Gawker Answers Jason330’s Super Bowl Team Question

Gawker Answers Jason330’s Super Bowl Team Question

In fact, I think they kinda copied Jason. Thus, as a lawyer, I will be preparing a lawsuit against Nick Denton's multi million dollar enterprise forthwith. On Jason's behalf of course. Jason, my cut is 33%. Here is what Jason said 11 days ago. Gawker, like Jason, initially found the matchup to be a draw, until digging deeper. Gawker went to the trouble to ask actual experts, who went with the Seahawks. Jason just went to his store of superior knowledge of the animal kingdom, and likewise found the Seahawk superior. 11 days ago.

Friday Open Thread [1.31.14]

When Chris Christie Bridgegate scandal broke, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was on air that weekend supporting the New Jersey Governor. Now Giuliani says it is "fifty-fifty" over whether Christie was lying and in fact knew about the bridge closures. Georgia Governor Nathan Deal (R) runs a clinic on how to response when you fuck up and are facing criticism: you accept responsibility and apologize rather than blame others and dodge accountability (the path Christie chose).
Deal "called for a top-to-bottom review of the government's response to the epic traffic jam in the aftermath of Tuesday's snowfall and he and the state's top emergency staffer apologized for failing to adequately prepare for the storm." Said Deal: 'I am not satisfied with the response. But I am not going to look for a scapegoat. I am the governor, and the buck stops with me.'"
Those that follow Deal's example tend to survive crisis, and those that follow Christie's path don't.

Thursday Open Thread [1.30.14]

We have a lot a polling goodness for today's Open Thread. First, a new Pew Research poll shows Americans perceive Republicans as the fringe uncompromising petulant radical party that no one wants to invite to a party for fear they will show up drunk and start a fight. Meanwhile, Democrats are seen an more willing to work with the other party, by a margin of 52% to 27%. The Democratic agenda, as espoused by President Obama in his State of the Union Address, is thoroughly enjoyed and approved of by the American people. 1. Ending the Afghanistan War after 12 long years. Republicans sat on their hands and refused to clap when the President said this. 66% of Americans stood, cheered and clapped with the Democrats. 2. Congress shouldn't shut down government or threaten the full faith and credit of the United States. Republicans sat on their hands and refused to clap when the President said this. 80% of Americans stood, cheered and clapped with the Democrats. 3. Congress should repeal tax breaks for Big Oil. Republicans sat on their hands and refused to clap when the President said this. 74% of Americans stood, cheered and clapped with the Democrats. 4. Congress should restore unemployment insurance that it let expire at the end of the year. Republicans sat on their hands and refused to clap when the President said this. 58% of Americans stood, cheered and clapped with the Democrats. 5. Women deserve equal pay for equal work. Republicans sat on their hands and refused to clap when the President said this. 90% of Americans stood, cheered and clapped with the Democrats. 6. Nobody who works full time should have to raise a family in poverty, so Congress should raise the minimum wage to $10.10. Republicans sat on their hands and refused to clap when the President said this. 71% of Americans stood, cheered and clapped with the Democrats.
What’s wrong with bowling?

What’s wrong with bowling?

That's a rhetorical question. Everyone knows that it is the scoring. Bowling scoring is stupid. Bowling would be doing itself a huge favor if it changed the scoring to the way "Match Play" golf is scored. It would be a 9 frame game and the winner would be the first person to win 5 frames outright, or win the most after 9. This has been another installment of "Jason330 Fixes the World" You're welcome Bowling! PS. Anyone up for a DL bowling meetup to road test this system?
Wednesday Open Thread [1.29.14]

Wednesday Open Thread [1.29.14]

Andrew Sullivan:
The metaphor of the soldier slowly, relentlessly, grindingly putting his life back together was a powerful one for America – and Obama pulled off that analogy with what seemed to me like real passion. One aspect of his personality and his presidency is sometimes overlooked – and that is persistence. He’s been hailed as a hero and dismissed as irrelevant many times. But when you take a step back and assess what he has done – from ending wars to rescuing the economy to cementing a civil rights revolution to shifting the entire landscape on healthcare – you can see why he believes in persistence. Because it works. It may not win every news cycle; but it keeps coming back. If he persists on healthcare and persists on Iran and persists on grappling, as best we can, with the forces creating such large disparities in wealth, he will look far, far more impressive from the vantage point of history than the news cycle of the Twitterverse sometimes conveys. This was True Grit Obama. And it was oddly energizing.
When the book closes on this Presidency, given all he has done, President Obama will rank pretty high. Not among the greats like FDR, Lincoln, and Washington. But I think he will be regarding among the very good: Kennedy, Reagan, Clinton, Eisenhower, Truman; and not among the very bad: Carter, Bush II, Nixon, Hoover, and Buchanan.
State Of The Union Open Thread

State Of The Union Open Thread

Have at it!  I'll be here all night! (Am I the only one that loves these things?  Is that wrong? Or really weird?) [Update from Delaware Dem]: Some excerpts of the speech are starting to leak, as they always do. The White House, all White Houses, do this to prep the ground and give the pundits something to talk about in the run up to the speech. Here is one such excerpt...
President Obama’s Election Reform Commission-Small Ideas

President Obama’s Election Reform Commission-Small Ideas

Last week the President's election reform Commission published its report with their ideas on reforming our election systems. The ideas seemed to be to improved voter participation, particularly in national elections. Because it was intended to provide a bi-partisan answer to our obvious electoral deficiencies, the solutions proposed, while mostly helpful, were incremental and did not offer answers to our long-standing crisis in our so-called participatory republican democracy.
Joe Scarborough Thinks He’s Found <i>A Way To Shut This Whole</i> Hillary <i>Thing Down</i>

Joe Scarborough Thinks He’s Found A Way To Shut This Whole Hillary Thing Down

Here's Joe Scarborough pretending to think out loud over whether "invoking Monica Lewinsky against Hillary Clinton could be an appropriate tactic."
"If Hillary Clinton attacks the Republican Party's handling of women, and treatment of women and disrespect for women, and suggests they’re misogynists et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, it does seem to be a fair question to ask right now, a few years out, does the media have a responsibility to say, ‘Well, let’s see what happened when you were in the White House, and how women were treated when you were in the governor’s mansion and the White House?’ Is that fair?" the 'Morning Joe' host asked Monday morning, as quoted by Mediaite. [...] "Does this not compromise Hillary Clinton's ability to bash Republicans as being terrible toward women, misogynist, et cetera?" he asked.
How exactly would Republicans use Bill Clinton's infidelity against Hillary Clinton?  How does that look?  Would they say she was a-okay with infidelity because, if she wasn't then she would have divorced him?  Would they say she's sexist and misogynist because she's married to a man who had an affair?  Most likely they would do what they love to do and tell Hillary to sit down and shut up... maybe they could even tell her to go make them a sandwich. But whatever route they choose they will end up putting forth this message:  Ladies, you are merely an extension of your husbands.  Your opinions will only be considered if they align with your husband's opinion and behavior.  If they don't, well... then you may not speak on certain subjects.