Chris Coons Sounds Like a Real Democrat on Repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

Filed in National by on December 11, 2010

I have to say that I love this no nonsense statement from Chris Coons: “We were closer to a repeal this week than we’d ever been, but just as they did when they blocked the unemployment insurance extension for millions of out-of-work Americans, Senate Republicans hijacked this issue as part of their war on progress.”

(Notice how he called the Republicans the douche bags that they are?)

Here is the whole thing.

It was hard to watch nearly all my Republican colleagues step into the well of the Senate and vote against the Defense Authorization bill yesterday, but not because I suddenly expected to see a break in their pattern of reckless obstructionism. Rather, it was hard because of the horrendous message the Senate was sending to our brave men and women in uniform and to each and every gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered American.

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is discrimination, plain and simple. Any American prepared to die for his or her country deserves our respect and admiration. Sexual orientation should not be a factor in determining one’s right to serve.

We were closer to a repeal this week than we’d ever been, but just as they did when they blocked the unemployment insurance extension for millions of out-of-work Americans, Senate Republicans hijacked this issue as part of their war on progress. This, despite the fact that a repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell apparently has the support of super-majority of Senators, including at least three Republicans.

Thursday’s vote didn’t fail because a repeal was bad policy. It failed because, for Republicans, it was bad politics.

Refusing the funding our troops need in a time of war is unconscionable and distasteful. By blocking the Defense Authorization bill, Republicans have deprived our military of more than $700 billion in authorized funds for a pay-raise for troops, an extension of Tricare benefits, and needed equipment in Afghanistan and Iraq. While I’m hopeful that the Defense budget will eventually be authorized, the changing composition of the Senate and the House prevents me from saying the same about a repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell next year.

This is a critical, unique moment and though this opportunity is fleeting, it’s not over yet.

I believe that a repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell deserves a chance at a straight up-or-down vote, safely protected from the crossfire of the debate over a potential extension of the Bush tax cuts.

That’s what S. 4022 — a standalone version of the repeal introduced by Senators Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins Thursday night — aims to do. They believe, as I do, that separating Don’t Ask Don’t Tell from the larger Defense Authorization bill will give us a better chance of passing a repeal.

I was proud to join Senators Reid, Leahy, Gillibrand, Lincoln, and Mark Udall in co-sponsoring the Lieberman-Collins bill, which approaches the repeal in the reasonable, measured manner recommended by Secretary Gates and Admiral Mullen last week while testifying before the Armed Services Committee. They both voiced support for a repeal and underscored the importance of giving the Pentagon the time it needs to implement this policy change in a deliberate, responsible manner.

Passage of S. 4022 would set in motion a series of steps designed to do just that. The repeal would be enacted 60 days after the President, Secretary of Defense and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certify to Congress three things. First, that they have considered the Pentagon working group report on the impact of a DADT repeal. Second, that the Department of Defense has readied the necessary regulations for implementation and third, that the manner of implementation is consistent with the standards of military readiness, effectiveness, unit cohesion, and recruiting and retention.

Congress wouldn’t dictate a timeline for obtaining that certification, but rather this bill gives our military leaders the time they need to ensure a smooth execution of the repeal.

That preparation time would likely not be so generous — if any was granted at all — if a federal judge orders the repeal because Congress chose not to act before going home for the holidays. Secretary Gates, Admiral Mullen, and all five service chiefs were unanimous last week in warning against a court decision on Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

Though these were my first weeks as a Senator, it is clear to me that history will judge our actions in the final days of this lame duck session. I strongly believe that LGBT equality is a pivotal civil rights issue and that repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is an important step in communicating that the government of the United States no longer sanctions active discrimination against a segment of its population.

Our brave men and women in uniform are willing to fight for our freedom every day. It’s our responsibility to keep fighting for theirs.

I don’t know all the ins and outs of the stand alone bill, but this statement gives me hope that Coons is going to be a Senate Democrat, and not whatever form of politic scum that Tom Caper is.

About the Author ()

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

Comments (11)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. I’m glad you posted on this. This was a great statement by Chris Coons and he didn’t pull any punches. Go Chris!

  2. PBaumbach says:

    several times during the campaign Chris noted clearly that DADT repeal was one of the first issues he hoped to help achieve. I, too, am very pleased that he is delivering (at least he is backing up his words with his energies, even if Republicans and some Dems continue to champion discrimination).

    I agree–Go, Chris!

  3. jason330 says:

    Can you imagine the wishy-washy bullshit that would have been emanating from a Mike Castle Senate orifice ?

    I get chills thinking about it. Thank you Tbagz!! THANK YOU CHRISTINE!!!

  4. anon says:

    Republicans no longer really care about DADT. They only use gay rights issues as wedges to win elections. But we are in a new era now where Republicans no longer need to win elections to implement their agenda. Repubs will continue to fight us on the social issues out of habit, but they no longer really care. It is a giant red herring.

    Thanks for the fighting talk though, Senator Coons. Save some for taxes.

  5. jason330 says:

    Good point. At least it is a signal that he does not want to be too closely identified with the ruling party.

  6. Zentrails says:

    Thank you Chris Coons.
    Something tells me this guy is going to make one heckuva good senator.

  7. kavips says:

    Refusing the funding our troops need in a time of war is unconscionable and distasteful. By blocking the Defense Authorization bill, Republicans have deprived our military of more than $700 billion in authorized funds for a pay-raise for troops, an extension of Tricare benefits, and needed equipment in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    It shows the Republicans finest moment. This is a moment we can package and carry to the voters in two years….

    “Republicans refused to fund our troops in the middle of combat operations, because the military felt forced to implement a policy, that Republicans, and only they, didn’t like. “

  8. Truth Teller says:

    There are two parts to DADT we all know the punishment for telling so if a person speaks out and declares he’s or she is gay out they go. When a person is outed by a third party then someone has to ask him or her if it’s true. So what is the punishment for asking and has it ever been inforced?

  9. Boxwood says:

    @kavips. I’d rather remember the Democrats for ending the war in Afghanistan (and bringing our troops home) than how hard they fought to continue funding it. /jmo

  10. delacrat says:

    Amen, Boxwood.