Tag Archives: Delaware General Assembly

Legislative Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Wed., Jan. 27, 2010

POST-GAME WRAPUP:

Lotsa brand new bills and brand new committee assignments for them. I’ll discuss the ones I find interesting (and/or worrisome) in my  Pre-Game Show report below.

As noted here yesterday, the Senate considered and passed a series of non-controversial house bills. Perhaps the most notable of the lot is HB 249 (Keeley), which requires pharmacists to provide patients with their records when requested. I have to assume that there must have been an incident which inspired this legislation, although I can’t imagine a pharmacist refusing to provide such information. Since all of the house bills were passed yesterday without Senate amendments being added,  they now go the the Governor for his signature.

In cases where amendments are added in the other house, the bill must return to the house of origin as the bill must be passed identically in both chambers before going to the Governor.

Which puts us smack-dab in the middle of yet another teaching opportunity. Yay!

Let’s mosey on over to the House to see this process in action, shall we? Rep. B. Short’s HB 140 originally passed the House unanimously. The Senate added an amendment to the bill, then passed it (with Sen. Bunting going ‘Not Voting’ b/c his insurance business could represent a conflict-of-interest), and sent it back to the House. An amended bill does not have to go back through the committee process, and the bill was again passed unanimously in the House. It now goes to the Governor’s office for final action.

In other House action, HB 300(Bennett), which requires prompt state responses to FOIA requests, passed unanimously. It really is hard to overstate just how far the General Assembly has come on open government issues the past couple of years. In times past, a bill like this very easily could have ‘disappeared’ into someone’s desk drawer. I predict that it won’t happen in the Senate, where it now heads.

There were a couple of revenue bills stricken. One, HB 265 (Longhurst), would have restored Delaware’s Estate Tax, which only impacts the Filthy Rich. I fully expect a new piece of legislation to replace this one. However, if this is yet another unilateral surrender on the part of the D’s, then it once again raises the question as to who represents the ‘Democratic wing of the Democratic Party’.

PRE-GAME SHOW

The Senate has an agenda, and at least one of the bills, SB 182(Hall-Long), is virtually guaranteed to be worked today as it has been scheduled for a Day Certain (today). Bills are generally scheduled for a Day Certain when there are a number of interested parties (in this case, probably the membership of the Delaware Nurses Association) who may wish to attend and/or comment upon legislation. A bill of this sort can be scheduled for the agenda days in advance of its actual consideration to enable people to make plans to participate. And, yes, I just slipped another teaching opportunity by you.

Speaking of slipping things by you, it appears that Del-Tech’s gremlins are at it again. SB 202(Venables) purports to be a revenue omnibus bill, clearing up a few fiscal odds & ends. Imagine my (lack of) surprise when I found this gift to Del-Tech tucked in there:

Section 4.  Owens Campus Energy House.  Delaware Technical & Community College shall apply for all State and local permits and approvals required by any applicable provision of the Delaware Code, or any ordinance, rule or regulation enacted pursuant thereto in connection with the design and construction of the Owens Campus Energy House; provided, nevertheless, that any such permit or approval shall be granted within 10 working days from the date upon which the College makes application therefor. If any required permit or approval is not granted within 10 working days as set forth above, the College may commence construction and shall be immune from any legal action or liability for failing to obtain such permit or approval.

Got that? They can’t be turned down even if warranted, and they can start construction with or without permits or approvals. Lonnie George sure earns his salary. It may be the greatest project of all time for all I know, but it’s a project with a legalized end-run around the permitting process. All  together now: The Delaware Way in action. BTW, SB 202 is on today’s Senate agenda.

*Sigh*.  OK on to today’s committee meetings. In the Senate:

SB 201(Bushweller) Senate Public Safety Committee-Codifies new structure of the Delaware Health Information Network. This bill deserves some serious questioning. First, state immunity is being extended to a ‘not-for-profit, public/private corporation’.  Also, while the synopsis talks about ‘patient advocates’ being represented in the process that led to this bill, it looks a lot like an  insiders’ reunion with ‘patient advocates’ serving as convenient window dressing.  Appearances could be wrong, but that’s why this bill requires clarification, IMHO.

Senate Executive Committee-The secrecy continues. Consideration of gubernatorial nominees. No names listed. Pathetic. Tony DeLuca says, “None of your bleeping business.” Maybe, just maybe, the Governor’s office would release the names of those being considered, if they even know who DeLuca has blessed.

Senate Judiciary Committee-Pete Schwartzkopf’s HB 310, legalizing and establishing table games in Delaware, has been assigned to a favorable committee and likely will be fast-tracked for a vote in the entire Senate tomorrow.

House Committee Meetings:

House Economic Development/Banking/Insurance/Commerce Committee-HB 303(Keeley)-Places restrictions and sanctions on predatory lenders.

House Gaming and Parimutuels Committee-SB 188(DeLuca)-The companion table gaming bill to HB 310. I expect both bills to head to the Governor by the end of session tom’w.

House Transportation/Land Use and Infrastructure Committee-HJR 8(Carson)-Determined to fix something (one of the few things) that ain’t broke, one of Dover’s worst legislators proposes a pilot program to have new car dealers perform auto inspections. Presumably because it works so well in Pennsylvania. A buncha Kent County/Middletown-area legislators are pushing for this. Must be some bucks being thrown around south of the Canal. Doesn’t that Willis guy have his car dealerships there?

Folks, bring your popcorn. Some interesting stuff going on in Dover today.

Be back tomorrow to clean up after the elephants and to see what they left behind…


Legislative Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Tues., Jan. 26, 2010

Last week that the General Assembly meets until breaking for about a 6-week recess to enable the Joint Finance Committee to conduct budget hearings.

