Reid: Republican’s reaction to Libyan militant capture “shocking” “disgusting” “insulting” “pathetic”

Reid got one thing wrong - it the Republican's reaction isn't shocking. For me "shocking" indicates some element of surprise.
"It doesn't matter what your ideology is, you should feel good about this. There’s no conspiracy here, this is actual news. But the reaction of some of the Republicans, I’ve been told, is to downplay and insult the brave men and women of our special forces and the FBI. They’re trying to say, oh, it’s no big deal. I wonder if the men and women who captured the terrorist agree. But the Republicans said it's no big deal. Even in these days of polarization, created by the obstruction, the delay, and diversion of the Republicans, even in these days of polarization, their reaction is shocking and disgusting. They’re so obsessed with criticism, criticizing anything President Obama does. They’ll go so far as to sit here and insult the men and women in uniform and in law enforcement. They should stop and think, just for a little bit, about what it’s like to put your life on the line and to do something for our country -- that’s what they did. They’re insulting these good men and women who did some courageous things, heroic things, in order to criticize President Obama. I think they’ve lost touch with reality; it’s really pathetic, there’s no other word for it."
Tuesday Open Thread [6.17.14]

Tuesday Open Thread [6.17.14]

Iraq was ALWAYS going to collapse, because it was a made up country to begin with, with three major ethnic groups that hated each other. Vice President Joe Biden, it turns out, was the smartest and most prescient US elected official regarding Iraq, because he has for years lobbied for the breakup of Iraq into three different states. One of the main reasons those of us who opposed the war did so was because we knew this would happen and, short of, occupying Iraq forever and slaughtering its entire population, there was no way to stop it. But now the very same people who lied us into war criticize Obama for not going back in guns blazing. Matthew Yglesias:
The logic on display here shows the toxic self-justifying nature of American military adventures. If a war accomplishes its stated objectives, that goes to show that war is great. If a war fails to accomplish its stated objectives — as the Bush-era surge miserably failed to produce a durable political settlement in Iraq — then that simply proves that more war was called for. But there is simply no reason to believe that the presence of American soldiers in Iraq makes a durable political settlement more likely, and there never has been. If eight years weren't enough, why would one more — or two more or twenty more — be the key to success? The truth is the opposite. The speed with which the apparent gains of the surge melted away in the face of Iraq's entrenched domestic political problems underscores how futile the US-led campaign there was. The US military is the finest military in the world, the sharp spear of the mightiest empire in human history. But the considerable virtues of America's fighting forces do not give it any particular expertise in micro-managing Iraqi politics. And the fundamentals in Iraq have simply never been very good for a peaceful and democratic settlement. The country is not only divided between sectarian groups, but sandwiched between two rival regional powers, with Iran tending to favor Shiite interests, Saudi Arabia tending to favor Sunni ones, and neither power having any particular interest in democracy and pluralism. Throw in the well-known phenomenon of the oil curse and the country's lack of stable institutions, and you've got a recipe for problems, problems that a bunch of heavily armed young people — no matter how well-intentioned or well-led — are not capable of solving.
We were right to leave. We are right to stay out. They were wrong to go in. And we should not listen to their advice again.
America’s True Democratic Process

America’s True Democratic Process

Midterm elections are right around the corner, just less than five months away now, and the American people are going to head out to the polls and triumphantly elect new members of the US House of Representatives and a significant portion of the United States Senate. Voters will decide based on a wide range of issues which candidate best suits their needs and which candidate will best represent them in Congress. Overall, a large portion of the nation will vote, and we’ll get to see the miracle of democracy in action. Ha, sike. Funny, isn’t it? On election day 2014 about 62 million voters, or around 36% of the electorate, will decide who will make the nation’s laws for the next two years, or six for some senators (or 36 for some Kentucky Senators). Overall if the 2014 elections look anything like the 2010 elections (let’s truly hope they don’t), the youth vote will be several percent smaller, turnout will be significantly lower, and the average American won’t vote. Going into the full-swing election season opinion polls show 66% of Americans or more want new members of Congress, 68% see Republicans as out of touch, 73% are in favor of a minimum wage increase, 59% think money should be distributed more evenly, and Democrats lead on Health Care, Energy, the Environment, Minimum Wage, Immigration, and tie on the economy by most polls. Yet, on November 4th, 2014, it’s increasingly likely that not only will we most certainly elect a Republican speaker of the House, but also a Republican senate majority leader. How exactly does this happen?
People Write About Hillary

