Former NM Governor Bill Richardson was in Leg Hall today…

Filed in National by on March 27, 2014

… to speak in support of Senate Bill 19, the bill to repeal the death penalty, which passed the Senate last year 11-10, but which remains in committee in the House. Below are his remarks from a press conference today:

GOV. BILL RICHARDSON PRESS CONFERENCE REMARKS
March 27, 2014

I am honored to be here in Dover today, capital of our country’s “First State”.

It’s my first visit to your beautiful Legislative Hall and while it is physically smaller than our ‘Round House’ in Santa Fe, the issue before you — life or death — is as big and as important as it gets.

I am here to support the effort to repeal Delaware’s death penalty, Senate Bill 19.

I’d like to thank the bill’s sponsors for hosting me today: Sen. Karen Peterson (D) and House prime sponsors, Rep. Darryl Scott (D) and Rep. Joe Miro (R), as well their other 11 House co-sponsors, many of whom are here with us today.

That’s13 House sponsors, Democrats and Republicans, out of 21 votes needed for House passage.

I commend these sponsors for their work.

As many of you know, just over five years ago I signed into law the repeal of the death penalty in New Mexico.

Throughout my adult life, I had been a firm believer in the death penalty as a just punishment – albeit, only in very rare instances and only for the most heinous crimes.

But during my two terms as Governor of New Mexico, I started to challenge my own thinking on the death penalty.

The issue became more real to me because I knew the day would come when one of two things might happen: I would either have to take action on legislation to repeal the death penalty, or more daunting, I might have to sign someone’s death warrant.

The prospect of either decision was extremely troubling. But I was elected by the people of New Mexico to make just that type of decision.

In the past, I had believed that the death penalty served as a deterrent to some who might consider murdering a law enforcement officer, a corrections officer, or a witness to a crime. But people continued to commit such terrible crimes even in the face of the death penalty.

Let’s be candid here — there are decent, responsible people of good conscience on each side of this vitally important public policy issue. And yes, they disagree strongly.

However, what we cannot disagree upon is the finality of this ultimate punishment. Once a human being is executed, that act cannot be reversed.

Regardless of my personal opinion about the death penalty, I did not at that time nor do I at this time have supreme confidence in the infallibility of our criminal justice system as the final arbiter of who lives and who dies.

If the state — in this case, Delaware — is going to take upon itself this awesome responsibility — life or death — then the system to impose the death penalty must be perfect and can never, ever be wrong.

But the reality is that our system is not perfect — far from it. In fact, the system is inherently defective. DNA testing conclusively has proven that. In some cases, new evidence is brought to bear years after a verdict has been rendered. Witnesses recant their testimony.

The fact is that innocent people have been put on death rows and put to death all across the country.

It also bothers me greatly that minorities are overrepresented in the prison population across our country and on death row.

According to the NAACP’s Legal Defense Fund, Delaware has the highest minority population on death row of any state, at 78%.

Furthermore, a study out of Cornell University found that in Delaware, a black defendant who kills a white victim is more than 6 times as likely to receive a death sentence than a black defendant who kills a black victim.

While I was considering whether to sign or veto the death penalty repeal law in New Mexico, I invited people to contact me with their views. I heard compelling arguments from family members who had lost loved ones and from law enforcement officers concerned about their on-the-job safety.

But I also heard equally compelling arguments from members of the clergy as well as from family members who also lost loved ones and from law enforcement officers who urged me to sign the repeal in New Mexico.

I respected everyone’s opinions and took their experiences to heart, as I am certain that all Delaware state legislators are doing right now.

As the Delaware House of Representatives considers Senate Bill 19, I would like to emphasize that repeal of the death penalty would actually keep Delaware families and communities safe.

Senate Bill 19 is a tough bill: it will result in the state’s worst criminals being sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. They will never get out of prison. They will never threaten our communities again. Those convicted of murder will die in prison.

Since we repealed the death penalty in New Mexico, we have seen no big upswing in murder overall nor has there been a huge upswing in the death of law enforcement officers.