POST-GAME WRAP-UP

A few bills previously discussed here were passed on Thursday. In the Senate:

SB 81 w/SA5(Sokola)-Requires nutritional information to be prominently displayed in fast food restaurants. 15 yes, 5 nos. Who voted which way on this bill? I don’t know b/c the Senate does not put roll call votes online, just the vote totals. And, since the Senate also does not put the Senate Journal online, you’re basically SOL unless you were there.

This practice is a complete and total mockery of the idea of open government. This practice should change immediately.  Either that or explain to the public why they aren’t entitled to hold their Senators accountable for their votes by knowing HOW they voted. Plus, sometimes, roll calls ARE provided. Who decides which ones are and which ones aren’t?

SB 189(McDowell)-Clarifies that costs for state green energy projects be paid for out of energy savings, and not from general revenue streams. One senator voted against this, I know not who.

In the House:

All gambling revenues, all the time. Rep. Schwartzkopf’s HB 310, which authorizes the introduction and operation of table games in Delaware, finally passed with several amendments attached. But not before impassioned debate on how to ensure that legislators don’t get cushy casino jobs (it was finally done by amendment). It is a testament to the ethical standards of the General Assembly that such a discussion was even necessary.

Final vote on passage was 27 yes, 5 no, 6 not voting, and three absent. Bill goes to the Senate, where I expect it to be fast-tracked this week before recess for JFC.

PRE-GAME SHOW

Senate Agenda-The Senate is scheduled to consider a fairly pro-forma and non-controversial set of house bills today. Today’s agenda does afford me yet one more teaching opportunity. Yay! When you click on the agenda, you will notice that, in addition to the prime House sponsor, a Senator’s name will be appear in parentheses. This does not mean that said Senator is even a sponsor on the bill although, of course, they could be. What it does mean is that said Senator chaired the committee that released the bill to the floor and, as such, is the designated floor manager for the bill. The senator may, and often does, defer to a senator more directly involved with the bill, such as a key co-sponsor.

House Agenda-Today’s agenda is highlighted by HB 300(Bennett), which requires a state agency response to a FOIA request within 10 business days. I expect smooth sailing for this one.

There’s also an interesting, if unnecessary, constitutional amendment, that brings Delaware’s state constitution into compliance with Federal law that makes 18 the legal voting age.

Hey, kids, another teaching opportunity! Amendments to the Delaware Constitution must be passed by two consecutive sessions of the Delaware General Assembly. They can’t be enacted by passing them in two consecutive years of the same session. I believe, constitutional attorneys are welcome to prove me wrong, that constitutional amendments are not subject to the Governor’s signature.

That’s it for today. Please check back tomorrow for very busy committee days and some likely votes as well.

Legislative Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show-Thursday, Jan. 21, 2010

Post-Game Wrap-Up

I interrupt this report to start out today with a raging screed. To the surprise of absolutely nobody.

Yesterday, the Delaware State Senate unanimously approved the nomination of Diane Clarke Streett to become a judge on Superior Court. I know this because the Governor’s office sent out a congratulatory release about this. However, not a word of this is in the official Session Activity Report that is posted on the General Assembly’s website. And, to make matters worse, the Senate still does not post its Daily Journal (the official session record) online. The House has posted its Journal online forever. There simply is  no excuse for this. It is time for the Senate to stop deliberately withholding basic information from the public.  It serves no purpose other than to make the Senate look like it’s hiding something.

It is possible that the Senate approved other nominations yesterday, but I don’t know as there no official record of them. If a confirmation takes place and nobody hears of it, did it really happen?

OK, that major cavil aside, here’s what I know happened yesterday, aka the official, although incomplete, record.

The Senate passed a key piece of legislation designed to hasten the implementation of table gaming in Delaware. SB 188 (Sen. DeLuca) establishes criminal offenses and penalties relating to cheating at table games and/or avoiding taxes on winnings. It is a companion piece to HB 310 (Rep. Schwartzkopf), which authorizes the introduction and operation of table games in Delaware. HB 310 was released from House committee yesterday, and is expected to be worked today. It is clearly the intent of the General Assembly leadership and the Governor to have this legislation enacted into law before the General Assembly breaks for Joint Finance Committee hearings at the end of January.

Also, both House and Senate committees released a myriad of bills yesterday. I will defer discussion on them until and unless they surface on an agenda.

Pre-Game Show

Governor Jack Markell delivers his State of the State Address today at 2 p.m. It is not likely to cause anyone to well up with unbridled optimism. A reworking of the state’s Blue Collar Jobs Act will provide upfront financial incentive for businesses creating new jobs. The News-Journal’s Jeff Montgomery reports the story here. While admirable, the $10 million available for this initiative really is just a drop in the bucket and illustrates how circumscribed the state is in jump-starting economic development.

No doubt the address and reaction to it will highlight today’s activities.

SENATE AGENDA

Of primary interest to me are SB 189 (Sen. McDowell) and SB 81 (Sen. Sokola), both previously discussed in detail here. McDowell’s bill will likely move through with little or no opposition. Sokola’s nutrition labeling bill appears likely to encounter some opposition.

HOUSE AGENDA

The first two items on the agenda are notable. Rep. Schwartzkopf’s table gaming bill, HB 310, is expected to be worked today, and should pass with a comfortable margin, although there will almost certainly be a few ‘no’s.

HB 300, sponsored by Rep. Bennett, requires a timely (within 10 days) response by state agencies to FOIA requests. The bill was released from committee yesterday. It likely will meet with unanimous approval.

