General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Weds., June 19, 2013

General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Weds., June 19, 2013

40 Comments
The Great Grubby Gold Rush of 2013 has begun. Millions for an Archmere mansion(?), $8 mill for racinos w/no strings attached(?), more $$'s down the aglands preservation rabbit hole(?), $2.2 mill to buy a Sussex hunting preserve(?). A disproportionate number of these requests for downstate projects. The News-Journal covers it here. And the racino $8 mill rationalizations here. Enjoy (or despair of) Bloviator Colin Bonini's contradictions within mere paragraphs of each other. Must be Bond Bill time. The idea of giving $8 mill to the racinos that were already given legal monopoly status with no licensing fees and slot machines video lotteries subsidized by the state is brain-dead. What other casinos in this country received such a sweetheart deal? As Al Mascitti pointed out on our show yesterday, it's not our fault that idiots at Dover Downs somehow decided that theirs would be a 'destination resort' that required hotels and restaurants. Nothing says destination resort quite like anonymous concrete strip malls and traffic lights every 20 feet. Why in hell should they get even a penny of bailout money? In this case, true to Markell form, this lame cash dump doesn't even require the racinos to forestall layoffs, which is just what they're threatening to do if they don't get relief. Markell is simply doubling-down on someone else's bad bet. With our money. Let's see...$8 mill earmarked for racinos, $7.5 mill pissed away on agland preservation, you could more than pay for a 1% increase for state employees with that money. Jack, Jack?
General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Tues., June 18, 2013

General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Tues., June 18, 2013

29 Comments
Conspiracy Theory of the Week: DSEA Sells Out Public Schools, Secures Raises for Teachers. If you were wondering why DSEA agreed to support charter schools' grubby grab of public cash earmarked for public schools, we may now have the answer. Included in the Governor's budget is "$8.5 million for 'step increases'  for  school employees, gradual pay raises teachers get as they gain experience and education", according to Monday's News-Journal article by Matthew Albright. Considering that the first $2 mill of the charter schools cash grab is also in the same budget bill, we can see how Markell bought off public education officials. Another $2.6 million is for 'state testing computers', yet more money down the rabbit hole of standardized testing. Need I remind anyone that we've got $8.5 mill for teachers' increases, $0.00 for state employee increases. While I'm fine with raises for teachers, Strongly supportive in fact, I'm not fine with the Deal with the Devil that enabled them. Ladies and gentlemen, your Democratic governor. And the purported protectors of public education. BTW, time for, IMHO, an important digression. Is it possible, just possible, that Jack Markell is campaigning...for CIA Chief? I'm (sorta) serious about this. The man who ran on the issue of government transparency has made secrecy the defining touchstone of his second term. First, the Port machinations. Then, the Charter Schools debacle, where his administration literally dared doubters to file a FOIA lawsuit. And, just this Sunday, an incredible piece by Jeff Montgomery in the News-Journal, which effectively lays out a strong case that Gov. Markell deliberately suppressed environmental data casting serious doubt on the environmental safety of the Delaware City oil refinery. Deliberately suppressed. Anybody getting angry yet? Meanwhile, SB 97(Henry) "adds the term “gender identity” to the already-existing list of prohibited practices of discrimination and hate crimes. As such, this Act would forbid discrimination against a person on the basis of gender identity in housing, employment, public works contracting, public accommodations, and insurance, and it would provide for increased punishment of a person who intentionally selects the victim of a crime because of the victim’s gender identity." SB 97 received the bare minimum 11 votes required to pass the Senate. I think it will likely have a more comfortable margin in the House.
General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Thurs., June 13, 2013

General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Thurs., June 13, 2013

28 Comments
Let me get this straight. Jack Markell cuts taxes for his wealthy friends early this session. The only tax among the so-called temporary emergency taxes enacted in 2009 that he cut. Now he says he needs $80 million in new taxes and fees, or bridges will fall down, highways will crumble. Oh, and if they do, it will be somebody else's fault because Markell gave the legislators a full 2 1/2 week's warning before the end of session. Maybe, just maybe, if he stopped appearing on TV, writing half-baked op-eds, or accepting ginned-up awards created solely to increase his national stature (I recommend lifts as an alternative), he might find time to, you know, actually govern. I mean in public, not in secret.
General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Tues., June 11, 2013

