Author Archives: cassandra_m

About cassandra_m

"You don't make progress by standing on the sidelines, whimpering and complaining. You make progress by implementing ideas." -Shirley Chisholm

President Obama is Angry About the Gun Bill

President Obama spoke some hours back on the failure of the gun bill to pass the Senate. He’s clearly angry and he’s quite right that this is a shameful moment for a Government that is supposed to represent us. If you haven’t seen his remarks, this is the video from TPM (they seem edited, to me):

Please Mr. President — be mad at these idiots and start campaigning against this minority now.

EDIT: TPM points out that Mitch McConnell posted this on his Facebook page after the vote:

Perhaps it is time to link up the #gunfail effort to this.

Wednesday Open Thread [4.17.13]

Still lots of ink being spilled about the Boston Marathon bombing, and at this point, it looks to me like the news organizations are pretty much just regurgitating what they’ve said over the last 2 days. It doesn’t look to me like there is anything new here. But we did have House Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul (R-TX) discussing some details of the FBI investigation. Is he supposed to be talking about this? Hmmm.

This is a week old, but Senator Sheldon Whitehouse is trying to get an investigation into the “False Statements” made by the dark money groups to the IRS— 501(c)4 groups:

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-Rhode Island, said at a campaign finance hearing yesterday that there were “numerous instances” in which nonprofit groups may have made false statements to the IRS about whether they planned to be involved in federal or local elections.

Applications for tax-exempt status are submitted to the IRS under penalty of perjury. If the IRS is not well-suited to investigate these “plain vanilla criminal cases,” the U.S. Department of Justice should, Whitehouse said.

The Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn’t love me enough to see perp walks for these people.

Unusual Hillary Speculation — Could Hillary Clinton Be America’s Thatcher? This is from Margaret Carlson and this piece is something of a mess — largely faulting Hillary for being married to Bill Clinton. Both Hillary and Bill have more than their fair share of issues, but Hillary does have accomplishments, not the least of which is making sure that she was pulling other women up the ladder with her and fighting for women’s issues around the world. Thatcher cared not one whit about other women or the rights or well-being of anyone else, for that matter.

Background checks for more gun transactions looks like it is dead. Note to the Media — hyping the bipartisanship before there was something to show for it is a Big Mistake. And I’m hoping that Democrats add this to the list of stuff that needs to be hung around the GOP’s necks next year.

The Onion takes aim at the New York Post and their coverage of the Boston Marathon Bombing today :

And so, as we attempt to begin the healing process, let us not bicker over such trivial matters as the actual death toll and what exactly happened at yesterday’s bombing. After all, is it really important, in the aftermath of an event so disastrous and sad, to pick apart the so-called information surrounding this horrific situation and find out what actually happened?

To think, these poor victims have not even been buried yet, and some people out there are already quibbling over little details like how many people have died or what the basic facts of this tragedy even are. Can’t they see it’s not the time for that discussion? After all, when something awful like this happens, you’re not thinking about getting the facts right, or adhering to the basic standards of reporting, or providing people with the correct information they desperately need in a time of crisis, or respecting the families of those involved, or treating human life itself as sacred, or acting like professionals, or thinking about anything other than the amount of page views your story will attract on the internet. You’re not thinking about any of that stuff, at least I’m not. To dwell on all that stuff would just be crass.

As they say, go read the whole thing.

What interests you today?

Tuesday Open Thread [4.16.13]

The news is focused on the Boston Marathon bombing, and for so much ink being spilled, there is precious little new information. So 2 bombs, 3 people dead, more than 150 sent to the hospital with injuries. There’s no one in custody yet, law enforcement of all kinds are at the scene and working to ID the bomber and apparently they are getting tons of tips. And right on cue, the right wingnuts are spinning up their conspiracy theories — this one claiming that the bombing is meant to frame the tea party and expand the TSA. Just so you can be certain that there is a national tragedy, the Westboro RatBastards have already pledged to picket funerals from this.

Ezra Klein points out Eight Facts About Terrorism in the United States. This is alot of good data, but this is a great reminder:

The US is the little sliver at the bottom. And for all of us thinking that it is dangerous to be anywhere — always remember that you are at greater risk of being shot than being targeted in a terrorist attack.

The Pulitzer Prizes were announced yesterday and you might want to check out one of the winners: Inside Climate News who seems to be owning the dilbit spill story in Arkansas. This is another year where an online news venue has nailed a Pulitzer for their work.

The price of gold is crashing and Businessweek tells us that global inflation rates are falling, so gold is no longer good as a hedge. But a good deal of the financial news is focused on the price of gold, so Barry Ritholz at The Big Picture has detailed the 12 Rules of Goldbuggery. Here’s a few:

1. Gold is a Currency: This is rule number 1. It is not a decorative or industrial metal, it is a permanent store of value, as dictated by Greeks in Lydia around 700 B.C. And, it shall be ever thus.

