Tag Archives: Media

Read All About It in the Sunday Papers-March 29 Edition

LEAD STORY-NEW YORK TIMES: Governor, Legislature Agree to Tax the Wealthy to Close Budget Gap

This should be must-reading for Gov. Markell and the General Assembly:

The new plan, which would expire after three years, would represent the largest state income tax increase in recent history, significantly larger than the surcharges imposed from 2003 to 2005, when the state last faced a major recession.

The plan would raise $4 billion a year by creating two new tax brackets, the highest one affecting those who earn $500,000 or more. If approved by rank-and-file lawmakers in the Assembly and State Senate, the tax increases would be a major victory for unions and liberal advocacy groups and a signal of the new balance of power in Albany, where Democrats won control of both houses of the Legislature and the governor’s office in last year’s election.

Although the proposed tax has been called a “millionaires’ tax,” it would affect those with incomes starting at $300,000, who would be taxed at a rate of 7.85 percent. The highest bracket would carry a tax rate of 8.97 percent — the same as New Jersey’s current highest rate.

Hmmm, see the similarity? Democrats now control both houses of the Delaware General Assembly. It only stands to reason that a progressive governor would want to restore progressivity to the Personal Income Tax in Delaware.

BOSTON GLOBE:  Boston College Cancels Appearance by William Ayers

Last minute cancellation, here’s the explanation, if you can call it that:

A spokesman for Boston College issued a brief statement yesterday, referring to the cancellation as an “internal matter at a private university.”

“After extensive discussions between student organizers and university administrators, a decision was reached to cancel the event,” BC spokesman Jack Dunn said in a statement. “In light of additional information that was shared with the students on the actions of the Weather Underground, including their alleged involvement in the killing of a Boston Police officer in nearby Allston, and out of concern for the safety and well being of our students, we believe that the appropriate decision was reached.”

One of the event organizers has a different perspective:

“One of his (Ayers’) big ideas is of educating the whole child, which is sneakily similar to the Jesuit idea cura personalis, which is care for the whole person,” said Roberts. “So we saw the obvious similarities here, and that’s why we invited Ayers to speak.”

Ayers is a professor, and recognized urban policy expert, at UIC. BC has uninvited a professor. The organizers, however, will take the event off-campus. Aren’t Jesuits supposed to be fairly enlightened?

BELLINGHAM (WA) HERALD: National Parks Developing Solutions to Reduce Carbon Footprints

Excellent article heralding the wave of the future. Plenty of ideas that might be incorporated locally as well. No word yet on how Rush Limbaugh intends to ‘celebrate’ these steps forward. Maybe you can come up with some ideas. No doubt ‘a price’s’ includes beans and farting, but that wouldn’t be much of a change for Rush.

SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE: Secular Pro-Business Mayor Just What Jerusalem Needs?

Nir Barkat seems like the kind of person who might be able to bridge some of the huge religious schisms in Israel. But first, he’s trying to bring Jerusalem into the 21st Century. Or, at least, the 20th.

ASIA TIMES: Disgraced Neo-Cons Don’t Fade Away, They Just Form New Think Tanks

The usual suspects. William Kristol, Robert Kagan, Dan Senor. And, of course, the first keynote speaker: John McCain. Keep an eye on these guys. They’ve proven how dangerous and wrong-headed they can be.

The Flatlining of Dead Tree News

Newspapers falling like dominoes seems to be one of the themes of the year, not unlike the 2 or so banks per week handed over the the FDIC.  It never seems quite real until one thing just crystallizes it all.

And this is it. Just go see what squeezing every last dollar out of a once awfully good paper looks like.

Apocalypse Nigh

One of my daily reads is George Parker’s AdScam/The Horror! If a blogger could be considered no holds barred, it would be Parker. Even though I am not involved in advertising, Parker’s rants are occasionally humorous, always laced with profanity and often instructive.

Take for instance yesterday’s post, Kudos to Bob Garfield. Parker writes:

Yes, I have taken the piss out of Bob in the past, but you have to take your hat off to him occasionaly, not just for being around longer than the dirt in my back yard, but for frequently hitting the nail firmly on the head.

Parker goes on to tell us to read Bob Garfield’s article, Future May Be Brighter, but It’s Apocalypse Now, in AdvertisingAge.

His piece in this weeks AdAge, titled “Future may be brighter, but it’s Apocalypse now,” should be required reading for every douchenozzle currently running any piece of a floundering media company

[snip]

Read the parable of the 14 year old who can create a global television network with applications that are built into her laptop, to get a grasp of how fucked traditional media, and the fucking dinosaurs who run it are. I insist that all AdScammer’s read this piece. Now, damn it, now!

