Carper undecided on “humanitarian” war – sounds surprisingly like an actual human

Carper undecided on “humanitarian” war – sounds surprisingly like an actual human

WDDE Reports that Tom Carper, unlike Chris Coons, is still undecided on bombing Syrian weddings and funerals. The surprising thing in the story is that Carper calls out Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld directly and sounds kinda like a human being doing so.
We got hoodwinked once about ten years ago by an earlier administration on bad intelligence that alleged that the Iraqis — Saddam Hussein — had used chemical weapons. It turned out not to be true,” said Carper. “In this case, we want to make sure that the assertions, the allegations are indeed true.”
Then he tips his hand and allows that he is probably going to vote "yes" anyway.
The Progressive Divide on Syria

The Progressive Divide on Syria

Last night at the PDD meeting in New Castle, there was a lively discussion about a proposed resolution opposing the military authorization before Congress. The resolution is inside. The vote at the meeting was nearly evenly split, with one more vote approving the resolution than not. The vote continues today online at the PDD Facebook page and through email (pddemail@gmail.com). This progressive divide should not have been surprising but it was. For it was already playing out in the editorial pages of the News Journal.
Coons votes for unwinable “humanitarian” war for dubious reasons

Coons votes for unwinable “humanitarian” war for dubious reasons

As a menber of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Chris Coons voted with a narrow majority to give President Barack Obama the authority to strike Syria. While the vote speaks for itself, the questions Coons posed to John Kerry and to General Dempsey reveal that fact that Coons believes that America is the world's police force. Coons believes that the question facing Congress is not, should we police the world? But, since we are the world's police, can we do that job well? This comes through very clearly in his first question to General Dempsey.
UPDATED w/ Poll Results: Congressman Carney Statement on the Use of Chemical Weapons in Syria

UPDATED w/ Poll Results: Congressman Carney Statement on the Use of Chemical Weapons in Syria

“As a United States congressman, I take very seriously my role in ensuring the responsible use of military action. And like many of those I represent, after over a decade of war, I’m extremely wary of committing our military to another overseas conflict. As I’ve heard from many of my constituents, it should be the option of last resort. And our national interest must be at stake." Come inside to read the rest...
Q: What is it that you like about organized labor?

Q: What is it that you like about organized labor?

A: Organized labor is a champion of civil rights, and of our civil liberties. Labor stands for economic justice, a robust middle class and (because of lackluster performance by the Democratic Party) it is the only real check on the rapacious greed of twentieth century capitalism right now. What’s not to like about a movement with such high aspirations?
Today’s Moment of GOP Derp

Today’s Moment of GOP Derp

The RightOnLine conference probably produced many moments of Derp, but this one, by Bill Whittle (advertised as conservative writer and TV editor), has emerged as one for the ages. One of the real holy grails for the conservative movement is to find some way to get their narratives captured by the "popular culture". Even though they widely disdain much of the "popular culture" -- not just because they think its politics are all wrong, but also the reason why the Kids Are Not All Right. But Mr. Whittle has a new theory -- that the show Family Guy is the reason why the GOP can't get its message heard. Family Guy.
Gary Simpson utterly duped by Cato Institute – Or – Are we paying legislators too much for too little actual thinking ?

Gary Simpson utterly duped by Cato Institute – Or – Are we paying legislators too much for too little actual thinking ?

Genius, Gary Simpson today parrots a Cato Institute report that basically says that we are treating people on welfare too well. Not the corporations on welfare taking down the big buck in the form of tax breaks, mind you. The actual poor people on food-stamps that the Republicans keep saying have too much money.
My point falls in line with the conclusion of the Cato report, that “the current welfare system provides such a high level of benefits that it acts as a disincentive for work,” and that “recipients are likely to choose welfare over work, thus increasing long-term dependence.”
I'll leave it to that left wing outfit, the Wall Street Journal , to completely demolish the Cato Institutes premise that we have created "welfare dependency" (spoiler alert, we haven't. "According to the latest report on welfare dependency (covering 2009, the worst year of the recession), about 4.6% of the population received more than half of its income from the three main means-tested welfare programs: Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), food stamps and supplemental security income. That’s up from 2007, when about 3.5% were dependent on welfare.")

Tuesday Open Thread 9.3.13

I would like to thank President Obama for taking my advice on Friday. Obviously my admonition caused the President to go for a long walk with his Chief of Staff to rethink his strategy. Here is what I said:
80% of Americans believe President Obama should receive congressional approval before using force in Syria. 80% of Americans cannot agree on anything, Mr. President. They agree on this. This is a no-fucking-brainer, Mr. President. You want a way out of that fucking corner you painted yourself into, this is it. Seek Congressional Authorization. If you don’t get it, your hands have been tied by Congress just as David Cameron’s were.
I wonder if my free form use of expletives was the thing that convinced him. Who knows. Now, to the vote in Congress, from Roll Call:
"At some point Boehner will have to make a decision and presumably rally his troops. Whether they will follow is an open question. Already, there is tension between the House Republican and Democratic camps over who will shoulder the burden of providing the votes to avoid a historic defeat for the president. GOP aides suggested Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who has strongly backed the president, will have to provide the bulk of the votes. But a Democratic leadership aide put the onus back on Boehner."
I think the Resolution will pass the Senate easily, with more than 60 votes. I think some liberals and libertarians and whatever it is Ted Cruz is will vote against. In the House, it is a much dicier proposition. I honestly do not expect it to pass. With both parties already fighting over who has to do the Whip operation, it means that both parties already know they don't have the votes.
The right is confounded by Obama on Syria

The right is confounded by Obama on Syria

For wingnuts, up is the new down. Trying to make sense out of what passes for commentary among wignuts is a mug's game. They hate President Obama with a white hot passion. The President is horrible, trying to accrue king like powers to himself in pursuit of a socialist kingship. But wait...this horrible President suddenly needs to hurry up and act more kingly with respect to Congress, or socialism and chaos will ensue. Because socialism flows from collaboration, (which in this case is a trick because he is trying to put congress in the scapegoat seat with this phony collaboration.) Get it? No? Me neither. Suffice it to say, because of Obama nefarious tricks, future Republican Presidents will not be able to bomb the world's brownish people on a whim. The horror!