BTW, this is not only good policy, but smart politics. Kids, if you’re looking to protect your freshman legislators, you make sure that they get bills like this to sponsor. Bennett can now run as a good/open government advocate. No downside whatsoever.

For me, I’m on the downside until Tuesday, when the next legislative wrap-up/preview comes your way.

Legislative Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show-Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Post-Game Wrap-Up

A complete record of yesterday’s activity is here.

The House of Representatives, with the notable exception of Rep. Earl Jaques, had no problem putting a registered lobbyist on a medical advisory board, and approved HB 3, discussed here in detail yesterday. Any member of the House is welcome to come here and explain why this is a good thing. I won’t hold my breath. This kind of casual path-of-least-resistance legislating is but a small illustration of the Delaware Way in action. Easy to rationalize, especially when one is drawn to the allure of the Delaware Way and the campaign checks it generates.

Sen. Sokola’s bill requiring fast food restaurants to prominently display nutritional information was tabled in the Senate. This generally means one, or more, of the following: (1) it’s running into more roadblocks than expected during floor debate; (2) amendments will be needed to address issues raised on the floor; and/or (3) the legislators want to go home. The bill likely will be back. It can be removed from the table at the sponsor’s request, assuming there are no objections.

As an informational point for those new to the process, you will note that two bills were ‘stricken’ yesterday at the sponsors’ request. This does not mean that the issue addressed in the bill is dead, but rather that there were likely some technical defects in the bill that were not fixable  by amendment. I would expect substitute bills to be introduced.

Pre-Game Show

Governor Markell will preview his upcoming State of the State address this afternoon. The Governor’s Office promises that the address will focus on “a new economic development policy to attract and expand jobs for Delaware”. The ‘rollout’, or preview, takes place at 1:30 this afternoon. The actual address takes place tomorrow at 2 p.m. No doubt, this will be the most discussed development of the day.

For the House, it’s once again Committees R Us Day. Here is the complete list of scheduled House committee meetings. You can click on each committee listing to find the committee agenda.

Here are some of today’s items that I find interesting:

HB 310 (Schwartzkopf)-Provides for legalization of table games in Delaware. House Gaming & Parimutuels Committee.

HB 303 (Keeley)-Seeks to curtail predatory lending practices, including ‘payday loans’. House Economic Development/Banking/Insurance/Commerce Committee.

HB 300 (Bennett)-Requires state  agencies to respond to FOIA requests within 10 business days. House Administration Committee.

Usual Disclaimer: Check out any and all committee meetings you find of interest because YMMV.

As is the typical House practice on Wednesdays, there will be no working of legislation on the floor today.

The Senate has both an agenda and a committee meeting schedule.

A couple more notes for newbies. Just because a body may have an agenda, that is neither a guarantee nor a promise that said agenda will be worked on a given day. Rather, it means that, the next time a body takes up legislation, it will mostly be in the order as listed on the agenda. Although there are exceptions. Aren’t there always?

Second, when you see a meeting notice for a ‘joint’ meeting, that means that both the respective House and Senate committees are meeting together. This is usually the case when someone, usually a cabinet secretary, is making a presentation.

OK, on to the Senate committee items that I find interesting:

SB 189 (McDowell)-While I’ll need Tommywonk to make sure that I haven’t screwed up yet again, I think this bill clarifies that any state obligations to pay contractors for savings realized from making buildings more energy-efficient comes directly from the savings and not from other state sources. One of the coolest features of these state sustainable/green energy initiatives is that the savings are so good that contractors are delighted to be remunerated out of cost savings. The more energy-efficient the job, the more everyone benefits. Am I right, Mr. Wonk? Senate Energy & Transit Committee.

Senate Executive Committee-Nominations from the Governor. Tsk, tsk, bad form, Sen. DeLuca. As did Uncle Thurm, the new President Pro-Tem fails to give public notice as to which nominees will be considered. There is no justification for keeping the public in the dark like this. I would hope that this would change, and that members of the Senate would demand that it change.

See ya tomorrow for State of the State Day.

Legislative Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show-Tuesday, Jan. 19, 2010

The entire record of the previous legislative session (Thursday, January 14) can be found here.

Key legislation that was passed, most of it previously discussed here, included:

HB 202 (Rep. B. Short)-Designed to protect policyholders when a health or life insurance company is liquidated. Pretty sure that this bill was a Matt Denn proposal from his time as IC. Passed by both houses, will go to Governor.

HB 30 (Jaques)-Increases assessments on developers to reflect current school construction costs. Was sponsored primarily by the Middletown-area legislators to try to get a grip on exploding development. Passed House and goes to Senate. Vigorously opposed by homebuilders’ lobby. 13 Rethugs voted no. Here’s the roll call.

HB 294 (Bennett)-Passed the House w/o a dissenting vote, but will bear watching in the Senate. The bill basically eliminates some elective row office jobs in Kent County and transfers the functions to the Kent County Department of Finance. Good government bill, eliminates some political hackery in county government. So why, El Somnambulo, does this bill bear watching in the Senate?

Glad’ja asked. Because Her Royal High Potentate Nancy Cook has decreed this bill as anathema to building a career for up-and-coming political talent, and she still throws her not insubstantial avoirdupois around in the Senate. It will be interesting to see what committee is assigned this bill. As to her argument about political talent, I have two words for her: Mike and Kozakowski. I rest my case.

The Session Report for January 14 also lists some newly-introduced bills. I will not generally discuss them here as I usually leave that for my committee meeting previews and wrapups.