Apologies to the reader as we have taken a small detour prior to getting to actual point to of this post, Garfield’s piece which details how fucked the institutions of media and marketing are.

Chicken Little, don your hardhat. Nudged by recession, doom has arrived.

[snip]

The sky is falling, the frog in the pot has come to a boil and, oh yeah, we are, most of us, exquisitely, irretrievably fucked.

Garfield dissects the financial troubles of newspapers, magazines, broadcast stations, TV networks, cable and, yes, online publishers. Yes, if you are a traditional media giant, apocalypse is nigh, the fat lady is no longer singing, she has  sung and left the building.

Garfield sums up the issue nicely in his Newspaper section:

The audience doesn’t imagine that all cars want to be free, or that all toasters want to be free, or that all paper towels want to be free, but it somehow believes that all content wants to be free.

So, in the words of Parker, don’t be a douchenozzle, go and read Garfield’s article now.

Senator Proposes Bill to Enable Newspapers to Be Run as ‘Not-For Profits’

An intriguing proposal from U. S. Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland. This would not in any way help the giant media conglomorates, but it appears that this might help local newspapers survive and, maybe eventually, thrive.

Cardin introduced a bill that would allow newspapers to choose tax-exempt status. They would no longer be able to make political endorsements, but could report on all issues including political campaigns.

Advertising and subscription revenue would be tax-exempt, and contributions to support coverage could be tax deductible.

Cardin said in a statement that the bill is aimed at preserving local newspapers, not large newspaper conglomerates.

“We are losing our newspaper industry,” said Cardin. “The economy has caused an immediate problem, but the business model for newspapers, based on circulation and advertising revenue, is broken, and that is a real tragedy for communities across the nation and for our democracy.”

On the surface, this appears to make sense to the Beast Who Slumbers. Of course, maybe if Congress had withstood Newt Gingrich’s push to enable newspaper owners to own TV stations and vice versa, which paved the way for Murdoch, among others, this wouldn’t have been necessary.

Fortunately, this blog has some serious students of newspapers who comment here. So, to anon, Geezer, and everybody else, whaddayathink?

And, decoupled from Gannett (if that’s possible), could this be a model that could lead to the renaissance of the News-Journal?

THREAD UPDATE: FROM WDEL’S ALLAN LOUDELL:

“I’ll be interviewing Senator Cardin on-the-air about this tomorrow (Wednesday) at about 12:15 p.m. during the “WDEL Delaware News at Noon”.

Thanks, Allan. ‘Bulo will be listening.

Good News/Bad News?: Tweety Re-ups w/MSNBC for 4 Years

Arlen Specter can presumably breathe easier. Chris ‘Tweetybird’ Matthews has signed an extension w/MSNBC that will keep him there until after the 2012 elections.

Matthews denies that he was raising the specter (too easy, ‘bulo knows) of a possible race as a bargaining ploy:

Mr. Matthews said that he had been serious about the Senate seat, now held by Arlen Specter, a Republican, and took umbrage at any suggestion that he might have been using the idea as negotiating leverage.

“I think it’s unfair people think like that,” Mr. Matthews said. “That’s sacrilegious.”

He said he had held a lifelong love affair with the Senate. “I grew up reading ‘Advise and Consent.’  (Well, it was a long book.)

“I would go to Washington on high school trips with the band and I would see senators just like in ‘Advise and Consent.’ Humphrey, Dirksen, Goldwater.” He added, “To be a senator was the greatest thing in the world.”

So, whaddayathink? Would you rather have seen Matthews run for the Senate? Would you prefer to see someone else in his place on MSNBC? Does he need to switch to Decaf? Inquiring minds want to know.

Read All About It in the Sunday Papers-March 22 Edition

LEAD STORY: Philadelphia Inquirer: HOW THE FEDS GOT FUMO.

Somebody’s got to say it. There is not a newspaper in the country doing better investigative work than the Philadelphia Inquirer. Today’s ‘howtheydunit’ is a definitive analysis of how the best the Federal government has working for them can take down even the most powerful lowlife. While it’s not an investigative report per se (the federal agents did the sleuthing), it tells a very complex tale in an easy-to-understand manner. If you think that’s easy to do, try it sometime. 

Boston Globe: Lessons for Delaware? Mass. Tackles State Pension Reform.

