‘State’s Rights’ On Abortion Comes Home To Roost In Arizona
I think you can cross Arizona off your list of competitive states for November. Check this out from the NY Times:
Arizona’s highest court on Tuesday upheld an 1864 law that bans nearly all abortions, a decision that could have far-reaching consequences for women’s health care and election-year politics in a critical battleground state. The 1864 law, the court said in a 4-2 decision, “is now enforceable.” But the court put its ruling on hold for the moment, and sent the matter back to a lower court to hear additional arguments about the law’s constitutionality.
The Arizona Supreme Court said that because the federal right to abortion in Roe v. Wade had been overturned, there was no federal or state law preventing Arizona from enforcing the near-total ban on abortions, which had sat dormant for decades.
The ruling concerned a law that was on the books long before Arizona achieved statehood. It outlaws abortion from the moment of conception, except when necessary to save the life of the mother, and it makes no exceptions for rape or incest. Doctors prosecuted under the law could face fines and prison terms of two to five years.
The 1864 ban had sat mothballed for decades, one of several sweeping state abortion-ban laws that were moribund while Roe v. Wade was in effect but became the focus of intense political and legal action after Roe fell.
A proposed constitutional amendment declaring abortion a ‘fundamental right’ could be on the ballot in Arizona in November. Whether it is or isn’t, I believe that today’s decision puts the state in the Biden column and dooms Kari Lake’s candidacy for the Senate.
States’ rights, hell no. Territorial rights, yes!!!
Hey, if we’re going back to 1864, might as well legalize slavery again. And doctors who violate the law could be enslaved for two to five years.
A careful reading of the 13th Amendment already allows this.