As you’ve heard by now, the National Enquirer tried to blackmail Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos, threatening to publish his dick pics if he didn’t back off investigating AMI, the Enquirer’s corporate parent. Judging by what I’ve seen in print, people aren’t surprised at the sleaziness of this; it was revealed months ago that the publication paid a Trump paramour for her story specifically so they could kill it, so it’s not shocking to find they work both sides of that street.
But nobody has picked up on what a boon this could be for journalism’s flagging fortunes. Why peddle subscriptions for a few dollars a month when you could be extorting story subjects for hundreds of thousands of dollars?
Back when Tom Gordon was county executive and Sherry Freebery his assistant, there were constant rumors that they were romantically involved. The solons at The News Journal insisted this was none of the public’s business, which was just as absurd a contention then as it is now.* Imagine if, instead of ignoring this, they had set about investigating it — not to publish what they found, but to generate income by threatening to reveal what they found. And those two are far from the only ones. Lots of lawmakers turn into bedfellows. Why write stories about it when you can blackmail the adulterers instead?
Granted, this would mean dropping actual reporters, who have to be able to write, in favor of private investigators, who just have to snap grainy photos, but this seems to be what the masses are more interested in anyway.