Cons Win When Dems Stay Home

Cons Win When Dems Stay Home

In what should come as no surprise (again) to any fence sitting or left leaning person in the US, Conservatives won big (again) in off-year elections because of poor voter turnout (again) especially among Democrat supporters (again). It seems we’re too addicted to the sh!t show produced by the GOP and right wing extremists in this country to actually get up off our sofas and do something (again). This is not unlike our fascination with “Reality” TV. Except unlike “reality” TV, these election results will continue us on the path toward becoming the ultimate laughing stock in the civilized world.
Wednesday Open Thread [11.4.15]

Wednesday Open Thread [11.4.15]

Jonathan Chait asks if Ben Carson is really running for President: “It is hard to tell. Conservative politics are so closely intermingled with a lucrative entertainment complex that it is frequently impossible to distinguish between a political project (that is, something designed to result in policy change) and a money-making venture. Declaring yourself a presidential candidate gives you access to millions of dollars’ worth of free media attention that can build a valuable brand. So the mere fact that Carson calls himself a presidential candidate does not prove he is actually running for president rather than taking advantage of the opportunity to build his brand. Indeed, it is possible to be actually leading the polls without seriously trying to win the presidency.” “And the notion that Carson could be president is preposterous. The problem is not only that he has never run for elected office. He has never managed a large organization; he has not worked in and around public policy, and he lacks a competent grasp of issues. His stance on health care, the closest thing to an issue with which his professional experience has brought him into contact, is gibberish. He mostly thrills audiences by scoffing at evolution and insisting Muslims be barred from the presidency, stances he cannot even defend coherently.”
Tuesday Open Thread [11.3.15]

Tuesday Open Thread [11.3.15]

Jane Sanders told Yahoo News that her husband’s presidential campaign is less about winning than about setting the agenda.
Said Sanders: “He’s doing what he aimed to do… The last election the candidates didn’t talk about inequality, they didn’t talk about fairness, they didn’t talk about climate change. He’s setting the agenda. That’s what it’s about.”
EXACTLY! And should stay in until the end.
Delaware: The Next Colorado?

Delaware: The Next Colorado?

We are at a tipping point in the movement for legalization of marijuana, just as the Hate Amendment in California was the tipping point in the marriage equality movement. The latest Gallup poll shows that 58 percent of American favor pot legalization. Kevin Drum predicts that marijuana will be generally legal by 2019. And 24/Wall Street is now out with an article that predicts the next 11 states that will legalize marijuana. Where does Delaware rank among the most 11 most likely states?
CarperBot Marshall Lauds LGBT Hero McBride: It’s a Trap!

CarperBot Marshall Lauds LGBT Hero McBride: It’s a Trap!

Carperdyne Model T1000, otherwise known to us mere Democrats as Mat "Only One T" Marshall, recently highlighted a New Statesmen article in a Facebook post regarding the future of transgender politics, saying simply (yet deviously) that Sarah McBride "won't share this because she knows it doesn't stack up to my Delaware Liberal coverage, but I'm happy to take the high road."
"Lesbian and gay politics advanced on the shoulders of courageous trailblazers like Harvey Milk, Barney Frank, and Chris Smith. Georgina Beyer allowed trans people to dream big dreams when she was elected the first transgender national parliamentarian in New Zealand in 1999. Who will be the first out transgender person elected to high office in America and Britain? Sarah McBride has all the right credentials in the United States—former student body president at American University, staffer for Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, White House intern, campaign director at the Center for American Progress."
Emphasis mine. Surely this is some sort of evil plot by Emperor Palpatine... er ah, I mean Senator Carper to cloak himself in Sarah's accomplishments and glory. Nevermind that Sarah and Mat[t] have been friends since high school.
LIVE from the Red Clay Consolidated School District Special Board Meeting on WEIC

LIVE from the Red Clay Consolidated School District Special Board Meeting on WEIC

Red Clay's Board of Education has called a special session public meeting this evening.  The lone topic on the agenda is WEIC. This will be my attempt at live blogging the meeting, start to finish. You can check out the agenda and related documents from Red Clay's BoardDocs site: http://www.boarddocs.com/de/rccsd/Board.nsf/Public Meeting is scheduled to begin at 5:30pm.
John Kowalko Gets it Right

John Kowalko Gets it Right

There are some common sense things we should be doing. Markell's Secretary of Finance can't be bothered with them unless they shift more of the tax burden onto the middle class.
Does Anyone Really Believe Reince Priebus Is In Control Of The Clown Car

Does Anyone Really Believe Reince Priebus Is In Control Of The Clown Car

No way. No how. Via TPM:
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus on Monday morning said that the committee still has control over the Republican presidential debate process despite reports that the Republican campaigns want to reduce the RNC's role.[...] Stephanopoulos asked if the RNC expects candidates to propose changes other than demands for opening and closing statements, equal number of questions for candidates, and approval of graphics. In response, Priebus said that the RNC won't make changes to the debate contracts or schedules going forward. "The ability to sanction or de-sanction a debate is with the RNC. And the candidates want that to be with the RNC because we’ve got the leverage to make that happen," he said. He said that he will communicate with the campaigns and "fight for what the candidates want" when they reach a consensus. "When we started this process, we only wanted to do a few things: One, we wanted to set a reasonable calendar. We didn’t want 23 debates," Priebus added. "We wanted some say over who the moderators were. And we did all that."
Which is it? The RNC won't make changes to the debate contracts or schedules, or the RNC will "fight for what the candidates want" for the debates? Or is he saying that the RNC won't make any more changes once these yet unknown candidate conditions are implemented? Good luck with that. This appears to be the shiny new thing in GOPland. Contest everything and whine about how everything is a plot to make you look bad. Remember the skewed polls. This is the skewed debates.
Monday Open Thread [11.2.15]

Monday Open Thread [11.2.15]

E.J. Dionne Jr:
Maybe our definition of the Republican presidential contest is a little off. It’s often cast, accurately enough, as a choice between “outsiders” and “insiders.” But another party division may be more profound — between Republicans who still view the country’s future hopefully and those deeply gloomy about its prospects. The pessimism within significant sectors of the GOP is more than the unhappiness partisans typically feel when the other side is in power. It’s rooted in a belief that things have fundamentally changed in America, and there is an ominous possibility they just can’t be put right again. This is one of the big contrasts between the two parties: Democrats are more bullish on the future.
The things that cannot be put right are not our economy or standing in the world, etc. Rather, affordable universal healthcare is an idea that is here to stay. Marriage equality is here to stay. You can't discriminate anymore, against anyone. Racism is openly and vehemently exposed and attacked. Women and minorities no longer know their place. Yes, the idealized Conservative America of the 1950s is gone forever. Destroyed. And that is a wonderful thing to celebrate, if you are a good person. Many Republicans, however, are not good people.