2. The price of gold cannot fall, it can only be manipulated lower: When gold’s price falls, it is an unnatural act. It can only occur as the result of an international cabal of Central Bankers and politicians. Its a conspiracy, and we know who the guilty parties are.

3. If the price of gold is rising, it is doing so despite enormous and desperate efforts by manipulators to prevent the rise: This is the corollary to the prior Rule of Gold manipulation. Gold runs up despite the overwhelming opposition to it.

4. The world MUST return to the Gold Standard one day: It is inevitable that we will return to a Gold Standard. We all know this to be true. When we compare the size of the money supply to past amounts when there was a Gold Standard, we can derive prices of Gold in the $7,000, $10,000 even $15,000. Hence, we know its cheap even at $2,000.

Go over to Barry’s place to see the other 8 rules.

Last — and thanks to an anonymous tipster — here is a clip of the radio show where Don Ayotte announces his resignation from the GOP, the conspiracy theory claiming that the GOP framed Bodenwiser for child abuse, the Chair of IPOD adds the cherry on top noting that the number of charges made against Bodenwiser is the same number as a major Sussex route number, nefariousness on the part of GOP to sabotage Ayotte’s campaign(s) and a choice bit wondering about the politics of personal destruction. You reap what you sow, good buddy.

What interests you today?

Tax Day Reading

It’s the obligatory Tax Day thread — but while I’m going to post some items related to paying taxes, I also want to note that today is Jackie Robinson Day, which is a happier thing to consider than Tax Day. I hope that all of you are done with that task. Delaware and Wilmington taxes are due by the 30th, so there is some breathing room.

How do we feel about paying taxes? There’s a slight majority who think that their federal taxes are too high, but I’m intrigued by the downward trend of that number over the past few decades.

NYT columnist proposes that if corporations are people, then maybe they should be taxed like people.

The fiscal problem we face is not, then, a lack of revenue sources. We can finance any amount of transfer payments and “entitlements” by taxing corporations’ profits in the same way we tax personal income, using a progressive formula. If necessary, give them a mortgage deduction — they already get something like it in the form of accelerated depreciation allowances on their purchases of capital equipment — but make them pay higher taxes on their income. Do that, and the federal deficit goes away.

The now-familiar objection to a tax increase on corporate profits is that it will discourage private investment and thus dampen job creation. The retort is just as obvious: since when have tax cuts on corporate profits led to increased investment, faster job creation and higher per capita consumption out of rising real wages? It didn’t happen after the Reagan Revolution, it didn’t happen during the Clinton boom of the 1990s, and it sure didn’t happen under George W. Bush.

There’s an idea out there called “return-free filing”. It would have the IRS send you a pre-completed tax form for taxpayers who routinely file the simple forms, you would review, make your adjustments and send it in to the IRS. You can accept the return as prepared, you can make changes to it or you can just do your own return for filing. ProPublica and NPR have been reporting on how Intuit has spent more than $11M in trying to kill this idea. For filers with simple returns this is easy and costs are reduced all the way around for this kind of return. And if you hate the government’s return for you, you can always do it yourself. But it would clearly lift the burden on filers with simple returns. Intuit, of course, wants people to spend more money on their software, so they have been opposing this idea. Intuit has also been working on making sure that the IRS does not offer its own electronic filing service.

An interesting discussion for the case of getting rid of tax deductions.

The charitable-giving deduction also favors the causes of the stingy rich over the generous poor. Households with incomes between $20,000 and 40,000 give 5 percent of their income to charity, but most get no tax deduction (and very few indeed will get their name on a building or invitations to a black-tie dinner as a result). Households with incomes of $75,000 and above are far more likely to get a tax break. Yet they give away only about 2 percent to 3 percent of their income. The rich also give differently. According to the Congressional Budget Office, households on less than $100,000 a year give 10 percent of their funds to charities designed to provide basic needs and 1 percent to the arts. Households with incomes of more than $1 million give 4 percent to basic-needs charities and 10 percent to the arts.

This idea of eliminating the charitable giving tax break, the mortgage interest tax break and the local taxes tax break have been around for awhile, but they are getting more and more traction each year with the pundit class. The problem with eliminating these tax breaks is that you remove key supports to the real middle class. It doesn’t make much sense to me to further destabilize the middle class, because these tax breaks don’t incentivize the wanted behavior for people who have lots more disposable income.

A great report by the U.S. PIRG — noting “that the average taxpayer would have the burden of an additional $1,026 in taxes to make up for the lost revenues due to the use of offshore tax havens by corporations and wealthy individuals. The report also found that the average small business would have to pay $3,067 to cover the cost of offshore tax dodging by large corporations.”

And while you might not be paying the additional thousand dollars now, you can expect to if businesses and wealthy people can continue to avoid paying their taxes.

Hope your taxes were easy this year!

Late Night Video — Jon Stewart Tackles Guess Who’s Coming to Howard

As usual, he nails it. Especially the collective ignoring of the last 50 years of GOP history. Especially choise that he found articles from the 70s when the GOP explicitly wrote off the Black vote, wanting the VRA to stay alive, because that would drive more southern whites to the GOP.

