I Wish Al Gore Had Been Appointed President
Al Gore has a new slideshow on climate change. He has some stunning updates to his Inconvenient Truth. It is a 28 minute video, but it is chock full of good data and some pretty funny commentary. Even better, it can be downloaded and there is even an iPod ready download.
But think, if the Supreme Court HAD appointed Al Gore President, then he wouldn’t have had the soul-crushing amount of free time that let him concentrate on the Global Warming Crisis©, and we still be slowly strangling Mother Earth. There would have been no slide show.
Fortunately, George Bush was elected president in 2000! 🙂
The Other Dana,
Are you for real? You honestly think that Bush is doing a good job?
C’mon man. Put down your burden. You have been carrying it for long enough. It is okay to admit that Bush has been an absolute disaster.
Jason: In most areas, President Bush has done pretty much just what I would have wanted him to do. His judicial appointments have been good, he fought back against the Islamic fascists, and he cut taxes. My only complaint is that he failed to rein in federal spending on domestic programs and pork.
If President Bush could run again, I’d vote for him again.
You, Sir, are a crackpot.
Jason 330
May I be sooooo bold as to suggest that in the future you monitor (not Garrett)Dana’s posts or forward them to FSP.
He is afterall unAmerican as he approves of our Constitution/Bill of Rights being trashed and approves of torture (a tip of the hat to Torturin’ Tom Carper on that one).
Yeah Birdie.
I just don’t see where wing-nuts get the stamina to be so wrong about so much for so long.
It is like they have some kind of disorder that makes them go into wing-nut overdrive when they are proven wrong.
They just can’t give up on anything. Take McCains pledge to stay in Iraq for 100 years.
Now wing-nuts are trying to say that it makes sense – cuz, “afterall we still occupy the Confederacy.”
I wish I was kidding.
Little Birdie: Were you to visit my site, you’d find that we have great respect for our Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and view them as much more absolute than some of our friends on the left. Where the First Amendment says that “Congress shall make no law” regarding the freedom of speech or the press or religion, we believe that it means precisely that: Congress shall make no law.
When it comes to the Second Amendment, where it says that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,” we believe that it means just that, “shall not be infringed.”
When it comes to the Fourteenth Amendment, where it says that “no state shall . . . deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws,” we believe that it means exactly that, and not that a state may deny the equal protection of the laws to some people to serve some perceived social good.
Why, thank you, Jason. I explained my reasons for approving most of President Bush’s tenure, and you responded not with skilled debating points, but with skilled reparté.
I stand in awe of your brilliant wit.
Dana: So you believe in three? What about the rest of the US Constitution.? I also believe your reasoning with the Fourteenth Amemdment is a bit shaky. IMHO
The Consitution has been put on hold by the current regime! Patriot acts shredded it, the Supremes and the Congress under repuke control shelved it! “its just a piece of paper”. GWARbush.
Mr C: I gave three examples; that doesn’t mean I have a problem with the rest of it — though, if I could, I’d repeal the Sixteenth Amendment.