General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Tues., June 11, 2013

2 Comments
That was quite the eventful Senate session last Thursday. We can count to three, so let us count the ways (even though Legislative Council can only count to two; seriously somebody needs a wake-up call there): 1.  The Senate handily passed SS1/SB 33(Ennis), which would require owners/landlords of manufactured homes communities to justify rent increases above the Consumer Price Index. 17 yes, 1 no(Bloviator Bonini), 1 not voting (Pope Pompous I, formerly Monsignor Lavelle). Now don't get all excited. The Senate vote was viewed as a 'free vote' last session because the Forces of Evil had wired the House. It's getting late in session. Contact your state reps and urge them to move forward and pass this bill. First warning sign will be if this bill doesn't get placed in Paul Baumbach's Manufactured Housing Committee. 2. Although Legislative Council, the official 'information' arm of the Delaware General Assembly, took no note of it, the Senate passed landmark legislation which prohibits gender identity discrimination in Delaware. SB 97(Henry) passed the Senate by an 11-7 vote.  Interesting roll call. Cathy Cloutier was the only R to vote yes,  Dems Bob Venables and Bruce Ennis voted no,  D Brian Bushweller and R Pope Pompous I went not voting. All 11 yes votes were required for passage. If your senator did the right thing, thank them. And, if anybody's home at Leg Council, could you please update the session log? I know that there are some exciting new solitaire options on your computers, but perhaps one of you...? Pretty please? 3. The Senate passed 'redistricting reform' on a straight party line vote. SB 48 creates an 11-member commission to draw the lines and to make the process more open than it has been. Speaker of the House Pete Schwartzkopf has made it pretty clear that he likes the current 'behind closed doors' method of drawing the lines. There are quite a few House D's signed on as co-sponsors, so we'll see what happens. My guess? Schwartzkopf prevails, reform doesn't.
General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Thurs., June 6, 2013

General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Thurs., June 6, 2013

48 Comments
I knew, I just KNEW, that I was gonna like State Rep. Kim Williams. I had liked her votes, I had liked her positions during the campaign, and I loved her work on simplifying school choice for students and parents. But yesterday she demonstrated why she is an invaluable member of the Delaware General Assembly with this quote, courtesy of the News-Journal:
"Until recently, I was on the Red Clay School Board, and we were never informed of the specifics of this bill. I feel that we need to get more public input."
Or at least SOME public input.  The Markell Administration is pushing HB 165(Jaques) to the max. In fact, I think they tried to put one over even on the legislators who are sponsoring this bill. Rep. Earl Jaques made clear that this bill is not going to be rushed through:
"We have a bill in front of us, let's discuss this bill. The time for the public to get involved is now, while we're discussing this legislation."
Others on this blog have done a far better job of describing the issues raised by this bill than I ever could. What particularly galls me is that we don't even know officially where this bill came from. There was indeed a group created to review ways to improve charter schools. Hell, the list has been provided here. But, get this, even though Gov. Markell appointed the 24-member working group, he claims that this group had no real authority and, as such, public meetings were not required. So much for 'Governor Transparency'. That is one of the most disingenuous things I've heard out of this Administration, which is really saying something. Shades of the Port of Wilmington deal. But, I digress. HB 165 barely made it out of the House Education Committee, 7-6. It is far from ready for prime time. It is June 6. People are already on vacation, including teachers, students, and parents. There is no way that this bill should be worked by June 30. Let's just see what this Governor does...
General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Weds., June 5, 2013

General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Weds., June 5, 2013

34 Comments
SB 97(Henry), which would add 'gender identity' to the "already-existing list of prohibited practices of discrimination and hate crimes. As such, this Act would forbid discrimination against a person on the basis of gender identity in housing, employment, public works contracting, public accommodations, and insurance, and it would provide for increased punishment of a person who intentionally selects the victim of a crime because of the victim’s gender identity." In Senate Judiciary Committee.  The committee will also consider HB 88 As Amended(Barbieri), which attempts to keep weapons away from those who are dangerously mentally-ill. The bill passed the House with only one no vote. You can read a compelling narrative on behalf of SB 97 here. I can't hope to top that, and I won't. Except to say that the Senate has an agenda today. I don't find much of interest there, but feel free to rummage around.
Did Wilmington’s Mayor Try to Funnel $4 Million to Southbridge Church?