The Whitesplaining Rand Paul

So Rand Paul went to Howard University yesterday to speak to the student body in what was billed as an outreach to minority and young voters. The GOP has gotten alot of press since November making it very plain that the structural problem with their party is its lack of appeal to minority and young voters. Rand Paul apparently sees himself as helping to fix this problem — first by actually going to the audience the GOP needs to start engaging, and then relying on the media to brand this as a libertarian outreach. The latter is important because it makes Paul look like a leader in a rebranding effort — making the GOP more libertarian — while still pursuing the same GOP goals on behalf of corporations and rich people. And trying to call those goals “freedom” and “opportunity”. If you haven’t seen the speech, I’ve embedded the video (approx. 50 minutes) at the end of this post. RealClearPolitics has the text of his remarks.

I’m going to start with the “freedom” thing. No self-respecting libertarian would be in the business of trying to give a fertilized egg the status of a born person. Especially as a political gambit to stop abortion and the right of grown up women to manage their lives. Leaving women to manage their reproductive choices, their health choices and their family’s well-being looks more like freedom than trying to invoke government intervention into the lives of women and their families. And libertarians who promote Big Government for women’s uterus’ are the embarrassed Republicans that we make fun of routinely. There is no freedom, no opportunity for women in invoking the machinery of government to interfere with your reproductive and health choices.

But Paul pretty much used this speech to do what the GOP does when it tries to reach out to African Americans — they invoke the history of Abraham Lincoln and ignore the more recent history of giving the racist Dixiecrats a permanent home and the routine use of the Southern Strategy to ensure votes from Southern (and some poor) white people. Failing to deal with the whole of their history always indicates to me that the GOP still isn’t ready to expand their coalition. It is in that giant blank space in the GOP’s history with race that African Americans turned to the Democrats. It is in looking at what happened there — not appealing to Abraham Lincoln — that would inform how the GOP needs to proceed to appeal to African Americans. And the first person who will recognize that and be willing to discuss ways to eliminate the utter dependence the GOP has on the Southern Strategy (and its variants) is going to be the first Republican who can be taken seriously in any outreach efforts.

Paul couldn’t even come to this meeting without condescending and disrespecting this audience. Why would you think that the college student audience at Howard University would not know the history of the NAACP? Why would you think that this audience of young African Americans wouldn’t be able to decide for themselves whether Voter ID was discrimination? I’d bet alot of money that every single person in that audience would know alot more about discrimination than Rand Paul ever will. Why would he lie about his opposition to the Civil Rights Act? Why would he invoke his own version of Mitt Romney’s 47% bull?

This last one is pretty important. Slavery and Jim Crow pretty badly distorted the economic “free market” for African Americans. Democratic policies started to help ease some (but no where near all) of those distortions. But the thing that Paul’s claim that Democrats give African Americans stuff ignores is that in the years since economic policy tried to right the ship for African Americans, there has been a mass migration directly to the working and middle class — the products of which were Paul’s audience. Outside of Pell grants and student loans, these kids aren’t getting any more from the government than their white counterparts are. Which makes Paul guilty of dogwhistling with the wrong people. There are still too many poor African Americans and too many for whom poverty is generational. There are alot of poor and generationally poor white people too, except they don’t get the press that the black and brown ones do. But the common problem for all of them is that they are poor — and there isn’t one damn thing about the GOP policy that will help them. There isn’t one damn thing about GOP policy that is going to invest in freedom and opportunity for these people. Because GOP policy is about sending as much tax money to their Corporate sponsors as possible. And we already know that America’s corporations are interested in the poor as a marketing cohort — extracting what resources they have, not investing in them (the opportunity part of the equation).

Charles Blow has a great piece today discussing precisely how the GOP lost the African American vote.

Republicans lost it when Richard Nixon’s strategist Kevin Phillips, who popularized the “Southern Strategy,” told The New York Times Magazine in 1970 that “the more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans.”

He’s got alot more. But the bottom line is that as long as the GOP thinks that African Americans have simply no clue about their own history, their own history with the Republican Party and can’t be trusted to assess who can best represent their political interests, they still aren’t ready for an honest conversation. No matter how hard they try, the usual Republican Bamboozlement does not equal freedom and liberty.

Wednesday Open Thread [4.10.13]

It is a very fine Wednesday, and I hope that some of you are out playing in this glorious weather. PLAYING — not shooting pigeons that are being thrown in the way of your gun. The more I think about it, I think that shooting skeet is probably tougher than that, and if you are shooting for fun, work on your skills, people.

It looks like there may be a compromise on the background checks for guns issue in Congress:

Toomey and Manchin were discussing an expansion of current law to require background checks for gun sales over the Internet and between private parties at gun shows, according to the aide, who asked not to be identified in describing the discussions. Noncommercial person-to-person firearms sales wouldn’t be covered, the aide said.