This article raised a question or two in ‘bulo’s coconut. Can a state legislator who has another state job, largely b/c the legislator IS  a legislator (*cough* Tony DeLuca *cough*, and about 10 others), be building two full state pensions at the same time? ‘Bulo suspects the answer is ‘yes’, which should be changed to ‘no’. Plus, shouldn’t something be done to discourage early retirees with full state pensions (usually the State Police) who then step into legislative careers or other low-stress second pension sources? At least make sure that it isn’t a full legislative pension.

Chicago Tribune: Southern States Want to Promote Tourism Through Confederate History Month.

They claim it’s just like Black History Month. Only without, you know, blacks. ‘Bulo thinks he knows a bad idea, badly promoted, when he sees it.

Christian Science Monitor: Alexander-Mania Sweeps Macedonia. Neighbors: We’re Getting Screwed, Greek-Style.

Make up names for the rides at the Alexander the Great Theme Park and Curio Emporium.

Dallas Morning News: Texas to Tackle CO2 Emissions.

No, they’re not gonna put little recapture devices on cows’ butts (You people are so ignorant). And, no they’re not calling it global warning (Those people are so stubborn). But Texas appears ready to jump before they are pushed by the EPA. ‘Bulo’s favorite?: “Their aims range from capping the state’s CO2 emissions to positioning Texas to become, as some put it, the Saudi Arabia of carbon disposal.

Despite The Beast Who Slumbers’ irreverence (he once headlined a rasslin’PPV called ‘Brazen on the Brazos’, you should’ve seen his perfectly-rippled musculature back then), there’s some damn good stuff in this article. For example, ‘Bulo did not realize that Texas is the nation’s leader in clean windpower. Now he does. Read the whole thing, it’s good.

McClatchy Newspapers: Medical Marijuana Debate Over. States Won.

Will Markell attend Marleyfest this year? Seriously, this could be a modest revenue enhancer. Not that ‘bulo cares either way…although he might be able to provide some technical assistance.

NYTimes: Are Rich Schools Getting Disproportionately Richer from Education Stimulus Funds?

Sure would be nice to see some way to equalize out the seemingly-random nature of who gets the money.

San Francisco Chronicle: Governator Considering Run to Terminate Sen. Boxer?

What would Sunday morning be w/o a little Political Hot Stove Talk?

Update:  Donviti add’s this to the fold:  Another FRANK RICH That you MUST READ TODAY

Inconvenient GITMO Truths

Yes, ‘bulo knows, everybody is bored with Iraq/Afghanistan/GITMO. Just like everybody is bored with the criminal behavior of the Bush Administration (Although said boredom doesn’t extend to the slugs in the press who are outraged that Robert Gibbs didn’t treat Dick Cheney with respect. Perhaps, if their outrage had included revealing the multitude of criminal endeavors emanating from Cheney’s office while Cheney was in office, in other words doing their jobs, the national press would be accorded more respect than, say, Dick Cheney.) But The Beast Who Slumbers digresses.

GITMO was and is bad. Very bad. Yes, the wingnuts will scream about how they’d rather be safe than sorry. And that might even hold some plausibility when and if the nature of the detainees is in doubt. However, this article by Lawrence Wilkerson lays out how that wasn’t even close to being the case with the detainees sent to Guantanamo. Even if you’re bored with these issues, please read the entire article.

Here is the crux of Wilkerson’s piece:

Simply stated, no meaningful attempt at discrimination was made in-country by competent officials, civilian or military, as to who we were transporting to Cuba for detention and interrogation.

This was a factor of having too few troops in the combat zone, of the troops and civilians who were there having too few people trained and skilled in such vetting, and of the incredible pressure coming down from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and others to “just get the bastards to the interrogators”.

It did not help that poor U.S. policies such as bounty-hunting, a weak understanding of cultural tendencies, and an utter disregard for the fundamentals of jurisprudence prevailed as well (no blame in the latter realm should accrue to combat soldiers as this it not their bailiwick anyway).

The second dimension that is largely unreported is that several in the U.S. leadership became aware of this lack of proper vetting very early on and, thus, of the reality that many of the detainees were innocent of any substantial wrongdoing, had little intelligence value, and should be immediately released.

But to have admitted this reality would have been a black mark on their leadership from virtually day one of the so-called Global War on Terror and these leaders already had black marks enough: the dead in a field in Pennsylvania, in the ashes of the Pentagon, and in the ruins of the World Trade Towers. They were not about to admit to their further errors at Guantanamo Bay. Better to claim that everyone there was a hardcore terrorist, was of enduring intelligence value, and would return to jihad if released. I am very sorry to say that I believe there were uniformed military who aided and abetted these falsehoods, even at the highest levels of our armed forces.

