National

Trump begins quest for Sorcerer's Stone in order to resurrect Joe Paterno pic.twitter.com/kSXw6wMVH6

— Ian McKenna (@Ian_McK_) April 13, 2016

How's Joe Paterno? He's dead. Before that, he was disgraced for allowing and ignoring child sexual abuse. "We're going to bring that back." Bring what back? The dead? You are going to reanimate Joe Paterno to commence the Zombie Apocalypse? Or do you mean the child sexual abuse? Are you a fan of that Donald?

There is a lot to like about this mail piece. My observations below. And BTW, has anyone else been polled twice in the past 3 days by either Bernie or Hillary?

Props to Butler and Eisley for putting their butts on the line for a vision of American politics less corrupted by big money. AND for getting NJ coverage of the protest. No small feat for a group not aligned with the Delaware Chamber of Commerce.

Another sprawling retail monstrosity situated at the entrance to Lewes and Rehoboth was (shockingly) voted down by the sprawl happy Sussex County Council.

Former officials of American Legion Post 28 have been charged for taking part in a check-cashing scheme that stole $641,000 in slot-machine proceeds, officials say. The vice commander of the American Legion Post 28, a former post commander, two former finance officers and a past adjutant face charges after police say they wrote checks for cash that was not used for American Legion business. A sixth man involved has since died.

What gets me about these guys, and the other old farts I see stealing lumber from construction sites, is that they are the first to blame everything on the no-good poors. Meanwhile, they act like their stealing isn't a crime because society owes them something.

I have seen Sanders supporters here and there lately, including State Representative John Kowalko, saying the super delegate system is not fair. This newest round of complaining about the super delegates did not make sense to me, since as of right now, Hillary Clinton is leading Bernie Sanders by over 250 pledged delegates and 2.5 million popular votes. So Super delegates are not even figuring into this equation and are not relevant. It's not like they are stealing the nomination away from Bernie Sanders. Indeed, only one campaign has made the argument that Super delegates should hand the nomination to someone who is not the pledged delegate leader, and that campaign is Bernie Sanders'. Talk about being undemocratic and hypocritical. So why complain about the super delegates now? It didn't make sense. Especially when you consider, no matter how undemocratic and hypocritical it is, winning over the super delegates really is the only way Bernie Sanders can win the Democratic nomination in 2016. Then I came upon this MSNBC graphic being passed around by some Sanders supporters on Twitter: The graphic is misleading, but at first glance (and after several glances if you low-information independent voter unfamiliar with delegates, super delegates and proportional representation, which happen to be a lot a Bernie supporters), it seems unfair. How does Bernie win 56% of the vote and not win the most delegates??? Come inside for the explanation.