Who “won” the debate? That’s easy… Republicans won

Who “won” the debate? That’s easy… Republicans won

2 Comments
Roger Ailes, Fox News and the RNC won. Crazy-ass modern Republican economics (which have failed, and failed, and failed) won. The notion that we should bomb Iran rather than talk to Iran won big time. If you think the country would be better off with school vouchers and without Planned Parenthood - you won! Congrats. This was not a debate, but a disgusting travesty. That our political process had devolved to this makes me sick. That those nine nit wits (and Ben Carson) got to stand up on a national stage and be taken seriously as candidates for high office is an absolute indictment of this country and its people. William Henry Harrison read the military history of ancient Rome and Julius Caesar in Latin. Teddy Roosevelt spoke French, German, Greek and could read Latin. The collective brain power of the men on the stage last night couldn't power a night light. A lot will be written about who scored what points, but the bottom line is - Idiocy won. America lost.
Debate Prediction Thread

Debate Prediction Thread

6 Comments
Huckabee manifests the stigmata of Christ. (May or may not also speak in tongues.) Trump lights a cigar with a $1,000 bill. Jeb shocks everyone by speaking clearly and eloquently…
Thursday Open Thread [8.6.15] — All Debate Edition

Thursday Open Thread [8.6.15] — All Debate Edition

3 Comments
New York Times: “The most pressing question that Donald Trump could face [tonight] in the first debate of the 2016 presidential race may not be about Iran or immigration, but this: Can he deploy enough adjectives (‘huge!’), superlatives (‘the worst!’) and invectives (‘loser!’) for him to use up his time without being challenged successfully on the substance of policy?”
“Mr. Trump could come away a winner if he makes cogent points without sounding too hostile, presenting himself as more of a serious-minded, anti-establishment voice in a primary crowded with career Republican politicians. But there are risks for him if he turns the debate stage in Cleveland into another episode of the reality show his campaign has sometimes resembled.”
Then again, ABC News reports that he is just going to "wing it," which is great news for us watching for mere entertainment value:
“Candidates usually spend hours and hours preparing for a major debate — reading up the issues, going through practice Q & A sessions or mock debates and practicing lines to use when the big moment comes. Not Donald Trump,” ABC News reports. Said one senior adviser: “Trump doesn’t rehearse… I have no idea what to expect. I’m just as clueless as you about what he’ll do.” “It’s not that his political team hasn’t tried. Trump’s aides have prepared him memos on the issues and the expected lines of questions and potential attacks from the other candidates, but there have been no formal debate prep sessions, no mock Q & A, no practice debates.”
Carper Leaning Yes. Coons Leans War.

Carper Leaning Yes. Coons Leans War.

68 Comments
Unthankfully, Chris Coons, supposedly the smart one, is leaning no.
Sen. Chris Coons, who was personally lobbied by President Barack Obama and national security adviser Susan Rice to back the deal during a trip to Africa in July, said the view of the accord was about evenly split in his home state of Delaware in the first few days after the announcement. But the Democrat now says telephone calls against the deal outnumber those in favor by 10-to-1 in his state, an avalanche of opposition he has no choice but to listen to. “I am a Democrat, and I would like to be able to support this agreement,” Coons said. “But I have serious reservations about it.”
Let me make some things crystal clear for the Senator. If you vote no, you are not a Democrat. If you vote no, you want and desire immediate war. The day after you vote no, you and I can meet at Elaine Manlove's office, and I will help you fill out the forms to change your registration to the Republican Party. Your next election is not until 2020, but I will make it my life's work to deny you renomination and reelection. You will be the Joe Lieberman of Delaware. You think we hold Tom Carper in disdain for his moderation at times, just wait to see what we do to you. I can give two shits about conservative astro-turf phone calls to your office. This is one of those issues where you substitute your own judgment and your knowledge for the people's rather than just being a conduit of what an unintelligent Sussex County teabagger thinks. And if you genuinely have reservations about this deal, let me tell you something: everyone has reservations about this deal. This is a deal with an adversary. An enemy. Someone and something we do not trust. If you did not have reservations about this deal, you would be an idiot. I have reservations about this deal. We have to see whether Iran sticks to it. That is my reservation. And if they do not, guess what Senator... WE CAN BOMB THEM THEN. WE CAN REIMPOSE SANCTIONS THEN. WE CAN GO TO WAR THEN. To vote no now means you unequivocally want war now. It means you do not want to even give peace and inspections a chance. It means you have no brain. It means you are a Republican. If you are really taking into account the phone calls of those who do nothing all day but sit at home and watch Fox News, please remember, they voted for Christine O'Donnell. They never voted for you. They never will. And besides, your next election is in 2020. Chances are they will be dead by then anyway. Seriously though, to base a vote of this importance on feedback your office receives makes me question your suitability and ability to perform your job. It also makes me think you are a coward. Whether you fear the voters or you fear your donors, or both, you are still acting out of fear. DL readers, since it appears the so wise Senator places great value on the calls he gets, take a moment and call 202-224-5042, say you are a Democrat, say that he will support the Iran Deal or he will not be the Democratic nominee in 2020. Say all that. It's time to clobber our mealy mouthed federal representation over the head.
A view from the 18th Special

A view from the 18th Special

10 Comments
Someone help me out. Specials are important, and Democrats typically suck at them. I don't know how to respond to the poll question on the right, should I pick "The Republicans" based on past performance? I have been invited to a fundraiser for Eileen O'Shaughnessy-Coleman, and haven't been invited to a fundraiser for David Bentz, but that doesn't tell me anything. (I think I opted out of the DelDem mailing list because the drivel was depressing, but stayed on the DEGOP mailing list because Copeland's drivel is hilarious.) So what's the scoop internet tubes? Work your crowdsourcing magic.
Five basic facts on the recent shootings in/near _Nashville_

Five basic facts on the recent shootings in/near _Nashville_

14 Comments
Details of today's shooting are still emerging, but these are the facts we have so far: 1) It is "too soon" to talk about how this shooting fits into our approach to gun control. 2) Our approach to gun control makes it easy for anyone [even people who “exhibited extreme erratic behavior and has made ominous as well as disturbing statements”] to get guns legally and kill multiple people. 3) In spite of the fact that every other western industrialized country manages to restrict criminals and the mentally deranged from obtaining guns, any changes (and I mean ANY CHANGES) in our approach to gun control are impossible because they would naturally and inexorably lead to tyranny. 4) Congress and the national headquarters of the NRA are both places which restrict 2nd Amendment rights. 5) The NRA took in over $300 million in revenue in 2013.