Democrats wanted to require background checks for almost all gun sales, though some supporters said the approach by Toomey and Manchin would be a good compromise.

This covers the larger vectors where criminals can acquire guns. Democrats seem to think that they can get a vote in the Senate, but I think that is still unclear.

More #gunfail news:

A 6-year-old Toms River, N.J., boy who was shot in the head Monday by his 4-year-old neighbor, died Tuesday night, Ocean County authorities said tonight.

I’m sure that the gun’s owner is just another good guy with a gun.

So this is a thing — opting out of the high-stakes standardized tests that are destabilizing teaching and politics. I knew that there were parents working at ending it in some places, but did not know that opting out was it’s own movement. This is from Philly:

Anglin is one of the first, small batch of Philadelphia parents to join a national “opt-out” movement – a grass-roots rebellion against the outsized role that standardized tests like the PSSA (Pennsylvania System of School Assessment) play in the day-to-day classroom experience, in the closure of urban schools rated as “failing,” and in stressing out both students and their teachers, whose careers may soon ride on the results.

I endorse this. Seriously.

What interests you today?

QOTD — A Modest Proposal on Legislator Pay

Over the past week or so there has been a fair amount of press on the salary givebacks planned by President Obama, SecDef Hagel and other Cabinet Members — salary givebacks meant to show some shared sacrifice with Federal workers getting ready to live with enforced furloughs. There’s been a yawning silence from members of Congress on sharing that sacrifice, and you’d think that the conservative ones (especially!) would be rushing to the paymaster’s office to do their bit to help put a stop to out of control spending, right? There also seems to be a minor industry in the press monitoring whether or not Joe Biden will give back any of his pay — apparently he will if his staff is hit with sequester cuts. AG Holder will give back part of his salary if his staff is hit with the sequester cuts. For most of these folks, the salary givebacks aren’t much of a financial sacrifice, so there is a good bit of show in these gestures. But in contrast to Congress — who have bought the out of control spending bullshit lock stock and Pete Peterson barrel — the Executive does look like they are taking this situation abit more seriously. So what about it Senators Carper and Coons, Rep, Carney? You guys voted for every bit of this burden on federal workers, departments and services — time for your shared sacrifice too.

Anyway, for the QOTD — I saw this proposal on Facebook the other night and — frankly — this makes sense to me. If we are focused like a laser beam on compensating *teachers* for effectiveness (and for effectiveness over factors they can’t always control), why not compensate legislators the same way? What do you think?

Hillary Makes a Speech On the Unfinished Business of the 21st Century

It’s Hillary Clinton Day here at DL! Last Friday, Hillary Clinton took the stage at the Women in the World Summit in New York to make the case for women’s rights. Global women’s rights. (Am I the only one who really would have liked to have gone to this event?) Calling women’s rights the unfinished business of the century, she reminds us of how much women contribute to their places and how much even first world places like the US still have to go to achieve real equality.

The Daily Beast was apparently a sponsor of this event, and there is plenty of coverage there. This speech (and another upcoming this Tuesday, I believe) are why there is such a big slug of Hillary news and speculation over the last few days. She didn’t really touch on her future plans, except to say,“I look forward to being your partner in all the days and years ahead.” You can see the entire speech (approx 33 minutes, including Tina Brown intro) below. And the entire text of the speech is replicated below that.

Thank you so much. Oh, what a wonderful occasion for me to be back here, the fourth Women in the World conference I’ve been privileged to attend, introduced by the founder, creator, and my friend, Tina Brown. When one thinks about this annual conference it really is intended to, and I believe has, focused attention on the global challenges facing women from equal rights and education, to human slavery, literacy, the power of the media and technology to affect change in women’s futures and so much else. And for that I thank Tina and the great team that she has worked with in order to produce this conference and the effects it has created. It’s been such an honor to work with all of you over the years though it’s hard to see from up here out into the audience, I did see some faces and I know that this is an occasion as well as for so many friends and colleagues to come together and take stock for where we stand and what more needs to be done in advancing the great unfinished business of the 21st century—advancing rights and opportunities for women and girls.

Now this is unfinished around the world, where too many women are still treated at best as second-class citizens, at worst as some kind of subhuman species. Those of you who were there last night saw that remarkable film that interviewed men primarily in Pakistan, talking very honestly about their intention to continue to control the women in their lives and their reach. But the business is still unfinished here at home in the United States, we have come so far together but there’s still work to be done.

Now, I have always believed that women are not victims, we are agents of change, we are drivers of progress, we are makers of peace—all we need is a fighting chance.

And that firm faith in the untapped potential of women at home and around the world has been at the heart of my work my entire life, from college and law school, from Arkansas to the White House to the Senate. And when I became Secretary of State, I was determined to weave this perspective even deeper into the fabric of American foreign policy.