Today’s Preview:

Not many bills on the agenda, but a few interesting ones, including a seemingly-innocuous bill that, in fact, is a window into the Delaware Way:

SENATE AGENDA

Only bill on the agenda is nevertheless an intriguing one:

SB 81 (Sokola)-Would require chain restaurants to provide labels with complete and accurate nutritional information. There would also be an educational outreach by the Division of Public Health on obesity.

While I admire the intent of this bill, (a) the cynic in me believes that people who go to fast food places already know that the food is laden with all kinds of bad things, and they don’t care; and (b) if you’re gonna do this, why limit it to fast food places? I love Italian food, but I’ve always got a cardiologist on speed-dial when I go to an Italian restaurant. Should make for an interesting floor debate.

HOUSE AGENDA

Now, kids, sidle up closer to your computer screen as I e-whisper you some nasty facts about the Delaware Way. But, first, I’ve got an audience participation assignment for you. Read this bill, which is on today’s House Agenda:

HB 3 (Hudson)-Would add a representative from the Delaware Health Care Facilities Association to the Hospital Infection Advisory Board.

First, here is the section of the Code delineating the current members of this Board:

(c)(1) The Secretary of the Department shall appoint an Advisory Committee, which shall include 1 infection control professional who has responsibility for infection control programs from each hospital or health care system in Delaware, 4 infection disease physicians with expertise in infection control, and 1 representative from the State Division of Public Health and the Public Health Hospital Infections Specialist responsible for collating and reporting data. The Secretary shall also appoint 7 other members of the Committee including representatives from direct care nursing staff, academic researchers, consumer organizations, health insurers, health maintenance organizations, organized labor and purchasers of health insurance, such as employers. The Advisory Committee shall have the authority to engage personnel with appropriate training and/or certification in infection prevention and control for the purposes of collecting data.

To that list of 7, this bill would add a lobbyist. The Delaware Health Care Facilities Association primarily lobbies for the nursing home industry. Its Executive Director, Yrene Waldron, led the fight on behalf of the nursing home industry to thwart nursing home reform in Delaware. With Vince Meconi as Secretary of DHSS, she largely succeeded. Nursing homes are notorious for doing a poor job with infections. When they get bad enough, the patients are sent to the Emergency Room where the blame game between hospitals and nursing homes as to who was responsible, ensues. And, DHCFA’s director has led the fight to keep accurate nursing home infection information from the public.

While it may indeed make sense to have a front-line nursing home provider on this board, the public is in no way served by having a hired lobbyist on this board, especially one who has proven hostile to even the most minimal of reform efforts.

We hear talk all the time about ‘special interest’ legislation. Generally, by Rethugs who call anything helping the poor or working families as benefiting the special interests. However, HB 3 is true special interest legislation.  If they are serious about changing the Delaware Way, the House of Representatives will shoot this worthless, and possibly damaging, piece of legislation down today.

Back tomorrow, with bold opinions and boldface in tow.

Legislative Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show-Thursday, Jan. 14, 2010

According to the Legislative Record, nothing happened yesterday.

Of course, in the case of the House of Representatives, we know that committee meetings took place.

So, El Somnambulo, you may ask, why does the record not reflect this? Glad you asked as it gives me yet another teaching opportunity. Yay!

Once the House breaks for committee meetings, it often does not come back into session at the end of the day. Hence, committee reports are not read into the record then. Hence, officially, nothing happened. However, the ‘legislative day’ is different from the ‘real’ day. When the House comes back into session today, they will still be on yesterday’s business. Thence, the committee reports will be read into the record before the legislative ‘change of day’. Which is why, hence or thence, my two pence say this makes sense.

There’s another less harmless reason why the ‘legislative’ day extends into the next day, and it happens fairly frequently. Roll call is taken for each legislative day. Any time during that legislative day, you can be marked as ‘present’. If you’re a legislator who doesn’t attend a given day’s session, you can still be marked ‘present’ the next day if they haven’t ‘changed’ the legislative day yet. Legislators get a per-mile travel allowance, and it’s based on (a) the round trip distance to and from their house to Legislative Hall, times (b) the number of days that you are in attendance. So, you can still get mileage for a day that you missed by simply being marked present the next day before the legislative day has changed. Many legislators will say “Marked Present-No Mileage”, and, in fact, legislators sometimes get to Dover for committee meetings after the House has adjourned, and that’s legit. However, a few still don’t bother to show up on committee days but get the mileage allowance anyway. Plus they get a better ‘attendance’ record than they deserve.

OK. For those of you still awake, time to go to today’s preview. Of most interest to me is what’s not on the House agenda today. Since no bills were worked in the House on Tuesday, one would have expected the same agenda, plus maybe a few additions, to be before the House. However, two bills that I criticized in my Tuesday preview have been removed from the agenda. Both SB 60 and HB 252, castigated extensively right here, no longer appear on the House agenda. Not sure why, but I know that my influence, if any, is more of the reverse barometer type with the legislators, so there’s no cause & effect between what I wrote and their removal. Still, it’s encouraging.

Rep. J. J. Johnson’s HB 284, described right here yesterday, is on the agenda, and would seem like a ‘no-brainer’.

Also,  a bill sponsored mostly by the Middletown area below-the-canal delegation, HB 30, which would increase the ‘voluntary school assessment fee’ (isn’t that an oxymoron?) on developers to help pay for school construction costs, is on today’s agenda.

In other news…the Senate lives! There is actually one, count it, one, bill on today’s agenda. Rep. B. Short’s HB 202 is designed to protect policyholders in the event of any liquidation of a life and/or health insurance company. A  good bill, IMHO. Good thing we also have such an effective Insurance Commissioner to enforce th…ruh roh.

