Charlie Kirk, In His Own Words
Before the canonization proceeds any further, let’s let Oliver Willis set the record straight:
In 2023, Kirk said, “It’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.”
Kirk said in 2018 that gun violence in Chicago was the fault of “a lack-of-father problem in the Black community.”
In 2024, he launched a campaign attacking the legacy of revered civil rights icon Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Kirk said King was “[a] myth has been created and it has grown totally out of control.” At a conference he held the previous year, Kirk said King was “awful” and “not a good person.”
Kirk claimed that the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 had become a “beast” and is an “anti-white weapon.”
In 2023, Kirk said, “I don’t believe Black History Month is worth the kind of full month that it is, at all.” He said the celebration “only deepens any sort of racial wounds and creates more bigotry.”
Kirk was a promoter of the racist “great replacement” conspiracy theory, which falsely claims Latino migrants are attempting to replace white people. As part of that crusade in August, he falsely accused Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett, who is Black, of engaging in an “attempt to eliminate the white population in this country.”
In Kirk’s eyes, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman to serve on the court, was an “unqualified” nominee and the “recipient of affirmative action.”
Following flooding in Texas in July, Kirk said the “death toll likely would not have been as high if it wasn’t for DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion].”
During a discussion of gay rights in 2024, Kirk referenced the Bible and noted that passages indicating “lay with another man and be stoned to death” were “God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters.”
Discussing Trump’s presidential campaign in 2024, Kirk urged his favored candidate to trigger “Nuremberg-style” trials for doctors performing gender-affirming care if he won. The Nuremberg trials were post-World War II court trials that sought to prosecute leaders of Nazi Germany for crimes against humanity.
Kirk described transgender people as “groomers,” and said transgender children were “mutilat[ing]” their bodies. He also called for transgender athletes to be physically confronted for the purported sin of trying to play sports.
Kirk also used antisemitic stereotypes as part of his broadcasts. In one show, he said, “Jewish dollars” had funded “Cultural Marxist ideas.” In another, he invoked the longstanding antisemitic trope of Jewish control of colleges, Hollywood, and nonprofit groups.
During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, Kirk said vaccine requirements were “medical apartheid” and used his group to oppose vaccination. Kirk also peddled the baseless conspiracy that 1.2 million people died from vaccinations.
In other words, Kirk peddled hatred of the ‘other’ to college-age students all over the country, and made a great living doing it. No, he didn’t deserve to die by an assassin’s bullet, but he was a toxic piece of shit who contributed to the ongoing Fascist takeover of America.


I intend to draw a very small face on a large balloon that I will release in his honor.
BTW, Delaware flags at half-staff:
https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/politics/2025/09/10/flags-across-delaware-lowered-to-half-staff-after-charlie-kirks-death/86085067007/
Just curious–were Delaware flags ordered at half-staff when the Minnesota legislators were assassinated? (They might have been, I honestly don’t know. I know that Trump did not order Federal flags lowered.)
Or is this an honor only accorded to right-wing hate-mongering ‘influencers’?
Joan Walsh on TheNation:
Author Mark Harris said it better than I could on Bluesky: “You can write this only if, by virtue of your income, identity, or both, you are utterly removed from the consequences of politics. To pretend that the racist, misogynistic, anti-gay vileness that Kirk spent his life spreading is secondary to the fact that he spread it ‘the right way’ is appalling.”
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/charlie-kirk-assassination-tragedy/tnamp/
https://newrepublic.com/article/200327/charlie-kirk-empathy-trap-democrats
Wow, that New Republic piece is absolutely right on.
Highly-recommended reading.
Excellent piece. Your summary is right on the nose.
I love missing context.