Friday Open Thread

Filed in National by on October 15, 2010

Welcome to your Friday open thread. Well, it’s been an eventful week. What’s on your mind?

Gee, despite what Republicans are saying, Americans do care about who’s funding all these political ads. I hope Democrats keep hitting hard on this topic.

But a new poll commissioned by MoveOn, and done by the respected non-partisan firm Survey USA, strongly suggests that the issue may indeed matter a good deal to voters after all.

The poll finds that two thirds of registered voters, or 66 percent, are aware that outside groups are behind some of the ads they’re seeing. This makes sense, since the issue has dominated the media amid the battle over the huge ad onslaught against Dems funded by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Karl Rove’s groups.

What’s more, an overwhelming 84 percent say they have a “right to know” who’s bankrolling the ads. And crucially, the poll also found that the issue is resonant when linked to the economy. A majority, 53 percent, are less likely to think a candidate who is backed by “anonymous groups” can be trusted to “improve economic conditions” for them or their families. People don’t believe these groups are looking out for their interests.

Yesterday a judge in Florida allowed the states’ lawsuit against health care reform to go forward, including the challenge to the individual mandate. On the same day, Republican pollster Bill McInturff wrote that Republicans need to be very careful with “repeal and replace.”

As the November elections approach, House Republican leaders are trying to capitalize on public dislike of the new health-care law – about half of voters oppose it – by vowing to “repeal and replace” it. But that’s a risky approach for individual GOP candidates, warns Republican pollster Bill McInturff, a partner of Public Opinion Strategies, a national political and public affairs survey research firm. The reason: Many people already are enjoying some popular new benefits, which include allowing adult children to remain on parents’ policies until the age of 26 and a prohibition on insurers’ rescinding coverage when people get sick.

McInturff has been urging Republicans to use a more moderate message: Keep what’s good in the law and replace what’s not. He says new polling that he will release Friday shows that this approach works.

Q.If there’s significant opposition to the health-reform law, then why would it hurt candidates to promise a full repeal?

If you’re for repeal and replace, it means you have to say that every single element of health care is something you disagree with, or at least allows your opponent to characterize your position that way. That seems to me to not make much sense.

Number two, people are very conscious that we fought for a year about this. And so . . . telling people that we’re going to start totally from scratch and do it again, there’s a certain kind of weariness about the process.

And number three, and importantly, right now we’re not really fighting about health care. If you look at most Republican advertising and most of the issue-advocacy advertising that relates to health care, it’s being used as a proof point about cost and the role of government, and it’s a pretty powerful proof point.

Yes, Democrats have already characterized “repeal and replace” as a return to recission, pre-existing condition exclusion and lifetime caps. I’ve noticed that both Christine O’Donnell and Glen Urquhart say they want to “repeal and replace” the health care law with…the health care law.

Tags:

About the Author ()

Opinionated chemist, troublemaker, blogger on national and Delaware politics.

Comments (19)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. anonone says:

    For El Som and anybody else who needs a break:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Us-TVg40ExM

  2. Joe Cass says:

    Its all grassroots. right? Its astroturf.

  3. liberalgeek says:

    A1 – that was great. Thanks.

  4. Joe Cass says:

    Anyone listening to POTUS on WILM?

  5. Another Mike says:

    I guess COD is doing local media. From the WGMD website: Christine O’Donnell on WGMD today at 3pm LIVE from Fisherman’s Wharf by the drawbridge in Lewes. Bill Colley interviewing her there.

    I guess Dan Gaffney is off limits after his interview in which he pointed out, you know, the truth.

  6. V says:

    Kaufman called Coons “the witch-slayer” at the Obama fundraiser.

    It was a pretty good time.

  7. MJ says:

    Just what I needed today. Thank you very much, A1.

  8. anon says:

    The General:

    “O’Donnell is without a doubt one of the greatest witches ever to run for political office, as evidenced by her wizardry in shrinking Sean Hannity down to the size of a wallet “

  9. MJ says:

    If you want to listen to a bunch of bullshit, go to wgmd.com and click “listen live” and listen to O’Whack-a-Mole talk to Curly. Cotton will stop the bleeding in your ears after prolonged exposure to this tripe.

  10. Polemical says:

    Btw, how RARE to see two ‘Kenyan Anti-Colonialists’ on one stage ;)I’m sure Newt is sending money to the Chamber of Commerce as we speak! lol!

  11. anon says:

    Uh… I just listened to CoD with Colley… ears bleeding, more lies.

    She repeated the lie that Coons wants all the Bush tax cuts to expire.

    She repeated the innumeracy about taxes going up for the “average family” (a number which some wingnut got by averaging the tax increases for the rich across all families).

    She brought up a new twist, which was a lie, on the theme that people making $250K are small businesses – she said the tax increase applies to small businesses who gross $250K BEFORE they pay employees and expenses. What a freaking dummy.

    And judging by the crowd noise, the crowd ate it up. Amazingly, there was even a group of yahoos to the RIGHT of Christine: Colley mentioned abolishing the Dept. of Ed, and cheers went up from the gallery, but CoD tap danced away from it.

  12. Boxwood says:

    I don’r suppose they got around to talking about less important things like bank reform did they anon?

  13. anon says:

    No. The phone callers were even worse.

  14. MJ says:

    I was going to crash the party, but I think they were controlling access to the restaurant so there wouldn’t be any naysayers in the crowd. Would have been fun, though.

    Anon – did Grace from Georgetown call? She’s a hoot.

  15. jason330 says:

    Why doesn’t Delawareliberal have a wikipedia page? That would be the SHizzle!!

  16. Joe Cass says:

    Maybe COD has a point to be proud about NOT attending Yale

  17. Aoine says:

    MJ – I do not know HOW you isten ot that drivel…..it really does make my ears bleed
    If it was not for the fact that I CARE about the safety of other drivers on the road or crashing my car, I might listen…

    I can read and respond…however I like the way I strike back as it is…..stealth

  18. Belinsky says:

    No fair. During the Yankees’ 5-run comeback in the 8th inning, the camera focused several times on Rangers managing partner Nolan Ryan as the Texas lead melted, but not on the Rangers fan next to him, who used to be the Rangers managing partner, and later the president of the United States.

    Would have been like seeing him watch the 2006 election returns.