hostages unless the hostages’ loved ones pay the ransom. So the question is, who is to blame for this hostage situation, the hostages and their loved ones who refuse to pay the ransom, or the criminals with the gun?
Take the poll
The hostage takers do not want the situation resolved. That’s where you are getting tripped up. The hostage takers don’t want to collect a ransom they want to burn everything down and cleanse the Earth by fire.
Ah, but you have not heard from the much learned Senator Marco Rubio from Florida:
They are desperate.
Rubio is listening to Romney’s pollsters.
PS – Alan Loudell used to love Rassy. I haven’t tuned in for a while, does he still give those idiots airtime.
The are indeed desperate, when the AFC is implemented the public will indeed see what liars the GOP has been.
I hope the Rethuglicans pay dearly for this mess.
They have to be made to pay by Democrats and Democrats still don’t have the stomach for that.
Right after the second world war England started Universal Health Care the Tories fought it like the Repuks are doing today their reason was once it goes into effect Labor will rule the country for the next 40 years.
True, but their fears were unfounded. The Labour Party was elected in 1945, installed the NHS, and then were promptly turned out by the voters in 1951, who reelected the Tory Winston Churchill. The Tories went on to win the elections of 1955, 1959, 1970, 1979, 1983, 1987, 1992 and 2010. In the 68 years since 1945, the Tories have held 10 Downing Street for 38 years. The Labour Party has held it for 30.
Why?
Because the Tories accepted the NHS, and thus that meant the public could accept the Tories.