Pre-Game Show: State Legislative Committee Day-Wednesday, Jan. 13, 2010

First, a brief primer for newcomers. On Wednesdays when the General Assembly is in session, virtually the entire legislative day is devoted to committee meetings. For the House, other than ceremonial business, it is entirely devoted to committees. The Senate may conduct some business, but committee meetings usually are the main, if not sole, focus.

Since we are in the second year of the two-year legislative cycle, which begins and ends on Election Day, all of the legislation that was ‘in play’ at the conclusion of session last June remains in play.

And, of course, new bills can be introduced, some of which have already been discussed here at DL.

With the ground rules firmly laid out, let’s proceed to our Pre-Game Show.

There are some pretty darn interesting bills on House Committee agendas this week. In addition, some committees will be briefed by key state decision-makers. All committee meetings are open to the public. Here is the complete schedule of House Committee meetings this week. Once you connect to the link, you can just click on the location/time for the committee(s) that you’re interested in, and the agenda for the meeting will appear. Here’s what piqued my interest:

House Corrections Committee-HB 284 (Rep. J. Johnson)Would eliminate the ‘chilling effect’ on reporting rapes in prison by “…impos(ing) criminal liability solely on employees, visitors, contractors and volunteers at detention facilities. Prisoner-on-prisoner sexual assaults remain prosecutable pursuant to already existing criminal statutes.” Previously, and incomprehensibly, the victim of the assault was also deemed culpable.

House Education Committee-Dr. Lillian Lowery, Secretary of the Department of Education, updates the committee on Race to the Top and other educational initiatives.

House Health & Human Development Committee-DHSS Secretary Rita Landgraf will address the committee.

House Judiciary Committee-Now, here’s where we’ve got some interesting pieces of legislation, including:

House Bill 247 (Rep. Keeley)Seeks to streamline and strengthen consumer protection statute. This basically rewrites existing Delaware Code provisions in entirety. Will bear watching to make sure that the finished product matches the purported intent.

House Bill 302 (Rep. B. Short)Seeks  “to encourage the reporting of suspected financial exploitation of the elderly and infirm adults by providing immunity from criminal and civil liability for making such reports.” I support the intent of this bill, but just have one cautionary concern. Sometimes it is hard to tell the protective and greedy family members apart when families fight over who has the best interests of their elderly/infirm relatives at heart (as opposed to who gets to handle their assets). Sometimes, both parties are equally greedy and equally vindictive. I hope the bill doesn’t provide immunity for greedy relatives seeking to game the system by filing false reports against rival family members. It’s happened more than you might think.

Senate Bill 169 (Sen. Ennis)-I don’t recall reading or hearing about this bill passing the Senate, but it’s one that I suspect all the DL contributors might strongly support. SB 169 makes “obstructing ingress to or egress from a health care facility a Class B misdemeanor.” Reading the bill in its entirety here leaves no doubt as to its intentions. There were 3 ‘no’ votes in the Senate: Bonini, Simpson and (surprise, not) Venables. I told you that Bruce Ennis was a huge improvement over Jim Vaughn, and he is.  Hmm, I wonder how Monsignor Lavelle will vote on this one. Lotsa pro-choice people in his Brandywine Hundred district…

There are no Senate committee meetings scheduled. Really, I’m not sure why the Senate is even bothering to show up this week since, to date, they haven’t done anything.

Legislative Pre-Game Show-Jan. 12: Demagoguery On 1st Agenda of Session

What do you do if you’re a politician and you’ve got nothing but bad news to run on and you’re facing re-election?

Simple. Conjure up potential ‘horribles’, create simplistic legislation attacking said ‘horribles’, and run as if you bravely stood up to said ‘horribles’, even if what you did was simply to create horrible legislation to buttress your political bona fides.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Business as Usual in the Delaware General Assembly.

While the State Senate seems to have been taken completely by surprise by the first legislative session day of 2010, and has no published agenda nor list of meetings, the House, for better or worse, has an agenda, literally and figuratively. First, the literal agenda.

Two of these bills are demagoguery in bill form, aka the figurative agenda.

SB 60 (Sen. DeLuca/Rep. Mitchell)-This bill seeks to substitute the ‘judgment’ of the Delaware General Assembly over presumably namby-pamby judges and prosecutors when it comes to determining when bail should not be permitted. Probably b/c the General Assembly did such a great job when it established minimum mandatory sentences for non-violent drug offenders.

This bill would (read it yourself, I’m not making this up) enable the General Assembly to “… from time to time prescribe by law, when the proof is positive or the presumption great…those offenses which may not permit release on bail…in addition to capital murder.”

Got that? Capital murder charges are already non-bailable. But the General Assembly wants the opportunity to be the backseat driver when it comes to second-guessing the judges and prosecutors. If this passes, who will sponsor the bill to make sure that the pediatric pedophile is not eligible for parole? My guess? All 62 legislators. As if any judge or prosecutor would even consider letting that slime out on bail.

This is a bill about symbolism, not substance. Except that, as experience has taught us, no good comes from allowing the Honorables in Dover to interfere with the judicial process.

HB 252 (Rep. Lee/Sen. Bunting)-Here we go again. Yet another bill pretending to be tough on sexual offenders without distinguishing dangerous predators from those who pose no risk to society. This one would  “add parks and recreation areas to properties that a sexual offender shall not reside or loiter within 500 feet. Current law only limits residing or loitering by sexual offenders within 500 feet of school property.”

Presumably churches are exempt b/c the priest shortage would be exacerbated.