But I knew to do that, I couldn’t just preach to the usual choir. We had to reach out, not only to men, in solidarity and recruitment, but to religious communities, to every partner we could find. We had to make the case to the whole world that creating opportunities for women and girls advances security and prosperity for everyone. So we relied on the empirical research that shows that when women participate in the economy, everyone benefits. When women participate in peace-making and peace-keeping, we are all safer and more secure. And when women participate in politics of their nations they can make a difference.

But as strong a case as we’ve made, too many otherwise thoughtful people continue to see the fortunes of women and girls as somehow separate from society at large. They nod, they smile and then they relegate these issues once again to the sidelines. I have seen it over and over again, I have been kidded about it I have been ribbed, I have been challenged in boardrooms and official offices across the world.

But fighting to give women and girls a fighting chance isn’t a nice thing to-do. It isn’t some luxury that we get to when we have time on our hands to spend. This is a core imperative for every human being in every society. If we do not continue the campaign for women’s rights and opportunities, the world we want to live, the country we all love and cherish, will not be what it should be.

It is no coincidence that so many of the countries that threaten regional and global peace are the very places where women and girls are deprived of dignity and opportunity. Think of the young women from northern Mali to Afghanistan whose schools have been destroyed. Or of the girls across Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia who have been condemned to child marriage. Or of the refugees of the conflicts from eastern Congo to Syria who endure rape and deprivation as a weapon of war.

It is no coincidence that so many of the countries where the rule of law and democracy are struggling to take root are the same places where women and girls cannot participate as full and equal citizens. Like in Egypt, where women stood on the front lines of the revolution but are now being denied their seats at the table and face a rising tide of sexual violence.
It is no coincidence that so many of the countries making the leap from poverty to prosperity are places now grappling with how to empower women. I think it is one of the unanswered questions of the rest of this century to whether countries, like China and India, can sustain their growth and emerge as true global economic powers. Much of that depends on what happens to women and girls.

None of these are coincidences. Instead, they demonstrate—and your presence here confirms—that we are meeting at a remarkable moment of confluence.

Because in countries and communities across the globe where for generations violence against women has gone unchecked, opportunity and dignity virtually unknown, there is a powerful new current of grassroots activism stirring, galvanized by events too outrageous to ignore and enabled by new technologies that give women and girls voices like never before. That’s why we need to seize this moment. But we need to be thoughtful and smart and savvy about what this moment really offers to us.

Now many of us have been working and advocating and fighting for women and girls for more decades than we care to remember. And I think we can be and should proud of all that we’ve achieved. Conferences like this one have been part of that progress. But let’s recognize much of our advocacy is still rooted in a 20th century, top-down frame. The world is changing beneath our feet and it is past time to embrace a 21st century approach to advancing the rights and opportunities of women and girls at home and across the globe.

Think about it. You know, technology, from satellite television to cell phones from Twitter to Tumblr, is helping bring abuses out of the shadows and into the center of global consciousness, Think of that woman in a blue bra beaten in Tahrir Square, think about that 6-year old girl in Afghanistan about to be sold into marriage to settle a family debt.
Just as importantly, technological changes are helping inspire, organize, and empower grassroots action. I have seen this and that is where progress is coming from and that’s where our support is needed. We have a tremendous stake in the outcome of these metrics.

Today, more than ever, we see clearly that the fate of women and girls around the world is tied up with the greatest security and economic challenges of our time.

Consider Pakistan, a proud country with a rich history that recently marked a milestone in its democratic development when a civilian government completed its full term for the very first time. And it is no secret that Pakistan is plagued by many ills: violent extremism, sectarian conflict, poverty, energy shortages, corruption, weak democratic institutions. It is a combustible mix. And more than 30,000 Pakistanis have been killed by terrorists in the last decade.

The repression of women in Pakistan exacerbates all of these problems.

More than 5 million children do not attend school—and two-thirds of them are girls. The Taliban insurgency has made the situation even worse.

As Malala has said and reminded us: “We live in the 21st century. How can we be deprived from education?” She went on to say, “I have the right to play. I have the right to sing. I have the right to talk. I have the right to go to market. I have the right to speak up.”

How many of us here today would have that kind of courage? The Taliban recognized this young girl, 14-year at the time, as a serious threat. You know what? They were right— she was a threat. Extremism thrives amid ignorance and anger, intimidation and cowardice. As Malala said, “If this new generation is not given pens, they will be given guns.”
But the Taliban miscalculated. They thought if they silenced Malala, and thank god they didn’t, that not only she, but her cause would die. Instead, they inspired millions of Pakistanis to finally say, “Enough is enough.” You heard it directly from those two brave young Pakistani women yesterday. And they are not alone. People marched in the streets and signed petitions demanding that every Pakistani child—girls as well as boys—have the opportunity to attend school. And that in itself was a rebuke to the extremists and their ideology.

I’m well aware that improving life for Pakistan’s women is not a panacea. But it’s impossible to imagine making real progress on the country’s other problems—especially violent extremism—without tapping the talents and addressing the needs of Pakistan’s women, including reducing corruption, ending the culture of impunity, expanding access to education, to credit, to all the tools that give a woman or a man make the most of their life’s dreams. None of this will be easy or quick. But the grassroots response to Malala’s shooting gives us hope for the future.

