UPDATE II: The Over/Under on the 14th Special

Filed in National by on November 1, 2007

The over/under for Ennis is 57%

Leave your prediction in the comments.

The closest to the actual results will receive a free copy of “The Complete Idiots Guide to Middle East Conflict” by Mitchell G. Bard Ph.D. (A $18.95 value!!)
Good luck.

————————————————————————–

Smyrnadudette:  Ennis 65%

Disbelief: Ennis 63%

George: Ennis 62%

Liberalgeek: Ennis 61%

MHomewood: Ennis 55%

Dana Garrett:  Ennis 53%

Goblin: ennis 49%

About the Author ()

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

Comments (32)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. disbelief says:

    Does Dave suffer from Ennis Envy?

  2. liberalgeek says:

    I’ll take the over at 61%.

  3. Dave says:

    Under.

    What’s there to envy, Doc?

  4. disbelief says:

    I’m for Ennis, 60/40.

    Does the book prize come signed by author?

  5. liberalgeek says:

    The problem with the book is that for the past 7 years we have, in fact, had a complete idiot guiding us into Middle-east conflict.

  6. disbelief says:

    Yeah, but #5, Dave has supported Bush and the Middle East conflict. Wait a minute.

    Nevermind.

  7. Dave says:

    Dis, I can’t decide whether you have a greater obsession with me or with Dimwitty.

  8. disbelief says:

    I’m sorry Dave, did you say something about how anonymous posts disgust you?

    You wouldn’t, perchance, happen to know who ‘allover’ is on the Smyrna-Clayton blog, now would you?

  9. George says:

    I’d say Ennis takes it at 62%

  10. Dave says:

    I have no idea, Doc.

  11. disbelief says:

    It appears that the group blog who worked with Buzzbait in running the Still/Schaeffer GOP team out of Smyrna has been seriously pissed off by someone called “allover”, and will be out to vote for Bruce Ennis in force.

    I’m changing my prediction to Bruce Ennis at 63%.

  12. Goblin says:

    I haven’t seen this many people back a loser and predict a victory since Kerry!

    Ennis has been hiding because if anyone sees him, he loses their vote. He has missed many public meetings and is hoping to ride party loyalty to the senate.

    He is mistaken. Delaware changed while he wasn’t paying attention in the last 26 years. No more time card punchers. The era of “it’s his/her turn” is OVER.

    NO SOUP FOR YOU!!!

    NEXT!!!!!!!!!!!!

  13. smyrnadudette says:

    Sorry Dis:
    I gotta take Ennis at 65%!!!!!

  14. Dana Garrett says:

    I hope to God I’m wrong and Christian wins, but I’m guessing Ennis at 53%.

  15. smyrnadudette says:

    Geez Dana: Are you backpedaling????

  16. Disbelief says:

    No, dana just wants to win the book

  17. Dana Garrett says:

    “Geez Dana: Are you backpedaling????”

    Pardon? I want her to win. If I were in the district, I would vote for her. I have done what I can on my blog and the blogosphere and on e-mail and on the radio to endorse her. But I realize that the Dems have a huge lead in registration and Ennis’ name is more familiar than hers in the district. I’m thinking she will do better, far better than expected.

    Now how is any of that backpedaling?

  18. Dana Garrett says:

    “dana just wants to win the book”

    Yes, indeed. I love contests.

  19. Anon says:

    Dave,
    Forgive me, but who is the gentleman in the black and white picture box to the right of your posts?

  20. mhomewood says:

    under at 55%…Now send me by book!

  21. jason330 says:

    Goblin, Thanks for the comment. I have you down for the “under” with Ennis at 49%.

    Also, thanks for showing your partisan colors. The Republican ability to deny reality never ceases to amaze me.

    Just when I start think my fellow Delawaeeans are more or less sane, I get these little reminders that 12% of us think Bush is doing a great job and that Kerry was a loser in comparison.

  22. Dave says:

    Dis – I checked out what you’re talking about. That isn’t me, but they sure think it is, and whoever’s doing it isn’t denying it, which kind of ticks me off. That said, two things.

    1. What that allover says is pretty much the case, and it sounds like he/she is not out of bounds, just unwelcome.

    2. When you say they’re going to vote “in force,” will they be voting more than once? Were they planning on staying home if they weren’t provoked?

  23. Dave says:

    Anon – the person in the picture next to my posts is the late US Senator John J. Williams from Millsboro, often referred to during his era as “The Conscience of the Senate.”

  24. jason330 says:

    I take “in force” to mean in the style of Michael Jackson’s “Beat it” video.

    I keep my jacket with 30 zippers on it handy for such occasions.

  25. disbelief says:

    I will ‘bust a move’ at the polls.

  26. disbelief says:

    This just in: Christian is betting Vaughn at 67%

  27. RickJ says:

    “The problem with the book is that for the past 7 years we have, in fact, had a complete idiot guiding us into Middle-east conflict.”

    The other problem with the book is that the Smyrna Public Library has been asking for it back for some time now. Included with this prize is $32.65 in fines…

  28. liberalgeek says:

    Comment of the day, Rick.

  29. You wouldn’t, perchance, happen to know who ‘allover’ is on the Smyrna-Clayton blog, now would you?
    *_
    there is an anony on a recent delawareonline thread (Ron Williams) who uses the Burris sign-off’ Thanks for playing”.

    Under the Burris-Smitty Protack Doctrine, this makes it a lock that the anony is Burris. Logical assumptions become fact, no?

  30. Fralump says:

    Sorry Nance!

    There’s a new cowboy in town.

    I’m not allover.

    I’m not Dave.

    I’m not telling.

    I’m just someone who wants to turn out deadbeats like Ennis.

    I’m just someone who wants to serve notice to the walking politically embalmed of Delaware.

    Never vote party.

    The trouble with you is that you don’t see the change coming.

    You will be UN-assimilated!

  31. RickJ says:

    “Comment of the day, Rick.”

    What do I win?

  32. Arthur Downs says:

    This is a strange race in that the biggest issue is philisophical, the would-be citizen-legislator against the time-serving professional who has made the right connections.

    Those whose motivation for political activism is purely venal have been running New Castle County for a long time.

    There are others who see a race in the context of irrelevant issues that have nothing to do with the office being sought.

    Politics is too important to leave it to the professionals.