Delaware Liberal

Why does “supporting Israel” mean supporting Israel’s most bloodthristy warmongers?

I continue to wonder if Mrs. Clinton is running for President in 1988. Her AIPAC remarks appear to have been prepared by a younger, angrier John Bolton.

“As we gather here, three evolving threats — Iran’s continued aggression, a rising tide of extremism across a wide arc of instability, and the growing effort to de-legitimize Israel on the world stage — are converging to make the U.S.-Israel alliance more indispensable than ever.We have to combat all these trends with even more intense security and diplomatic cooperation. The United States and Israel must be closer than ever, stronger than ever and more determined than ever to prevail against our common adversaries and to advance our shared values.”

Touting her “deep, personal commitment” to the “Jewish state,” Clinton then said that “one of the first things I’ll do in office is invite Israeli Prime Minister [Benjamin Netanyahu] to visit the White House.”

The speech proved that, on matters of Israel, Clinton is “running to the right” of GOP front-runner Donald Trump, as noted by Mondoweiss’ Philip Weiss, who wrote that the remarks were “filled with red meat for Israel supporters” and “contained scant reference to the peace process.”

Iran’s continued aggression?
Benjamin Netanyahu?

I’m sure glad Bernie is “pulling Clinton toward the center”. Imagine where she’d be on American/Israeli exceptionalism without Sanders in the race.

Exit mobile version