This really only scratches the surface of Wilkerson’s article. If you read the entire thing (it’ll only take about 10 minutes of your life at most), you will have a pretty good understanding of just how twisted and screwed-up not only GITMO was, but also the twisted contortions now being used by Dick Cheney to somehow blame the Obama Administration for problems going forward.

The 4th Estate that is apoplectic about Gibbs’ dissing of Cheney, as a group, allowed this kind of black box operation to continue unabated.  Their misplaced priorities (as can now be seen in their group effort to discourage Congress and the Department of Justice from investigating and possibly prosecuting Bush officials for misdeeds, misdeeds that largely flew under the radar due to journalistic deference) are one of the reasons that the corporate news media is in disrepute. But again, ‘bulo digresses.

Just read the damn article, and then get back here to praise it or to lambaste the Beast Who Slumbers by pointing out any fallacies in Wilkerson’s or ‘bulo’s logic.

Read All About It in the Sunday Papers-March 15 Edition

LEAD STORY: EPA TO SHUT DOWN SHAM BUSH PROGRAM ON VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE   -Philadelphia Inquirer

Proof that investigative journalism can still work. The Inky uncovered just what a sham (and environmental threat) the so-called ‘Performance Track’ program was:

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration intends to close an EPA program heavily promoted by the Bush administration that rewards voluntary pollution controls by hundreds of corporations with reduced environmental inspections and less stringent regulation, according to EPA sources and internal e-mails.

EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson is expected to sign, as early as this week, a memo terminating the Performance Track program, senior EPA officials said yesterday.

Performance Track offers regulatory perks to corporations that pledge to save energy and reduce pollution. Entry into Performance Track, EPA’s premier voluntary “green club,” is supposed to be reserved for companies with sterling environmental records, but has been denounced by environmentalists as a public-relations charade.

EPA’s decision comes three months after an Inquirer investigation found that Performance Track lauded companies with suspect environmental records, spent millions on recruiting and publicity, and failed to confirm members’ environmental pledges independently. The program became so desperate for new members, The Inquirer found, that it turned to gift shops and post offices to pad its numbers.

A senior EPA official said in an interview yesterday that The Inquirer’s findings had played a role in Jackson’s decision.

The Inquirer’s investigation of Performance Track was made public in December in a four-part series on the Bush administration’s subversion of the EPA, the federal agency charged with safeguarding human health and the environment.

The Inquirer found that the Bush administration’s antiregulatory bent had driven down funding, regulation, and employee morale as senior political appointees censored the agency’s scientific findings in ways that consistently benefited corporations.

A tip of the Somnambulo Sombrero to the Philadelphia Inquirer. Read the entire article, and then go back and read the entire investigative series. It will, at first, make you sick. But then you’ll remember that elections really matter, and so does an effective free press. 

AIG to Pay Out More Millions in Bonuses -Washington Post

Anywhere from $165 mill to $450 mill. Nationalize the bastards, tell ’em that if they can’t live without the bonuses, they’ll have to live w/o their jobs, and be done with it.

Drill, Baby, Drill No More -NYTimes

No, not the Obama policy, the free market at work to ensure higher prices at the pump.

Col. Sanders and KFC to End Cubs’ Futility? -Chi. Sun-Times

Can statue of the bearded one (no, the OTHER bearded one) end the curse of the billy-goat?

Conservative Radio Talk Drying Up in California -LATimes

As goes California, so goes Delaware?

Legislation Will Help Schools Teach Financial Literacy -McClatchy

Could this be the beginning of the end of the credit card industry as we know it?

Right-Wing ‘Dirty Bomber’ Killed in Maine-Media Ignores

If you were reading the mainstream media, you would have missed this.

A Nazi-sympathizer and white supremacist, distraught over the election of Barack Obama, purchased ‘depleted uranium’ over the ‘net (!?).

According to the dispatch from ‘Raw Story’, trust-fund millionaire James Cummings had the resources to construct a ‘dirty bomb’ and had been in contact with white supremacist organizations:

“According to an FBI field intelligence report from the Washington Regional Threat and Analysis Center posted online by WikiLeaks, an organization that posts leaked documents, an investigation into the case revealed that radioactive materials were removed from Cummings’ home after his shooting death on Dec. 9,” reported the Bangor Daily News.

