Tuesday Open Thread [1.26.2016]

Tuesday Open Thread [1.26.2016]

Jeet Heer has says Hillary and Bernie showed different sides of themselves at the Democratic Town Hall Forum last night:
When Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders shared a stage—separately—at Monday night’s Iowa Democratic Forum on CNN, the most noticeable thing was the difference in volume. By reputation, Sanders is a shouter, but on this occasion he came across as much quieter than Clinton, who gave forceful, directed, and impassioned answers to some difficult questions from Iowa Democrats. Both candidates were fighting against stereotypes that voters have formed of them, using a new tone to win over those still wavering before the Iowa caucuses next Monday. And both of them gave, in their different ways, remarkably convincing performances. [...] [O]n the whole, the kinder, gentler Sanders showed that he has a much wider tonal range as a politician than the Larry David stereotype—or some of his rallies—would suggest. It’s likely that this softer Sanders was crafted in no small part to appeal to the rural populations of Iowa and New Hampshire. Rural voters are especially important in Iowa, because of the weight their votes have in the caucus system. Sanders has already won over a considerable number of college students and urbanites, who form his core fan base, so he needs those rural voters to diversify his support. Clinton’s new, fightin’ tone is also aimed at skeptical voters. She’s been accused of being a complacent front-runner and pillar of the establishment. Whether this image is fair or not, Clinton needed to counter it. And so she’s re-cast herself as Hillary Clinton the fighter, the counter-puncher who has had to fight the Republicans her whole life. The theme of a combative Hillary is quite visible in her recent campaign ads, and her performance in the Democratic Forum was designed to reenforce this idea.
General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Tues., Jan. 26, 2016

General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Tues., Jan. 26, 2016

Undaunted by the prospect of blowing yet a greater hole in the budget for the next few years, the State Senate joined the House in passing legislation that would 'remove disincentives' for job creation for the corporate overlords.  The Senate passed the bill with only one 'not voting' (Townsend, who was a co-sponsor on the bill), and the bill goes to the Governor.  Keep this in mind in June when the Honorables (ongoing h/t to Ralph Moyed) shrug their collective shoulders and lament the 'tough choices' (read screw anybody but the corporate overlords) they had to make.  They, of course, didn't have to make them. They made clear that bowing to their corporate overlords is business as usual.  A projected $50 mill shortfall to the budget over the first 2 1/2 years the legislation is in effect.  Just curious: Who, if anybody, will keep track of all those new jobs the corporate overlords will create now that the 'disincentives' have been removed?  Based on previous experience, my prediction is 'Nobody'. A pure unvarnished giveaway. Delaware's 'apology' for its role in perpetuating slavery passed the Senate. Three no votes.  Hocker, Lawson, and Bonini.  None of whom have likely ever cracked a history book and read of Delaware's role in perpetuating slavery.