Did Wilmington’s Mayor Try to Funnel $4 Million to Southbridge Church?

28 Comments
On today's Al Mascitti Show on WDEL, featuring notable guest El Somnambulo, both a City Council member and  a city pastor alleged that the Williams Administration budgeted $4 million that would go to a Southbridge church to help build a gymnasium. According to both Wilmington Councilman Michael Brown and Reverend Derrick Johnson, the church in question is the church of City Councilman Justen Wright.
General Assembly Pre-Game Show: Tues., June 4, 2013

General Assembly Pre-Game Show: Tues., June 4, 2013

4 Comments
With the final budget details being worked out, the Delaware General Assembly begins its final sprint to the June 30/July 1 session finish line. At least one issue of note has arisen since the Memorial Day two-week recess--alleged unprofessional and dangerous conduct by at least one employee of Planned Parenthood.  You can bet that the Bob Venables' and Greg Lavelles of this world will use this to further their anti-choice agendas. You can expect tougher legislation regulating clinics as a result of the scandal surrounding Dr. Liveright (his real name?) and Planned Parenthood. And, as a Planned Parenthood supporter (financially as well as philosophically), such scrutiny is deserved. One of the most powerful arguments for availability of legal abortion services is that, without them, clients (and there will always be clients) will be forced to seek less safe alternatives. However, when you have Eric Harrah, Dr. Gosnell, and Dr. Liveright serving as cautionary examples, it is incumbent on legitimate providers to demand standards above the minimum of what the law will allow. Planned Parenthood knows their foes will use any pretext to go after them, which is why I really worry about why PP gave it to them. And, in so doing, placing their clients at risk.  Memo to PP and supporters: Don't bury your heads in the sand here, face the problem head-on.
General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Weds., May 15, 2013

General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Weds., May 15, 2013

7 Comments
Just two more days before the Memorial Day 2-week recess. Actually, during the two weeks, the Joint Finance Committee will meet to mark up the budget. Meaning, you'll hear a lot of bitching by Gov. Walker's Markell's budgeteers. The more bitching, the better the budget, IMHO. I especially look forward to their outrage should state employees (and don't forget us pensioners!) get raises. Governor, I've got three words for you: Tax your friends. Three more: Or shut up. Damn, that feels good. I gotta say it: The Delaware General Assembly has done a great job of pushing back at the NRA. And its pigeon-maiming front man. The House passed SB 16(Henry), which will help put an end to 'straw purchases' of firearms. The bill just squeaked through the Senate by an 11-10 vote, and the House passed it by a similarly-close 22-19 count. D's voting no: Atkins, Bennett, Carson, Mulrooney(?), Paradee, and Walker(?). R'(s) voting yes: Ramone(!). The bill heads to the Governor for his signature. Great work all around here! If I were a wounded pigeon in Pa., I'd be veryvery afraid right about now. John Sigler has even more blood in his eye than usual.

