40 thoughts on “QOTE

  1. Dana

    I would say that 714 would be the absolutely top-mostest number you could ever have!

    Actually, one problem that does (sometimes) exist is that, with eight nearly daily posters, sometimes you get too many new articles in too short a time span. I wind up not reading a lot of them for that reason.

  2. jason330

    Liberalgeek & Nemski are one person. I am also Pandora, Cassandra and Xstyker.

    There are only three us here in Protact’s driveway sponging off his bandwith.

    There. I said it.

    Pass me the Mt Dew please.

  3. Not Brian

    I can not imagine it matters as long as you have some sort of editorial strategy to keep the volume/quality/variety straight – you will do well with more voices…

    Go more liberal and less Democrat with the next choice… you all have drank a little too much of the cool-aid… well, except DV… it’s all the shit he’s smokin..

  4. Not Brian

    OK Jason… was there some shread of truth in the Pornstashe HS girls comment you edited?

    I need to hear the story…

  5. R Smitty

    …was there some shread of truth in the Pornstashe HS girls comment you edited?

    You took it out because of that uncomfortable compliment he gave you in that other post, didn’t you? 😛

  6. Joanne Christian

    You decide. I just keep reading–and thinking. Xstryker really was a keen pick-up though. Hey maybe you guys want to institute a re-apply policy every 6mos. or so, to maintain contributor status? I am talking STATUS people!! I’ve heard Geek throwin’ it around out in public, and those doors opened, audience hushed, and mike set up. Just ask him.

  7. a. price

    so this is an article asking if there are too many articles? And as long as we have one more than de politics

  8. Miscreant

    You already have a sufficient quantity of contributors. Perhaps now is the time to shift your focus to quality.

    heh

  9. Von Cracker

    Maybe Miscreant can be your Bill Kristol….

    Very similar recent track records, huh? 😆

    More the merrier….as long as it provides something of value.

  10. Miscreant

    “Does that make Mis the origin of said *circle*, jerk?”

    Since you asked… I have, on numerous occasions, characterized this blog as a Socialist circle jerk. If that doesn’t strike a chord, I would now characterize you as the newest pivot man in this Socialist daisy chain.

    There’s more where that came from.

Comments are closed.