Armed And Thinking

Filed in National by on January 12, 2011

I think Joe Zamudio was very lucky and very wise in his split second decision making.  Please read the entire article.

If you haven’t heard about Mr. Zamudio, he’s the guy who heard the shots fired and ran toward them.  He was armed.

But before we embrace Zamudio’s brave intervention as proof of the value of being armed, let’s hear the whole story. “I came out of that store, I clicked the safety off, and I was ready,” he explained on Fox and Friends. “I had my hand on my gun. I had it in my jacket pocket here. And I came around the corner like this.” Zamudio demonstrated how his shooting hand was wrapped around the weapon, poised to draw and fire. As he rounded the corner, he saw a man holding a gun. “And that’s who I at first thought was the shooter,” Zamudio recalled. “I told him to ‘Drop it, drop it!’ ”

But the man with the gun wasn’t the shooter. He had wrested the gun away from the shooter. “Had you shot that guy, it would have been a big, fat mess,” the interviewer pointed out.

Zamudio agreed.

I think Zamudio’s bravery is tied to the fact that he ran towards the shots, not that he was armed.   The reason he didn’t pull out his gun?  “He didn’t want to be confused as a second gunman.”  Like I said… a very wise, young man.

The Arizona Daily Star, based on its interview with Zamudio, adds two details to the story. First, upon seeing the man with the gun, Zamudio “grabbed his arm and shoved him into a wall” before realizing he wasn’t the shooter. And second, one reason why Zamudio didn’t pull out his own weapon was that “he didn’t want to be confused as a second gunman.”

This is a much more dangerous picture than has generally been reported. Zamudio had released his safety and was poised to fire when he saw what he thought was the killer still holding his weapon. Zamudio had a split second to decide whether to shoot. He was sufficiently convinced of the killer’s identity to shove the man into a wall. But Zamudio didn’t use his gun. That’s how close he came to killing an innocent man. He was, as he acknowledges, “very lucky.”

That’s what happens when you run with a firearm to a scene of bloody havoc. In the chaos and pressure of the moment, you can shoot the wrong person. Or, by drawing your weapon, you can become the wrong person—a hero mistaken for a second gunman by another would-be hero with a gun. Bang, you’re dead. Or worse, bang bang bang bang bang: a firefight among several armed, confused, and innocent people in a crowd. It happens even among trained soldiers. Among civilians, the risk is that much greater.

So, can we please drop the Chuck Norris fantasy scenarios?  You know… the ones where the day is saved by citizens pulling out their guns and taking the shooter (and only the shooter) down.  Seriously, they’re just silly.

Mr. Zamudio’s a hero in my book because he didn’t use his gun – He used his head.

Tags: ,

About the Author ()

A stay-at-home mom with an obsession for National politics.

Comments (5)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Dirty Girl says:

    better llink this story to Bill Colley on WGMD

    He says had HE been there he would have been firing at the shooter

    another poster suggested that in reality he would have been cowering on the ground soiling himself

    I’m inclined to believe the latter

    any how – here is a good article:

    http://www.capegazette.com/storiescurrent/201101-01-15/11001-hate-speech.html

  2. I have no idea why some people think turning incidents like these into shootout at the OK Corral is the answer. Even if Giffords had been armed, Loughner came up behind her. His gun clip had 30 rounds which he fired quickly. No one could have drawn their gun in that time.

  3. socialistic ben says:

    every single conservative thinks they would act the same way. but the truth is most of em are idiots like palin who would just fire blindly until everyone is applauding them.

  4. paratrooper18 says:

    Because all conservatives are John Wayne. It is the conservatives who are gung ho for the troops and military conflict but never served, the same ones.