“Amber (Cummings) indicated James was very upset with Barack Obama being elected President,” reported the Washington Regional Threat and Analysis Center (PDF link). “She indicated James had been in contact with ‘white supremacist group(s).’ Amber also indicated James mixed chemicals in the kitchen sink at their residence and had mentioned ‘dirty bombs.'”

“Also found was literature on how to build ‘dirty bombs’ and information about cesium-137, strontium-90 and cobalt-60, radioactive materials,” said theBangor Daily. “The FBI report also stated there was evidence linking James Cummings to white supremacist groups. This would seem to confirm observations by local tradesmen who worked at the Cummings home that he was an ardent admirer of Adolf Hitler and had a collection of Nazi memorabilia around the house, including a prominently displayed flag with swastika. Cummings claimed to have pieces of Hitler’s personal silverware and place settings, painter Mike Robbins said a few days after the shooting.”

He was killed by his wife before he could do further damage. In December. 

Will some of the media apologists who occasionally visit this site please explain to El Somnambulo why this story has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media, both print and electronic? Are white supremacists building ‘dirty bombs’ with the possible intent to kill the President not newsworthy? Is this such a commonplace occurrence that it is considered ‘dog-bites-man’? Would the media apply the same standard to, say ‘the shoe bomber’, anyone with an Islamic surname, or to a left-wing whacko engaged in this kind of behavior?

Simply put, can someone with any understanding of journalism please explain why this story has been ignored everywhere except in the local Bangor paper?

Is anybody with a functioning brain awake at editors’ desks across the country? Or has editing been contracted out to Swedish chimps as a cost-saving measure?

AOL News Hates Atheists

From that oh-so-illustrious news source, AOL News, comes an article about how “some” African-American Christians are upset at Obama’s inaugural speech reaching out to “non-believers” as well as Hindus, Muslims, etc:

By mentioning, for the first time in an inaugural address, the 16.1 percent of Americans who check “no”’ when asked about religion, Obama turned it into the most controversial line in his speech — praised by The New York Times editorial board and cited by some Christians as evidence that he is a heretic, and in his well-spoken way, a serious threat.
With that one line, the president “seems to be trying to redefine American culture, which is distinctively Christian,” said’ Bishop E.W. Jackson of the Exodus Faith Ministries in Chesapeake, Va. “The overwhelming majority of Americans identify as Christians, and what disturbs me is that he seems to be trying to redefine who we are.’”

News flash! “Some” African-American Christians can be just as religiously intolerant as “some” white Christians! AOL News has just discovered not all black people think and act alike! Shocking!

Now keep in mind that there are more atheists in America than there ever were AOL subscribers. This is classic Fox News-style journalism: Find someone who’s saying what you want people to hear, and “report” that they said it. It’s a win-win situation for the conservative media – they manage to attack atheists (and Hindus and Muslims) while making black people look like bigots. Never mind the fact that these criticisms are coming from a small minority of the African-American Christian community, or that AOL’s poll attached to the article shows that 74% of its increasingly conservative readers have no problem with Obama’s inclusion in the speech. They need a controversy, and if none exists, they’ll make one. This is exactly the same plan as when the networks spotlighted the several dozen people referring to themselves as “PUMAs” during the Democratic Convention.

Say the right words, and you magically become the most important constituency in the country. Notice that the media completely ignores the existence of bloggers until a few prominent ones criticize something Obama does or says – like when Clinton was picked for Secretary of State. Then, suddenly, the media starts printing stories about how bloggers are angry, and quoting Matt Stoller and Chris Bowers as if they represented all of us. You watch how many columns these journalists print warning Obama that “post-partisanship” means that he needs to distance himself from the blogosphere. They want a fight – that’s what sells the news.

Anyway, back to the subject.

Jackson said he and others have no problem acknowledging that “this country is one in which everybody has the freedom to think what they want.’” Yet Obama crossed the line, in his view, in suggesting that all faiths (and none) were different roads to the same destination: “He made similar remarks in the campaign, and said, ‘We are no longer a Christian nation, if we ever were. We are a Jewish, Hindu and non-believing nation.'”
Not so, Jackson says: “Obviously, Jewish heritage is very much a part of Christianity; the Jewish Bible is part of our Bible. But Hindu, Muslim, and nonbelievers? I don’t think so. We are not a Muslim nation or a nonbelieving nation.”’

If you’re not going to include Hindus, Muslims, and atheists in your definition of America, Bishop Jackson, you can leave my people out of it, too. We know what the end result of religious xenophobia always is, century after century.