Again and again we have seen women drive peace and progress. In Northern Ireland, Catholic and Protestant women like Inez McCormick came together to demand an end to the Troubles and helped usher in the Good Friday Accords. In Liberia, women marched and protested until the country’s warlords agreed to end their civil war, they prayed the devil back to hell, and they twice elected Ellen Johnson Sirleaf as the first woman president in Africa. An organization called Sisters Against Violent Extremism now connects women in more than a dozen countries who have risked their lives to tell terrorists that they are not welcome in their communities.

So the next time you hear someone say that the fate of women and girls is not a core national security issue, it’s not one of those hard issues that really smart people deal with, remind them: The extremists understand the stakes of this struggle. They know that when women are liberated, so are entire societies. We must understand this too. And not only understand it, but act on it.

And the struggles do not end. Struggles do not end when countries attempt the transition to democracy. we’ve seen that very clearly the last few years.

Many millions including many of us were inspired and encouraged by the way women and men worked together during the revolutions in places like Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya. But we know that all over the world when the dust settles, too often women’s gains are lot to better organized, more powerful forces of oppression.

We see seeing women largely shut out of decision-making. We see women activists believe they are being targeted by organized campaigns of violence and intimidation.

But still, many brave activists, women and men alike, continue to advocate for equality and dignity for all Egyptians, Tunisians, and Libyans. They know the only way to realize the promise of the Arab Spring is with and through the full participation of half the population.

Now what is true in politics is also true economics.

In the years ahead, a number of rapidly developing nations are poised to reshape the global economy, lift many millions out of poverty and into the middle class. This will be good for them and good for us—it will create vast new markets and trading partners.

But no country can achieve its full economic potential when women are left out or left behind… a fact underscored day after day and most recently to me a tragedy in India.

Concerning the young 23-year-old woman, brutally beaten and raped on a Delhi bus last December she was from a poor farming family, but like so many women and men she wanted to climb that economic ladder. She had aspirations for her life. She studied all day to become a physical therapist, then went to work at call centers in the evening, she sleep two hours a night. President Mukherjeeof described her as a “symbol of all that New India strives to be.”

But if her life embodied the aspirations of a rising nation, her death and her murder, pointed to the many challenges still holding it back. The culture of rape is tied up with a broader set of problems: official corruption, illiteracy, inadequate education, laws and traditions, customs, culture, that prevent women from being seen as equal human beings. And in addition, in many places, India and China being the leaders, in skewed gender balance with many more men than women, which contributes to human trafficking, child marriage, and other abuses that dehumanize women and corrode society.
So millions of Indians took to the streets in 2011, they protested corruption. In 2012, came the Delhi gang rape, and the two causes merged. Demands for stronger measures against rape were joined by calls for better policing and more responsive governance, for an India that could protect all its citizens and deliver the opportunities they deserve. Some have called that the “Indian Spring.”

Because, as the protesters understood, India will rise or fall with its women. Its had a tradition of strong women leaders, but those women leaders like women leaders around the world like those who become presidents or prime ministers or foreign ministers or heads of corporations cannot be seen as tokens that give everyone else in society the chance to say we’ve taken care of our women. So any country that wants to rise economically and improve productivity needs to open the doors.

Latin America and the Caribbean have steadily increased women’s participation in the labor market since the 1990s, they now account for more than half of all workers. The World Bank estimates that extreme poverty in the region has decreased by 30 percent as a result.

Here in the United States, American women went from holding 37 percent of all jobs forty years ago to nearly 48 percent today. And the productivity gains attributable to this increase account for more than $3.5 trillion in GDP growth over those four decades. Similarly, fast-growing Asian economies could boost their per capita incomes by as much as 14 percent by 2020 if they brought more women into the workforce.

Laws and traditions that hold back women, hold back entire societies, creating more opportunities for women and girls will grow economies and spread prosperity. When I first began talking about this using rape data from the World Bank and private sector analyses there were doubters who couldn’t quite put the pieces together. But that debate is over. Opening the doors to one’s economy for woman will make a difference.

Now, I want to conclude where I began, with the unfinished business we face here at home. The challenges and opportunities I’ve outlined today are not just for the people of the developing world. America must face this too if we want to continue leading the world.

Traveling the globe these last four years reaffirmed and deepened my pride in our country and the ideals we represent. But it also challenged me to think about who we are and the values we are supposed to be living here at home in order to represent abroad After all, our global leadership for peace and prosperity, for freedom and equality, is not a birthright. It must be earned by every generation.

And yes, we now have American women at high levels of business, academia, and government—you name it. But, as we’ve seen in recent months, we’re still asking age-old questions about how to make women’s way in male-dominated fields, how to balance the demands of work and family. The Economist magazine recently published what it called a “glass-ceiling index” ranking countries based on factors like opportunities for women in the workplace and equal pay. The United States was not even in the top 10. Worse, recent studies have found that, on average, women live shorter lives in America than in any other major industrialized country.