General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Tues., May 14, 2013

34 Comments
While we were busy celebrating the passage and signing into law of Delaware's Marriage Equality Act, the House effectively killed off legislation providing a modest hike in Delaware's minimum wage. Make no mistake: the killing of SB 6 was deliberate and planned, and the co-conspirators were all Democrats: Speaker Pete Schwartzkopf, Rep. Bryon Short, and Gov. Jack Markell. Here's how it happened. After bargaining in what he thought was good faith with Gov. Walker Markell, Sen. Robert Marshall agreed to amendments that significantly reduced the impact of SB 6. Specifically, he agreed to push back the effective date, to decouple subsequent rate increases from the rate of inflation, and to lower the amount of the increase. Markell praised the eviscerated finished product, and said he could support the bill. Which was the last 'support' he provided. And Speaker Pete got the memo loud and clear: Kill the bill! And he did. How? By assigning it to the House Business Lapdog Committee, aka the House Economic Development/Banking/Insurance/Commerce Committee, instead of to the House Labor Committee. Chaired by Rep. Bryon Short. You may recall that this is precisely the same tactic that former Speaker Bob Gilligan employed when Markell wanted him to kill the bill last session. And, for the second straight session, Short did not disappoint. SB 6 was passed in the Senate on March 21. It did not receive its hearing in the committee until May 8, and that was deliberate. Short allowed the bill to languish until the last day that, according to House rules, it had to be considered in committee. Many of you are aware of the full-court press opposition led by the respective Chambers of Commerce in the past two weeks. By delaying consideration of the bill, the committee chair enabled that campaign to have optimal effect. To the point where empty tabula rasas like Andria Bennett were reciting Chamber talking points verbatim in opposition to as Democratic a bill as you'll ever find. Gov. Markell demonstrated some slickness here. By saying that he would sign SB 6, he eliminates any political stigma that Democrats would attach to him in a future run for political office for publicly opposing a minimum wage increase. And he gets Pete and his DLC house cronies to kill the bill. Just like he did last year. Just remember, Markell's fingerprints are all over this. Cut'n save.

General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Tues., May 7, 2013

4 Comments
Damn! I feel like Cathy Cloutier circa 2011. Gotta miss today's vote. Off the radar screen, although I'll be checking in from the road. This time, I think that Cathy Cloutier will be in the building, and that she will vote yes. In fact, I predict that both she and Bethany Hall-Long will do the right thing, which means that HB 75 will get 12 votes, and that marriage equality will become reality in Delaware. It should be a great day in Dover. Chamber and the gallery packed. Matt Denn presiding over the Senate in case he might have to cast the deciding vote. A lot of pent-up emotion. Hopefully to be followed by a joyful catharsis. Sen. Blevins has cleared the decks by scheduling HB 75, and only HB 75, on today's Senate agenda.  You all know that Delaware Liberal is the place to go for continuing coverage of this historic debate. Maybe I'll even chime in from someplace in Bumf-ck, Indiana, assuming that the internets have reached there. [Delaware Dem note: I will be setting up a Debate and Vote thread this afternoon].

General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Thurs., May 2, 2013

18 Comments
The question of the day: 'Why Tuesday, Why Not Today?' Why is HB 75 (Marriage Equality), which cleared the Senate Executive Committee yesterday, not being worked today? The questions, and my highly-speculative answer are herein reprinted in their entirety:
Dale: Does anyone have any insight as to why the Senate vote on HB 75 was scheduled for next Tuesday, a full week (not actually) after the committee vote?
El Somnambulo thought that it might be scheduled for the very next day. And I read on the site of the conservative DE Family Policy Council that they thought the same thing. Why put it off a week? Could this mean that the 2 “undecided” senators are not simply keeping their intentions under wraps, but instead might genuinely be undecided and need more time? Is Hall Long requesting the extra time so that she can “poll” her district, as the News Journal reported?
El Somnambulo: Good questions, Dale. Blevins knows what she’s doing here, and your speculation could well be accurate. If she thinks that they need a little room to come to grips with their decisions, then I think that’s the right thing to do. There might, repeat, MIGHT, even be an Alphonse/Gaston situation here. What if two senators are reluctant to be the ‘deciding’ vote on an issue, but would each conceivably be ‘yes’ votes if theirs was the 12th rather than the 11th vote? That way, they’d have cover that their vote in essence made no difference. Seems crazy, I know, but stranger things have happened. I know that this issue is a ‘no-brainer’ for a lot of us, but there’s lots more at play than meets the eye with some legislators. I DO know that HB 75 has a superb grassroots lobbying effort behind it, so I don’t think we’ll lose ground between now and next Tuesday. Might just gain some.
Anyone have anything to add? Keep in mind that the goal of supporters should be to help these senators get to 'yes'.