Tuesday Open Thread [5.5.15]
Ed Kilgore on why Hillary is pursuing a progressive campaign: It's because she can't reassemble the Clinton Coalition, so she is going to use the Obama Coalition instead:
So the thinking person’s empirically oriented conservative political analyst, Sean Trende of RealClearPolitics, has an interesting piece suggesting that the apparent decision of Hillary Clinton to run a progressive-leaning campaign is a sign not of any real confidence it’s the winning formula, but of the absence of any alternative. Sean’s playing off a TNR column by Brian Beutler suggesting that HRC has reason to believe she can keep the “Obama coalition” together and that it will continue to be enough for victory in a presidential election. Trende points to some reasons he thinks that calculation may be wrong, but argues HRC’s probably making the best of a bad hand because the “Clinton coalition,” which included many blue-collar white voters, is gone forever. I don’t want to put any words in Brian’s mouth, but I’d say Sean’s missing another possibility. Sure, the days are gone for good where any Democrat, even Bill Clinton’s wife, is going to try to appeal to white-working class voters on cultural grounds, as the 42d president famously did in 1992 and 1996. But appealing to some of them on a “populist” economic message, as HRC is showing every sign of doing, couldn’t do worse and might do better than the conventional Democratic pitch.
![Tuesday Open Thread [5.5.15]](https://delawareliberal.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/DL.Open_.Thread.Black_-1024x768.png)


Spring landscape at Winterthur. Photo by the Flying Inn on Flickr.