In fact, our murder rate is down significantly, and let me add that not a single legislator who voted to repeal the death penalty in New Mexico lost his or her seat in a re-election bid because of that vote.

More than 144 death row inmates have been exonerated across America since 1973 — including four (4) New Mexicans — a fact that none of us can ignore.

I feel deeply about this issue.

Since leaving the governorship of New Mexico, I have become Co-Chairman of the International Commission Against the Death Penalty, traveling the world to make the case against its use.

Many of the countries that continue to support and use the death penalty are also the most repressive nations in the world, including China, North Korea, and Iran. That is not good company for the United States or Delaware.

In a society that values individual life and personal liberty above all else, where justice and not vengeance is the singular guiding principal of our criminal justice system, the potential for wrongful conviction and, God forbid, execution of an innocent person, stands as anathema to our very sensibilities as human beings.

That’s why I am here in Delaware today — to urge members of the State House of Representatives to release Senate Bill 19 from committee and to bring it forward for a full House debate and an up or down vote.

At the very, very least, Delaware deserves a vote on this important piece of legislation. It’s a matter of life or death.

About the Author ()

Comments (9)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. SussexWatcher says:

    Another Hail Mary attempt to get some attention. They’re not changing anyone’s mind. The debate now is like two equally deaf old men yelling at each other over the fence. No one on either side is listening. The bleeding hearts just don’t have the votes, but they’re so dug in they can’t admit the crew-cuts have won.

    If they were smart, which they don’t seem to be, they’d gracefully bow out now and bring it back in January, when everyone’s got at least two years to make people forget how they voted. Bringing this up in an election year is just bad politics.

  2. Perry says:

    I take being labelled a “bleeding heart” to be an unintended compliment.

    So yes, I take to heart every word Governor Richardson uttered in his articulation of the death penalty issue.

    Moreover, abolishing it has bipartisan support in our State, so what are we waiting for?

  3. Tom McKenney says:

    I can think of liberal and conservative arguments against the death penalty, several which are the same.

  4. SussexWatcher says:

    Everything has bipartisan support. Mike Protack had bipartisan support. That doesn’t mean shit. Majority support is what matters.

    Look, I support the death penalty, but here’s some free political advice. Do you want to charge ahead, bust it out of committee and then watch it go down to defeat on the floor? That demolishes any hope of bringing it back in 2015 unless there is a huge groundswell of support among the new freshmen – which there won’t be. Or do you quietly drop it now, organize better and smarter this fall, and bring it back anew in the new session?

    Scott seems to be playing it smart so far. He can count the votes and knows he doesn’t have them. With him gone next session, best for him to make the handoff to a new sponsor now, quietly, and look to 2015.

  5. Ezra Temko says:

    If there is an injustice occurring in our state, regardless of whether legislation can or cannot get passed in the next three months (and while at this point it looks like the chances are not wonderful, I will wait until July to say it is dead for this session), why should organizations and folks be quiet about it? Continuing to educate and advocate, during the legislative session and during the election year, is appropriate, worthwhile, and moral.

  6. Idealist says:

    Well Put Ezra.

    Sussex Watcher, your free political advice is a reminder that we get what we pay for. If opponents to the bill are so sure it will fail, why are they working so hard to make sure it stays bottled up in committee? Why not let the House have a debate and vote on it?

    Support for the death penalty is inversely related to education on the issue of the death penalty. Please, defend this failed, barbaric policy.

  7. rustydils says:

    What I dont understand, is if you are so against killing violent criminals, why are you so for killing innocent un born kids

  8. Dave says:

    It’s pretty simple really. “unborn” means it is not a kid. Also I assume your discriminator is the word “innocent.” So I might ask you a similar question, that if you are against putting innocent people to death, why would you support the death penalty since there are numerous cases of people on death row who were wrongfully convicted? Collateral damage?

  9. Tom McKenney says:

    If you care so much about children, lets hear your antiwar position.