Tuesday Open Thread

Filed in National by on May 3, 2011

I’m traveling this week. I’m in Boston so this space may be intentionally left blank.

Hey, stuff!

Science rules!

Could Osama bin Laden have been found faster if the CIA had followed the advice of ecosystem geographers from the University of California, Los Angeles? Probably not, but the predictions of UCLA geographer Thomas Gillespie, who, along with colleague John Agnew and a class of undergraduates, authored a 2009 paper predicting the terrorist’s whereabouts, were none too shabby. According to a probabilistic model they created, there was an 80.9% chance that bin Laden was hiding out in Abbottabad, Pakistan, where he was killed last night. And they correctly predicted that he would be in a large town, not a cave.

The bin Laden tracking idea began as a project in an undergraduate class on remote sensing that Gillespie, whose expertise is using remote sensing data from satellites to study ecosystems, taught in 2009. Based on information from satellites and other remote sensing systems, and reports on his movements since his last known location, the students created a probabilistic model of where he was likely to be. Their prediction of a town was based on a geographical theory called “island biogeography”: basically, that a species on a large island is much less likely to go extinct following a catastrophic event than a species on a small one.

“The theory was basically that if you’re going to try and survive, you’re going to a region with a low extinction rate: a large town,” Gillespie says. “We hypothesized he wouldn’t be in a small town where people could report on him.”

In the end, they zeroed in on a Pakistani border town called Parachinar which has, among other things, access to medical care. Then they predicted the exact building he would be in by making assumptions as to the characteristics of the building itself, such as high enough ceilings to accommodate bin Laden’s 6’4” frame, a fence, privacy, and electricity.

I don’t know whether the CIA took this analysis into account but it’s eerie how accurate it is. One thing that bothers me is how bin Laden lived in the lap of luxury only miles away from Pakistan’s military academy. I guess that whole living in caves stuff was a bit of spy-ops.

Tags:

About the Author ()

Opinionated chemist, troublemaker, blogger on national and Delaware politics.

Comments (6)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. jason330 says:

    I enjoy how this OBL story continues to point out the many ways Bush sucked at being President.

  2. cassandra_m says:

    Steve Benen has another reminder of how horrible BushCo was as President. This time featuring Condi Rice falling into line and repeating the same tired BS on the same tired leadership of George W. Bush.

  3. jason330 says:

    Picture a venn diagram with two circles. One labeled “What Republicans Believe Happened” and the other labeled “What Actually Happened”

    Those circles never overlapped much, but now the circles are moving apart at a startling rate. In a few days you’d need a piece of paper the size of a football field to accurately render the diagram.

    “Remember, in the Bush/Cheney administration, Condoleezza Rice was considered one of the least ridiculous figures.”

    So much for that.

  4. cassandra_m says:

    NPR is 40 years old today — and they are asking people to help them celebrate by changing their avatar to an NPR image and (EDIT) *tweet* post in their profile what NPR personality you’d most like to have cake with.

  5. MJ says:

    It’s interesting that the Washington Times missed the OBL story yesterday and had to run a second morning edition. And of course, their sub-header is “Obama fulfills Bush Goal.”

    Then again, what would you expect from the voice of the Rev. Moon.

  6. Jason330 says:

    For Palin, a politician known for crazy-ass nonsense, this pushes the envelope.

    Palin Defends Billions in Tax Payments to Oil Companies

    Sarah Palin and Rep. James Lankford defended $4 billion in Federal subsidies to the booming oil sector, saying that giving billions in taxpayer dollars to profitable companies wasn’t fiscally irresponsible, since $4 billion is “just a drop in the bucket” when compared to the total deficit. Some drop: it’s 120,000% larger than the NPR funding House Republicans were anxious to eliminate in the name of balancing the budget. Thousands for public media: bad. Billions for oil barons: good.

    http://www.boingboing.net/2011/05/04/sarah-palin-and-jame.html