We don’t need more guns in Delaware’s state parks

Comments (6)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

1. Jason330 says:

   January 8, 2016 at 11:11 am

   The disconnect between what that 2ndA says and what gun nuts think it means is simply ridiculous. To reverse a 2ndA that describes gun nuts current “thinking” you’d have to write:

   No impediment to any gun ownership, display or gun use will ever be allowed under any circumstances. Any attempt to create any impediment to any gun ownership, display or use will be regarded as an attempt to eliminate all gun ownership, display or gun use.

   It makes no sense whatsoever, but that the their position.

2. pandora says:

   January 8, 2016 at 11:25 am

   “No impediment to any gun ownership, display or gun use by white men will ever be allowed under any circumstances. Any attempt to create any impediment to any gun ownership, display or use by white men will be regarded as an attempt to eliminate all gun ownership, display or gun use.”

   Enhanced that for ya, J! 😉

3. Jason330 says:

   January 8, 2016 at 12:10 pm

   So true. That is the bottom line.

4. Newark Lurker says:

   January 8, 2016 at 2:24 pm

   As columnist Eugene Robinson says, if you want to enact gun safety measures, you just have to start an organization called The National Black Rifle Association”.

5. LeBay says:

   January 8, 2016 at 9:22 pm

   FFS, I’m no gun nut, but if you have a problem with the 2nd amendment, start a movement to REPEAL IT or STFU.

   THAT is the bottom line.

   I own one rifle. I haven’t fired it since 1994. I’d gladly give it up & vote to repeal the 2nd Amendment

6. Liberal Elite says:

   January 9, 2016 at 4:27 am

   @L “start a movement to REPEAL IT or STFU.”

   We don’t need to repeal it. We just need a USSC that reads it the way it was actually written. Elect Hillary and we’ll very likely get such a court.