National

Donald Trump today made his most deranged statement yet since assuming his office, claiming that, had he been there, he would have confronted the Parkland school shooter even without a…

The Chesdel was just okay. Sometimes it wasn't even that good.

1) Trumps states that he would have run into Parkland HS to save students. 2) Next week the story is revised after Trump convinces himself that he did run in and stop the shooting. 3) Later that same week, Trump-bots attack random people who question Trump's version of events. 4) The media covers both sides of the "debate". 5) The following Monday morning Chris Coons appears on Morning Joe and states, "People of good will on both sides of the question have to agree to disagree on the total number of students Trump saved that sad day."

It is self evident that Tom Carper's loyalty is not to the people of Delaware who have constantly returned him to office while hoping for the best. His votes, his public statements, the things he shows concern over set him apart from the concerns of the people he "represents" in the US Senate. But can he be defeated? I have always answered "no" that question. But now that I take a good look at Carper and his club of insiders, now that I see Professional Dems being exposed for what they are all over the country, I'm putting my cynicism on the shelf.

I'm not great on this stuff. This is more of an El Som type post, so I'll just leave it here and step back. But it seems to me that…

American corporations are fleeing the NRA faster than bullets from a semi-automatic rifle, and the NRA's response sums up perfectly why people own guns: The organization, which claims 5 million…

In the past 48 hours, four of the Democrats in Delaware's General Assembly have donated the campaign donations they received from the NRA Political Victory Fund and/or the Delaware Foundation…

The White House, under pressure about Jared Kushner's inability to get security clearance as well as facing questions about Trump's half-assed ideas about school security, tried to change the subject…

The original headline over the story read "Taking one cent, ever, from the NRA should disqualify you from ever running for office as a Democrat" I'm not that hard line. I'm willing to cut some slack on past NRA contributions (provided they are publicly disavowed), but have zero tolerance for any going forward. Times have changed. The NRA was once a sportsman's association. It isn't now, and it hasn't been that for a long time.

There is no excuse for these Democrats. Receiving campaign funds from the radical NRA means that they are, soft on gun crime, and on the side of mass murder.

Be prepared: The Guns for Teachers proposal is polling close enough to 50-50 to make it the top choice for Republicans who don't want to talk about banning military-style assault…