This is bad public policy. Dangerous sexual offenders should be kept away from the public. We can all agree on that, I hope. But to drive those who pose no threat and have paid their dues further and further from society serves no public purpose. In fact, it makes it more difficult for them to find and keep jobs, places them at greater risk of physical and mental conditions that likely would have to paid for out of Medicaid funds, and is simply punishment after the offender has already been punished and represents no further threat.

But it is good politics, especially in bad times. It’s something that everyone can put on their brochures: “I fought to keep dangerous sexual predators away from our children.”

With the Delaware General Assembly, some things never change.

Rep. Thornburg Also Retiring, According to Celia

This is also really big news from Celia Cohen. Rep. Pam Thornburg (R-Dover West) also announced her retirement at the same Caucus meeting where Bill Oberle announced his. She will become administrator of the Delaware Farm Bureau, a position from which she will no doubt lobby her former colleagues.

This is huge b/c Thornburg barely won reelection against Trey Paradee in 2008. In fact, the first count showed that Paradee had won, Thornburg congratulated him, but a recount showed that Thornburg had indeed prevailed.

If, as I urged here, Paradee has continued to maintain a visible profile in the district, this seat could likely flip to the D column in 2010. I would strongly encourage Paradee to get moving ASAP to discourage prospective R’s from even considering this race. The secret to winning on the second try is by continuing to run after losing the first time. That doesn’t necessarily mean doing door-to-door in the off year (although that really helps), but in appearing at events, community meetings and the like.

Trey, if you haven’t been doing this, then the clock starts now.  You are the de facto incumbent. Do what an incumbent would do, listen to and, as best as possible, represent your constituents. You’re welcome.

As I wrote in April, 2009, when I first profiled this district, the registration #’s are good, not great. Back then, they were 6938 D’s, 5567 R’s, and 4119 I’s. They are now 7192 D’s, 5687 R’s and 4302 I’s, marginally better D numbers, but certainly a highly-competitive district.

If Trey Paradee effectively preempts a Rethug challenger by working hard starting today, he wins. It’s that simple.

Otherwise, whether he runs or not, this will be a real (to borrow a Danny Ozark malapropism) cliff-dweller.  Your choice, Trey.

Two of El Somnambulo’s Top 10 targets down, eight to go…

Anita Van Sant: Rest In Peace

I was truly saddened to read of the passing of Anita Van Sant.

While the low-key obituary was typically self-effacing, Anita was one of the best political campaign managers I’ve ever met. She and her husband, former State Representative John F. Van Sant, were the perfect political team. As the candidate, John knew that his job was to campaign. He knew that Anita could and would handle everything else. In those rare instances when John might have crossed that line between candidate and campaign manager, Anita would remind him in no uncertain terms that she was running the campaign. Both of them had this wonderful trademark ‘Bickersons’ sense of humor, and you knew how much they loved each other at all times.  The two of them built a superb grassroots team in their district and, once Van Sant defeated Donald Van Sciver on his second try, there was no looking back.

Candidates and prospective candidates should learn from the Van Sants: You can either be the candidate or the campaign manager. You can’t be both.

Anita and John were also political rarities in that they truly always remembered their friends. They weren’t careerists looking at the next rung, they were community-based people who loved helping people. And, they were always very kind to me.

During my career with the state, the Van Sants, and Senators Bob Marshall and Harris McDowell proved to be those rare people who actually had your back when those you thought would have your back proved otherwise.

My deepest condolences to John and his family. As much as I’ll miss the humorous banter between John and Anita, I know that it will be especially missed by the family.

To those who never had the pleasure, all I can say is, you would’ve really liked Anita Van Sant.

A Preview Of Next Year’s Legislative Battles

Speaker Bob Gilligan spoke to the Progressive Democrats of Delaware last night to preview next year’s legislative battles. There are really two big issues we’ll see next year: the budget and the 2010 election.

Budget

Gilligan told us that they expect at least a $300M-$400M budget gap next year (that’s before the additional job losses in Delaware City were announced) and he said point blank that they are not going to raise taxes again. Therefore the budget gap is going to be closed by slashing programs. He didn’t know if state workers were going to take another hit, but he thought that they probably wouldn’t get their pay cut back next year. The state programs mentioned by Gilligan were the following:
– Medicaid – Gilligan discussed the “Missouri solution” which was to toughen Medicaid eligibility
– Universities – Gilligan said that three state universities were a lot for a state with a population of less than 1M people.
– SEED – Gilligan stated that the state now pays for 15 years of school: full day Kindergarten, grades 1-12 and 2 years of college at Del Tech.
– Parks – Gilligan stated that the state took over some of the city/county parks in the last decade which has added to the budget woes.

Gilligan stated that programs will be cut, and they may be popular programs. I expect to hear about a lot of unhappy people in the next legislative session. I believe this is where we’re going to see the most fireworks in the upcoming legislative session

2010 Election

It sounds like the House Democrats are going to focus on two big issues in next year’s races: streamlining running of the House and their legislative accomplishments. For the legislative accomplishments from last year he listed the following (incomplete):
– Changing the way the House was run. The Democratic majority cut the staff by a lot, the revoked extra holidays (the year before there had been 12 above and beyond the scheduled 21), removed privileges like free mailing (franking) and travel.
– Open government – Gilligan pointed out, rightly IMO, that this legislation died every year when the Republicans ran the House.
– Banned discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation
– Workplace Fraud Act
– Violent Crimes Compensation Board reform

Gilligan talked a lot about the atmosphere. Delaware Republicans are becoming the party of no, just like the national party. He said they gave absolutely no help to Markell in closing the budget gap, which in part was caused by their own actions. He doesn’t expect that to change in the coming legislative session.

