Joe Biden Caused More Harm To Minorities Than Any Other D In Recent Memory

Filed in Delaware, Featured by on July 2, 2019

Busing was only a small part of it. Although that’s important. A lot of blacks didn’t like busing either, and a lot of whites hated it. Which can in no way forgive Biden’s defense of ‘state’s rights’ and ‘voluntary busing’. As if states that sent his segregationist friends to DC were going to do anything voluntarily to end ‘separate but unequal’ schools. So, Joe, in order to give you a bit of a pass on ‘forced busing’ and in order to help you to further your claims to be a civil rights champion, just what did you propose to put an end to separate but unequal schools back in the ’70’s? I was here, and I can’t remember.

I’m asking because I believe that his claim to be a civil rights champion is, what’s the word I’m looking for, a lie. 

In fact, far worse, far worse, than his opposition to busing is/was the unforgivable Biden Crime Bill of 1994. Biden defends the bill by claiming that the bill, in and of itself, did not cause mass incarceration.  However, in fact, it was inevitable that mass incarceration of minorities would happen under the bill.  Here’s one of several pieces that places the bill in context:

Your (Biden’s) recent comments that it didn’t create mass incarceration are correct. But that is not the point. Mass incarceration had been building for some time, especially when it came to people of color. But what is pretty indisputable is that the 1994 Crime Bill, as it is called, single-handedly contributed to a massive increase in incarceration and injustice to them.

I’m still scratching my head trying to understand your “pivot” that seems to claim that the individual states — who had the job of implementing the bill — caused most of the problems because of the way they chose to execute the law.

What the states didn’t misinterpret was the more than $8 billion the law allotted to them to encourage building more prisons and/or to change existing prisons to accommodate more “clients.” It created a virtual feeding frenzy for the cash, and helped contribute to a rapid rise and expansion of a whole new prison industrial complex, including oppressive privatized prisons.

The new law even supplied the states with tools to help keep those shiny new prisons filled to the brim. Among them the introduction of the “three strikes” proviso, which in most cases automatically sealed one’s fate almost without benefit of appeal. The “truth in sentencing” clause tied the hands of judges from exploring circumstances that could affect early release. The implementation of mandatory minimums and getting rid of parole seemed designed to insure those in prison would stay there longer.

And Delaware sure jumped on this bill to enact the most draconian sentencing laws imaginable. Led by four powerful advocates for racial resentment–Sen. Tom Sharp, Sen. Jim Vaughn, Rep. Wayne Smith, and AG Jane Brady. We still haven’t completely rid from the Delaware Code the damage that they–and Biden–caused.

Joe, as a champion of civil rights, what was your motivation for pushing this bill? I’d like to know. I don’t believe that there has been, over the past 50 years, a single bill pushed by Democrats that has done more harm to the minority community than the Biden Crime Bill of 1994. Even Bill Clinton apologized for it, as he knew it would be an anchor around Hillary’s neck. But you haven’t, and you’re counting on residual support from the black community for having been Barack’s sidekick as a means of getting the D nomination.

Folks (h/t to Biden), there’s a reason he won’t apologize. And it’s the same reason why Obama put him on the ticket in the first place.  Biden provided enough cover for Obama among the white police/firefighter/construction trade crowd that was Biden’s base.  Cops loved locking up poor black kids.  Biden is still appealing to them with dog whistles.

He can’t win the nomination with just the so-called white working class.  He needs minorities. The busing flap with Kamala Harris put a dent into their support. Next time, Kamala, Bernie, Liz, et al, go after him for the crime bill. It’s the softest target imaginable.

That will be the end for Joe Biden. To paraphrase from Shakespeare:”If it is to be done, ’tis best that it’s done quickly.’

 

About the Author ()

Comments (15)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Lash larue says:

    So weird none of this came up between the years of 2007-2017.

    • Alby says:

      They don’t release the oppo research on losers.

      Do you think it was weird that nobody made any big deal about a sitting U.S. Senator calling himself a socialist? Because nobody did until Bernie ran for president.

      Perhaps you can detect a pattern there.

    • You DO see the vulnerability, right? A guy proclaiming himself to be a civil rights champion who has little but having been Barack’s goofy sidekick upon which to make that claim.

      That his civil rights record would undergo scrutiny due to those circumstances should surprise nobody. But it seems to have surprised Biden.

  2. I suspect, but don’t know, that the crime bill was what made it difficult for Biden to appeal to a broad enough base to have any traction in the 2008 primary campaign.

    In Delaware about that time, the first alarm bells had gone off about the mass incarcerations. The first to do so was a (very) conservative D senator from Sussex County. Sen. Bob Venables chaired the Bond Bill Committee, and he warned that all of the costs for prison expansion were robbing the state of the ability to build and upgrade schools and roads.

  3. CinqueB says:

    You could just call him a parrot.

  4. All Seeing says:

    The crime bill left out rehabilitation. They wanted to use every bit of the money to keep the feeding frenzy going. The crime bill was written here by Joe’s buddies for Bill Clinton. Joe is his own worst enemy. Here’s what another publication has to say “JOE is Finished = https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/7/1/1868796/-Kos-declares-Biden-finished-while-Nate-Silver-warns-us-to-be-cautious

  5. bamboozer says:

    Hoping Joe, and Bernie are finished, both for different reasons but gone none the less. Remember Joe’s “Crime & Drugs” run for the presidency very well, found it contemptable as was the whole “Get tough on crime!” era that led to mass incarceration.

    • John Kowalko says:

      You might want to check out Kamala Harris’ prosecutorial record and enthusiasm for lack of empathy toward minority offenders.
      Representative John Kowalko

  6. John Kowalko says:

    My support and preference is for the one candidate who has consistently supported liberal idealism and has offered numerous policies and policy changes to accomplish fairness and equal treatment for all and that is Bernie Sanders. Elizabeth Warren is my very close second choice.
    John Kowalko

    • Tom Kline says:

      Big shocker coming from something that feeds off Taxpayers…

      • Yo, TK, GREAT concept for a walking dead flick…a bunch’a zombie politicians going around eating taxpayers. Wouldn’t it be great to see them ascending to the manses in Greenville? Octogenarian matrons being voraciously devoured, faux pearls spit out?

        You’re welcome. Just give me a screenwriting credit, won’tcha?

  7. RSE says:

    “They are often the kinds of kids that are called superpredators — no conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why they ended up that way, but first, we have to bring them to heel.”…Hillary Clinton

    Activists called for her to apologize for that remark…she never did. Speaking about those words later Hillary admitted…”I wouldn’t use them today”.