People Write About Hillary

Then there's the double standard, which I suppose we've got another few years to listen to. Media Matters asks why the press went crazy in characterizing Hillary Clinton as "testy" or listing gaffes that weren't when Chris Christie famously and routinely berates everyone in front of him with nary a "testy" peep from the press:
But apparently she was supposed to roll over. Because by standing up for herself (while never raising her voice), Clinton was breathlessly tagged as combative and unnerved in the wake of a mildly contentious back-and-forth:

Late Night Video — Out of Sight, Out of Mind

This isn't a video tonight, you'll have to click on the picture below to see the interactive graphic that shows monthly the casualties from US drone strikes. This is a sobering picture (even if a good chunk of their data (the Other category) isn't well defined. It is also a very well-done infographic:

The Current Situation in Iraq is George Bush’s fault. Period.

To be Republican is to loud and wrong and loudly wrong whenever possible. The noise is so wrong and so loud and kept up for so long that weak minded people (the national media for example) sometimes mistake the persistence for legitimacy. Volume for validity. So if you hear one of your liberal minded friends fall prey to to thinking that Obama "has his share of blame" for Iraq - quickly correct them. Bush enabled the current Sunni power in Iraq by invading Iraq under false pretenses, and with no plan for the occupation. Bush elevated Osama bin Laden and Bin Laden's dreams to legitimacy. Bush removed Saddam Hussein, Bin Laden's key enemy in the region and shattered Iraq’s tenuous factional stability. And, Bush bequeathed military and political power to radicalized Sunni's that would have been unthinkable prior to our handing over arms by the crate load, and tens of millions of dollars for "rebuilding" that was delivered in duffel bags off the back of trucks.

Monday Open Thread [6.16.14]

Andrew Sullivan believes we, the United States, are in a Cold Civil War, and have been for some time, after watching the alternative reality that is presented on Fox News as news. He points out that now, even inter-marriage between the ideologies of liberal and conservative is frowned upon more and more.
Three-out-of-ten (30%) consistent conservatives say they would be unhappy if an immediate family member married a Democrat and about a quarter (23%) of across-the-board liberals say the same about the prospect of a Republican in-law.
But two of his commenters aren't concerned. Why? Because of the age of the average Fox News Viewer.
New Jersey — Where Corporate Subsidies Aren’t Improving the Economy

New Jersey — Where Corporate Subsidies Aren’t Improving the Economy

Interesting. A NJ think tank -- New Jersey Policy Perspective -- has a report out the shows that while subsidies to NJ businesses have surged under Governor Christie's administration (subsidies that are billed as economy boosting), NJ's economy has remained pretty sluggish. According to this report, $4bn worth of subsidies had been awarded to businesses in the past four and a half years by state authorities under Christie – more than three times the $1.2bn in subsidies that were given out in the prior 10 years. Got that? That's $4 billion dollars worth of corporate subsides for this result:
Iraq Is Burning

Iraq Is Burning

Again. Or, really, it never stopped burning and now there is gas on the fire. You already know that Iraq is under siege, this time by a group called ISIS, which seems to be a coalition of Sunni forces, Baathists, remnants of Al Queda in Iraq, Syrian and other foreign fighters. ISIS has been capturing territory with some ease, and the Kurds are using the chaos to grab back some land they've been claiming. Back home, this has been one more occasion for the GOP to rattle their sabers -- calling for action in a country who has had plenty of US action. President Obama has said the usual "all options are on the table" except right now it doesn't look like boots on the ground is an option.

Thursday Open Thread [6.12.14]

A tea party House candidate in Oklahoma has endorsed stoning gays to death. Meanwhile, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) compared homosexuality to alcoholism during a visit to California.
The Texas Republican Party this month adopted a platform supporting access to 'reparative therapy' for gays and lesbians, a widely discredited process intended to change sexual orientation. In response to an audience question about it Wednesday night, Perry said he did not know whether the therapy worked. Said Perry: "Whether or not you feel compelled to follow a particular lifestyle or not, you have the ability to decide not to do that. I may have the genetic coding that I'm inclined to be an alcoholic, but I have the desire not to do that, and I look at the homosexual issue the same way."
That rebranding continues apace.