Gilligan also dismissed calls for reform of the redistricting process. He basically said that if Democrats control the House, they are going to use the redistricting process to protect themselves (well, at least he’s honest). He also defended John Atkins, said that Atkins worked very hard and when push came to shove, he was there for the caucus.

I asked Gilligan next session’s HB1 would be. He didn’t really have an answer except that it sounds like the budget gaps will be priorities 1, 2 and 3 next year.

Sex Offender Registry: Good Politics=Bad Policy?

On Sunday, Read All About It In the Sunday Papers featured this as its lead story:

“LEAD STORY-The (UK) Economist: Unintended Consequences of Sex Offenders’ Laws?

It is easy for politicians to push for tougher laws on sexual offenders. It is even easier to demagogue against anyone who would dare suggest that, in many cases, there is more than a little nuance that is never taken into considerationMemo to all stupid people: There are tens of thousands of people on sex offenders registries all over the country from whom neanderthals like Saxby Chambliss does not have to  ”protect my grandchildren”. Saxby’s home state of Georgia has many of the cases that illustrate the unthinking nature of a ‘one size fits all’ policy:

Georgia has more than 17,000 registered sex offenders. Some are highly dangerous. But many are not. And it is fiendishly hard for anyone browsing the registry to tell the one from the other. The Georgia Sex Offender Registration Review Board, an official body, assessed a sample of offenders on the registry last year and concluded that 65% of them posed little threat. Another 30% were potentially threatening, and 5% were clearly dangerous. The board recommended that the first group be allowed to live and work wherever they liked. The second group could reasonably be barred from living or working in certain places, said the board, and the third group should be subject to tight restrictions and a lifetime of monitoring. A very small number “just over 100” are classified as “predators”, which means they have a compulsion to commit sex offences. When not in jail, predators must wear ankle bracelets that track where they are.

Despite the board’s findings, non-violent offenders remain listed and subject to a giant cobweb of controls. One rule, championed by Georgia’s House majority leader, banned them from living within 1,000 feet of a school bus stop. This proved unworkable. Thomas Brown, the sheriff of DeKalb county near Atlanta, mapped the bus stops in his patch and realised that he would have to evict all 490 of the sex offenders living there. Other than the bottom of a lake or the middle of a forest, there was hardly anywhere in Georgia for them to live legally. In the end Georgia’s courts stepped in and suspended the bus-stop rule, along with another barring sex offenders from volunteering in churches. But most other restrictions remain.

 Sex-offender registries are popular. Rape and child molestation are terrible crimes that can traumatise their victims for life. All parents want to protect their children from sexual predators, so politicians can nearly always win votes by promising curbs on them. Those who object can be called soft on child-molesters, a label most politicians would rather avoid. This creates a ratchet effect. Every lawmaker who wants to sound tough on sex offenders has to propose a law tougher than the one enacted by the last politician who wanted to sound tough on sex offenders.

This is a brilliant and thought-provoking article. It provides case studies in how the most draconian aspects of sex offenders law have destroyed people and families for no demonstrated public purpose. The article even lays out the costs of the most ill-considered aspects of these laws. Any legislator who takes their job seriously should really read this article before they do the knee-jerk thing next time. While strong laws protecting the public from sex offenders who represent a public threat are essential, draconian laws like those described in this article can empirically be shown to be counterproductive.” 

Today’s News-Journal  describes both the political attractiveness of pushing for tougher laws while also outlining some of the unintended (?) consequences of said policies. First, politicians are always angling to prove who’s ‘toughest on crime’:

In the first half of this legislative session alone, six bills dealing with sex offenders were introduced in the General Assembly, five of which have become law. One of those requires all offenders to register, while two increase penalties for various offenses.

 As (the ACLU’s Drew) Fennell put it, “I think it’s politically difficult for anyone to try to deal rationally with the very real public safety issues” surrounding sex offenders.

These are six new bills and five new laws over and above Delaware’s already-strong laws on sex offenders. It is not as if dangerous sexual predators are  running unchecked without these laws. It’s just that political demagogues (aka voter predators) run more effectively with these laws on their campaign lit and in their ‘newsletters’.  And for those who know that the new laws are BS and likely to be counterproductive, the path of least resistance encourages them to vote for these bills rather than having to explain something that takes more than a simple sound bite to their constituents.

And, make no mistake, ill-considered legislation like this can do and does real harm. From the Observer article:

Georgia has more than 17,000 registered sex offenders. Some are highly dangerous. But many are not. And it is fiendishly hard for anyone browsing the registry to tell the one from the other. The Georgia Sex Offender Registration Review Board concluded that 65% of those on the Registry posed little threat. Another 30% were potentially threatening, and 5% were clearly dangerous. The board recommended that the first group be allowed to live and work wherever they liked. The second group could reasonably be barred from living or working in certain places, said the board, and the third group should be subject to tight restrictions and a lifetime of monitoring. 

Despite the board’s findings, non-violent offenders remain listed and subject to a giant cobweb of controls. One rule, championed by Georgia’s House majority leader, banned them from living within 1,000 feet of a school bus stop. This proved unworkable. Thomas Brown, the sheriff of DeKalb county near Atlanta, mapped the bus stops in his patch and realised that he would have to evict all 490 of the sex offenders living there. Other than the bottom of a lake or the middle of a forest, there was hardly anywhere in Georgia for them to live legally. In the end Georgia’s courts stepped in and suspended the bus-stop rule, along with another barring sex offenders from volunteering in churches. But most other restrictions remain.

