Thursday Open Thread [7.2.15]
This chart above reflects how many of the counties in each of the states affected by last week’s Marriage Equality ruling are actually issuing marriage licenses to gay or lesbian couples. Courtesy of Ballotpedia.
“For Democrats, Donald Trump amounts to a kind of divine intervention. With the Republican Party on an urgent mission to woo Latino voters, one of its leading presidential candidates has been enmeshed for two weeks in a nasty feud over his inflammatory comments about Mexican immigrants,” the Washington Post reports.
“The comments — and many more since — have prompted an uproar among Latino groups and acrimonious breakups between Trump and various corporate partners. His outlandish rhetoric and skill at occupying the national spotlight are also proving to be dangerously toxic for the GOP brand, which remains in the rehabilitation stage after losing the 2012 presidential race.”
The New York Times says that the “Democrats relish the situation.” I am always a more “be careful what you wish for person.” I remember when everyone wanted that idiot Bush junior to run because he could be easily beatable. But then again, there is always the Christine O’Donnell Factor: sometimes you are just so fucking crazy that no one will vote for you.
New York Times on whether Scott Walker has run too far to the right.
“To protect his lead in Iowa, a state with a heavily conservative Republican electorate, Mr. Walker has taken a harder line on a number of issues than his allies had anticipated. Now a growing number of party leaders say Mr. Walker is raising questions about his authenticity and may be jeopardizing his prospects in states where voters’ sensibilities are more moderate.”
“His response to the Supreme Court’s decision legalizing same-sex marriage most emphatically demonstrated his sharp shift to the right: Mr. Walker called the court’s ruling ‘a grave mistake’ and reiterated his call for a constitutional amendment that would allow states to ban same-sex marriage. It sent a clear message to social conservatives, and one that was noticeably not echoed by two of his leading rivals, Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush — who warned last year that Republicans would need to campaign as if they were willing to lose the nomination if they hoped to win the general election.
They all have run too far to the right, with the possible exception of Lindsay Graham of all people.
NATIONAL–PRESIDENT–REPUBLICAN PRIMARY–CNN/ORC: Bush 19, Trump 12, Huckabee 8, Carson 7, Paul 7, Rubio 6, Walker 6, Perry 4, Christie 3, Cruz 3, Santorum 3, Jindal 2, Kasich 2, Fiorina 1, Graham 1, Pataki 0
NATIONAL–PRESIDENT–DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY–CNN/ORC: Clinton 57, Biden 16, Sanders 14, Webb 2, O’Malley 1, Chafee 0
NATIONAL–PRESIDENT–CNN/ORC:
Clinton 54, Bush 41
Clinton 56, Rubio 39
Clinton 56, Christie 37
Clinton 59, Trump 34
Clinton 57, Walker 38
IOWA–PRESIDENT–DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY–Quinnipiac: Clinton 52, Sanders 33, Biden 7, O’Malley 3, Webb 1, Chafee 0
IOWA–PRESIDENT–REPUBLICAN PRIMARY–Quinnipiac: Walker 18, Trump 10, Carson 10, Paul 9, Cruz 9, Bush 8, Rubio 7, Huckabee 5, Perry 4, Santorum 4, Fiorina 3, Jindal 3, Kasich 2, Graham 1, Christie 1, Pataki 0
MICHIGAN–PRESIDENT–REPUBLICAN PRIMARY–Public Policy Polling: Walker 15, Trump 14, Bush 14, Carson 14, Rubio 9, Huckabee 8, Christie 5, Cruz 5, Paul 4, Fiorina 3, Kasich 3, Santorum 2, Graham 1, Perry 1, Jindal 0, Pataki 0
MICHIGAN–PRESIDENT–DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY–Public Policy Polling: Clinton 57, Sanders 25, Chafee 5, Webb 2, O’Malley 1
Chafeementum!!!
MICHIGAN–PRESIDENT–Public Policy Polling:
Clinton 47, Bush 38
Clinton 49, Carson 41
Clinton 44, Christie 38
Clinton 49, Cruz 39
Clinton 46, Fiorina 38
Clinton 47, Huckabee 42
Clinton 45, Paul 42
Clinton 46, Rubio 40
Clinton 49, Trump 39
Clinton 46, Walker 42
The U.S. economy grew by 223,000 jobs in June, while the unemployment rate rose to 5.3 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported this morning.
The CNN/ORC poll released earlier this week shows that most Americans support both of the Supreme Court’s major rulings last week upholding the Affordable Care Act and overturning same-sex marriage bans nationwide.
According to a new CNN/ORC poll, 63% support the Court’s ruling upholding government assistance for lower-income Americans buying health insurance through both state-operated and federally-run health insurance exchanges. Slightly fewer, 59%, say they back the ruling which made same-sex marriages legal in all 50 states.
And the run to the right has just begun! As predicted Republican candidates will be forced to take positions that will harm them and the party nationally to placate an ever farther right base. It’s gonna be good. For entertainment value that is.
Here is the problem – we have a media that willfully ignores, and even downplays the Republican candidate’s extremism. In order to not be viewed as “biased” the media will treat the GOP nominee as a legitimate slightly right-of-center alternative to the Democrat.
That’s why I agree with DD. Be careful about what you wish for.
How can the Republicans split the donor pie 16 ways and expect to compete with a fundraising powerhouse like Clinton? Republican voters are not courted to get out and vote with the same vigor that Democrats do so well. The Tea Party splits the Republican party making it even weaker. It will be interesting to see if the Republicans can get their act together enough to make it a competitive race. Not looking good for them right now.
Thank you for including the link to the Bureau of Labor Statistics report. The unemployment rate is often quoted but only tells part of the story. The stats for part-time, marginally attached, and discouraged worked completes the story, as does wages. It is always good to see all of the information instead of only that which the media decides makes for a good headline. The unemployment trend looks good.
The republicans offer absolutely nothing for average people besides pandering to hate fear and religious zealotry
I don’t remember the numbers I heard, but I’m sure I heard Jeb Bush raised significantly more than Hillary.
I continue to find it interesting that while Rand Paul is just out of the first tier of the GOP candidates when you poll them, on a national level he continues to do as well or better than almost anybody else against Clinton. I’m not suggesting that closeness will actually hold up in a one-on-one face-off but it does raise the question of why he polls better nationally. I’m thinking that his rather eclectic mix of positions is drawing the attention of a lot of “mostly but not completely one issue” voters.
Similar, perhaps, to Bernie Sanders. People just want to hear a message that doesn’t sound like doctrinaire tripe.
BTW – Steve I FB messaged you question. Nothing pressing.