Think about it for a minute. We are the richest and most powerful country in the world. Yet many American women today are living shorter lives than their mothers, especially those with the least education. That is a historic reversal that rivals the decline in life expectancy for Russian men after the disintegration of the Soviet Union.
Now there is no single explanation for why this is happening. Prescription drug overdoses have spiked: obesity, smoking, lack of health insurance, intractable poverty. But the fact is that for too many American women, opportunity and the dream of upward mobility—the American Dream— remains elusive.

That’s not the way it’s supposed to be. I think of the extraordinary sacrifices my mother made to survive her own difficult childhood, to give me not only life, but opportunity along with love and inspiration. And I’m very proud of my own daughter and I look at all these young women I’m privileged to work with or know through Chelsea and it’s hard to imagine turning the clock back on them. But in places throughout America large and small the clock is turning back.
So, we have work to do. Renewing America’s vitality at home and strengthening our leadership abroad will take the energy and talents of all our people, women and men.

If America is going to lead, we need to learn from the women of the world who have blazed new paths and developed new solutions, on everything from economic development to education to environmental protection.
If America is going to lead, we need to catch up with so much of the rest of the world and finally ratify the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Discrimination Against Women.

If America is going to lead, we need to stand by the women of Afghanistan after our combat troops come home, we need to speak up for all the women working to realize the promise of the Arab Spring, and do more to save the lives of the hundreds of thousands of mothers who die every year during childbirth from preventable causes and so much more.
If America is going to lead, we need to stand by the women of Afghanistan after our combat troops come home, we need to speak up for all the women working to realize the promise of the Arab Spring, and do more to save the lives of the hundreds of thousands of mothers who die every year during childbirth from preventable causes and so much more.
But that’s not all.

Because if America is going to lead we expect ourselves to lead, we need to empower women here at home to participate fully in our economy and our society, we need to make equal pay a reality, we need to extending family and medical leave benefits to more workers and make them paid, we need to encourage more women and girls to pursue careers in math and science.

We need to invest in our people so they can live up to their own God-given potential.

That’s how America will lead in the world.

So let’s learn from the wisdom of every mother and father all over the world who teaches their daughters that there is no limit on how big she can dream and how much she can achieve.

This truly is the unfinished business of the 21st century. And It is the work we are all called to do. I look forward to being your partner in all the days and years ahead. Lets keep fighting for opportunity and dignity, let’s keep fighting for freedom and equality, let’s keep fighting for full participation. And let’s keep telling the world over and over again that yes, women’s rights are human rights and human rights are women’s rights once and for all.

Conspiracy Theory Poll Report

PPP did their weekly national poll this week on Conspiracy Theories. This is sometimes cringe-worthy, but pretty hysterical. Take a look at the state of mind of Americans:

– 37% of voters believe global warming is a hoax, 51% do not. Republicans say global warming is a hoax by a 58-25 margin, Democrats disagree 11-77, and Independents are more split at 41-51. 61% of Romney voters believe global warming is a hoax

– 6% of voters believe Osama bin Laden is still alive

– 21% of voters say a UFO crashed in Roswell, NM in 1947 and the US government covered it up. More Romney voters (27%) than Obama voters (16%) believe in a UFO coverup

– 28% of voters believe secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government, or New World Order. A plurality of Romney voters (38%) believe in the New World Order compared to 35% who don’t

– 28% of voters believe Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attacks. 36% of Romney voters believe Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11, 41% do not

– 20% of voters believe there is a link between childhood vaccines and autism, 51% do not

– 7% of voters think the moon landing was faked

– 13% of voters think Barack Obama is the anti-Christ, including 22% of Romney voters

– Voters are split 44%-45% on whether Bush intentionally misled about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. 72% of Democrats think Bush lied about WMDs, Independents agree 48-45, just 13% of Republicans think so

– 29% of voters believe aliens exist

– 14% of voters say the CIA was instrumental in creating the crack cocaine epidemic in America’s inner cities in the 1980’s

– 9% of voters think the government adds fluoride to our water supply for sinister reasons (not just dental health)

– 4% of voters say they believe “lizard people” control our societies by gaining political power

– 51% of voters say a larger conspiracy was at work in the JFK assassination, just 25% say Oswald acted alone

– 14% of voters believe in Bigfoot

– 15% of voters say the government or the media adds mind-controlling technology to TV broadcast signals (the so-called Tinfoil Hat crowd)

– 5% believe exhaust seen in the sky behind airplanes is actually chemicals sprayed by the government for sinister reasons

– 15% of voters think the medical industry and the pharmaceutical industry “invent” new diseases to make money

– Just 5% of voters believe that Paul McCartney actually died in 1966

– 11% of voters believe the US government allowed 9/11 to happen, 78% do not agree