Greater access to the Delaware Sex Offenders Registry provides little additional useful information without some context. According to the News-Journal, “Like the old online registry, Delaware’s revamped site only shows offenders designated as moderate- and high-risk.” Fair enough as long as the public understands what defines ‘moderate’ for terms of the registry.

However, the different kinds of bans apply in many cases to all ‘offenders’, many of whom have never posed any kind of public threat.

Make no mistake: Dangerous sexual predators must be tracked and kept from placing the public at risk. However, that is no excuse for the General Assembly to enact a series of ever-more draconian laws when it has no demonstrated public benefit. 

The Beast Who Slumbers suspects that the ‘follow-the-demagogic-leader’ game that legislators all too often play will eventually lead to a rollback in ill-considered policy here. Much the same way that it has happened with the rolling back of minimum mandatory sentencing for non-violent drug offenders.

Like the minimum sentencing laws, it will only happen after years of unnecessary personal devastation courtesy of the ‘Honorables’ in Dover.

Live-Blogging the House-Vol. 2

Anyone wishing to catch up with El Somnambulo’s timeless prose from earlier today can link here.

When the House recessed for an arm-twisting session around 5:30, ‘bulo doubted that it would eventually turn into the dinner break. Apparently, ‘Bulo was wrong, not for the first time today, nor certainly for the last time tonight. Clearly, the last hurdles for finalizing the fiscal deals have not yet been cleared. At least two key bills, the tax on beer and alcohol (3/5 majority required), and the raising of administrative fees collected by the Secretary of State’s Office (2/3 majority) do not currently have the votes for passage. Unless an agreement can be reached on those two bills, either the Joint Finance Committee will have to find more cuts, or alternative revenues that can be passed must be found.

FWIW, the House D’s have reportedly been caucusing since 7 p.m. Could be arm-twisting, could simply be laying out what they plan to work/not work the rest of the night, could be both, could be neither. General Rule of Thumb: The longer the caucus, the tougher time they’re having resolving outstanding issues. An hour is not a long caucus. Just have to see how much longer it continues…

In the four hours since the House was scheduled to go into session, they have passed, let ‘bulo make sure his count is accurate, zero bills. Just a couple of ceremonial resolutions. That’s it. This will likely have the following two consequences as the evening progresses, and these both are based on what may be the faulty assumption that there will be few snags from fiscal package: (1) The session will almost inevitably run well past midnight and into the 2-4 pm range at best; and (2) There could be some institutional conflict with the Senate. Both of these eventualities are related. A lot of legislation gets passed on June 30/July 1, and that includes priority bills from all 62 legislators. The House hasn’t worked anything today. Pretty soon, Senate leadership is likely to threaten not to run House must-lists if the House doesn’t start running Senate must-lists. So even if the fiscal issues all get ironed out by midnight, there will be a raft of legislation awaiting action before recess.

Of course, it’s possible that House and Senate leadership is currently closeted in the Governor’s office, and/or the Joint Finance Committee is hastily reconvening. Either way, it’s shaping up to be a lo-o-ong night.

House is back. 8:42 pm. HS1/HB 267 is back off the table and before the House. This is the fees charged by the Secretary of State bill, and it’s a 2/3 bill. Sounds like they’re going right to roll call. Quick call for the roll call. So far all R’s no, Kowalko votes yes, Oberle votes yes. Cathcart, D. Short and Blakey switch to yes. Passed with the bare minimum. 28 Y.

Rep. Dennis P. Williams, Chair of the Joint Finance Committee, introduces House Joint Resolution 6, which sets the official estimate for state revenue for FY 2010, a prerequisite for consideration of the Budget Bill. Roll call likely to be unanimous.  And it is.

Rep. Dennis P. Williams introduces HJR 7, which sets the official General Fund revenue estimate for FY 2010. Passes unanimously. Budget Bill shouldn’t be far behind.

Rep. Williams requests action on House Bill 290, the State Operating Budget for FY 2010.  Ranking Republican Joe Booth is speaking. He intends to support the budget. Lavelle allowing his mouth to run again. Apparently he can’t read the newspaper and needs to understand the pay cut issue. Controller General Russ Larsen is explaining it in words hopefully even Greg can understand. Greg apparently wasn’t really interested in the answer, but loved hearing his dulcet tones reverberate throughout the Chamber. He was the only one. Rep. Marshall asks Ann Vasalli to also take the floor. Vasalli explains that case law indicates that judges are constitutionally exempt from mandated pay cuts. The judges are reportedly doing it voluntarily. Same with the Governor, who is voluntarily taking a 20% pay cut for FY 2010. Greg Lavelle is back on the floor saying that he’s voluntarily taking a 10% pay cut. He’s still overpaid. Rep Kovach calls for a House attorney. He asks for a constitutional opinion about the reduction of state legislators’ salaries, which is included in the bill. The response of the attorney, Bill Busch, is “The language speaks for itself” and is unconstitutional. Rep. Oberle points out that the only ones who have standing would be legislators, and he doesn’t think any legislator would file suit. Russ Larsen, Controller General, is back on the floor to clarify. Rep. Kovach says he’s not inclined to vote for the budget b/c of the constitutional issue. He says that it is a principled stand based on not voting to take action contrary to the Constitution. Roll call: 27 Y 14 N. The State Budget has passed the House!

They’re now passing a House Consent Agenda I allegedly full of non-controversial bills. You can find it here.

House now considering SB 173, designed to enable counties and municipalities to engage in energy efficiency projects, and further reforms the SEU process. Although Rep. Kowalko was listed as the floor manager, Rep. Gerald Brady managed the bill. Maybe means something, maybe not. Passed unanimously.