Sooo I guess Petraeus hates America too?

Filed in National by on May 26, 2009

I wonder when Hannitty and the rest of the GOP will slam the general for his rhetoric to make America less safe:

h/t crooksandliars.com

“With respect to Guantanamo,” Petraeus added, “I think that the closure in a responsible manner, obviously one that is certainly being worked out now by the Department of Justice — I talked to the Attorney General the other day [and] they have a very intensive effort ongoing to determine, indeed, what to do with the detainees who are left, how to deal with them in a legal way, and if continued incarceration is necessary — again, how to take that forward. But doing that in a responsible manner, I think, sends an important message to the world, as does the commitment of the United States to observe the Geneva Convention when it comes to the treatment of detainees.”

About the Author ()

hiding in the open

Comments (13)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Another DFH against torture.

    So, will the GOP purge Petraeus now? I’ve noticed how many military people have come out against torture and against Guantanamo. Why do Republicans hate our troops?

  2. pandora says:

    He’ll be called a traitor in ten… nine… eight…

  3. I am not seeing the issue. Naturally the General would confer to ensure that what he is doing continues to be legal and proper. If we go by the Geneva Conventions, we don’t need trials for military captures to detain them only to punish them(which can be military tribunals) nor do we need to release them before the war is over. We can question unlawful combatants. I don’t see a difference from what we have been doing for the last 4 years. It seems like you all are moving closer to a third Bush term. I just hope that you get a move on before we endanger this country by the administration’s delay.

  4. meatball says:

    Commie!

  5. cassandra_m says:

    The General would like to see the closure of Guantanamo — something that BushCo gave occasional lip service to, but who were not concerned about doing. But he not Delusional David for nothing.

    ps. So how long ’til Mr. Shallow Bench gets here to opine that the General is as misinformed as General Powell?

  6. Cassandra,

    Mr. Shallow Bench has to wait for the GOP talking points to come in before he can comment.

  7. cassandra_m says:

    Well Delusional David has his talking points!

  8. Susan Regis Collins says:

    Why reinvent the wheel? Treat the so-called detainees the same way German military were treated after WWII……the Hague will decide.

  9. Yeah, like the Europeans will take them. They don’t even want their own citizens. Why do you think we have people at Gitmo?

  10. we have them at gitmo because we tortured the ever living shit it out of them and now they are crazy as hell and beyond repair mentally.

    And they haven’t even been in court to decide if they are guilty….do you ever get tired of being wrong?

  11. Art Downs says:

    Flag Rank officers are loathe to directly disagree with policy makers so the General must make nice.

    There was an ‘Admiral’s Revolt’ during the Truman Era when the follies of SecDef Louis Johnson put the Nation at risk. Careers were ended but Johnson eventually got the boot.

    In period where there is no general war, high ranking officers need to play a lot of politics to survive and get promoted. Meeting some social quota may be more important than winning a battle.

  12. We have people at Gitmo because we were trying to hold them in some kind of extra-legal limbo, remember? They put the prisoners at Gitmo and then tried to argue that Gitmo wasn’t U.S. territory so the prisoners weren’t subject to U.S. laws. That got slapped down by the courts.

  13. anonie says:

    Just as importantlu, General Petraeus countered former Vice President Dick Cheney’s recent claim that Obama’s administration had made America less safe.

    “I wouldn’t necessarily agree with that,” said the general, who has served under both administrations. “I think that there is in fact a good debate going on about the importance of values in everything we do. If one violates the values we hold so dear, we jeopardize our troops.”

    Personally, I believe Cheney’s “national security” issue is a set up. If we are attacked (8 years is a long time), he will use modest security changes as an excuse to blame Obama and the democrats for the attack, not the fact that we took our eyes off al-qaeda by attacking Iraq.