The “lizard people” one may be my favorite, and then I saw this report from Danger Room at Wired. It reports on a new claim that shape-shifting alien reptiles are guarding Barack Obama. The White House says that it can’t afford shape-shifting secret service agents. But what *are* they doing with the money they aren’t spending on White House tours, I ask you? But just take a look at the video and you tell *me* if there aren’t shape=shifting lizard people on the Secret Service payroll:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=kR13y76Itks[/youtube]

Developers Running the Show in NCCo

Sunday’s NJ featured a fantastic piece of reporting by Adam Taylor and Maureen Milford. Called Influence, Access Taint Land-Use Decisions, this is a remarkably detailed look at how the NCCo land use planning process — from both the county and the DelDOT side was apparently captured by the developers, their lawyers and their lobbyists. Not only that, but Pam Scott’s showy leaving of Saul Ewing was just for show. So not only is the land planning process broken, but so is the Ethics Policy in the county.

This was choice:

Scott said she doesn’t believe that she and Roy received greater access or favorable treatment.

“People know who the players are. Delaware’s a small state,” Scott said. “My colleagues in the land-use business know who to talk to. I don’t think the access we had was any different than any of the other people.”

Indeed they do. And I expect the gleeful outrage expressed by other land-use attorneys in this article indicates that, as well as a number of players getting their licks in. And again, Pam Scott was doing her job, one I expect she was paid for pretty well. The people who failed here were the NCCo and the DelDOT people who let Ms. Scott and Roger Roy just hijack the entire process. Any regulator who is waiting to make decisions pending input from attorneys and lobbyists very likely should be out of a job. Period. One of the biggest quality of life issues anywhere is the difficulty of getting from place to place. Traffic studies AND accompanying mitigation to not deteriorate the current traffic situation in any targeted area is supposed to be one of the jobs of government. Just building everyplace while not upgrading the traffic infrastructure is a planning failure. If you’ve been to Christiana Mall (before the construction), you get what bad planning looks like. I’ve often thought that the cure to bad planning decisions (or just ignoring it) is requiring master planners to be licensed in the way that engineers are. Professional licencing comes with responsibilities AND liabilities for not doing the right thing. Certainly runaway suburban building with no improvements to traffic infrastructure would slow way down.

Governments taking their cue from corporate interests at the expense of the rest of us isn’t new. But it does deteriorate the quality of life for the rest of us. I’m very glad that there is finally light on the shenanigans of Scott and Clark as well as the NCCo planning process and DelDOT’s failures. Both NCCo and DelDOT need to revisit how they do business so that they aren’t a wholly owned subsidiary of Delaware’s developers.

What do you think needs to change?

Easter Open Thread [3.31.13]

Happy Easter, everyone! Have you gotten to the part of the day where you and yours are creating new tortures for those horrifying Peeps?

Pope Francis’ Easter message called for peace in the world:

As popes before him have, he urged Israelis and Palestinians to resume peace talks and end a conflict that “has lasted all too long.” And, in reflecting on the two-year-old Syrian crisis, Francis asked, “How much suffering must there still be before a political solution” can be found?

The pope also expressed desire for a “spirit of reconciliation” on the Korean peninsula, where North Korea says it has entered “a state of war” with South Korea. He also decried warfare and terrorism in Africa, as well as what he called the 21st century’s most extensive form of slavery: human trafficking.

Francis, the first pope from Latin America and a member of the Jesuit order, lamented that the world is “still divided by greed looking for easy gain.” He wished for an end to violence linked to drug trafficking and the dangers stemming from the reckless exploitation of natural resources.

More adventures in GOP idiocy that includes an expansion of AZ government that seems to want to now check your ID (or look in your underpants) before you use a restroom:

Arizona is at it again. Just one month after the Phoenix City Council voted to amend an anti-discrimination law to include lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals, Arizona lawmakers have just passed a bill that overrides some of those protections. Arizona Senate Bill SB 1045, authored by Rep. John Kavanagh (R-AZ), originally sought to make it a Class 1 Misdemeanor for transgender individuals to use a bathroom other than one that aligns with the gender on their birth certificate.

Look who the Virginia Voter ID disenfranchises:

[Augustine] Carter is 85. She was born at home in Baltimore, and she never had a birth certificate. After Carter moved to the commonwealth in the 1950s, she eventually got a state ID card – she’d never learned how to drive because “the highways petrified me.”

When that card expired in 2006, the state wouldn’t renew it. The 9/11 attacks brought stricter regulations.

Carter, who spoke to me by phone from her Richmond home, told me she had to contact a genealogist, research the 1940 census and request help from the federal government. The six-year effort finally ended in 2012, when her new documents passed state muster.

There is something genuinely screwed up about a culture that would make it way easier to buy a gun than it is to vote. but I think that if I was in that situation, I might just buy a gun and point it at election officials to let me vote. Sounds like it would align with the gun nuts desire to be able to counter government tyrrany. (h/t From Pine View Farm)

What interests you today?