Bailout Nation — the Latest Deal

Filed in National by on September 28, 2008

So after John McCain went to DC last week to collect his credit for the prior deal (and certainly without having one of his own), the news today is that there is apparently a new framework for a new bailout deal:

  • The total is still $700 billion, but is structured to allocate in 3 phases — $300 billion now, $100 billion at the President’s discretion, $350 billion only with Congressional approval;
  • Institutions selling assets to the government have to issue warrants, providing taxpayers an asset stake as a way to get back some of the bailout funds;
  • They expanded the pool of institutions who could participate, including small banks, pension funds, local governments
  • Executive Golden Parachutes are cut for institutions that get bailout funds;
  • An oversight board is created and that board has some accountability to and oversight by Congress;
  • Judicial review is preserved;
  • Private insurance funded by the banks to insure MBS;
  • The Government would somehow renegotiate bad mortgages that it owns either directly of via the securities.

Krugman weighs in and says Meh. It is what he expected and hope that it can be fixed next year.

As for me, this looks much like the plan last Thursday with the addition of the insurance scheme. I think that the Executive Compensation stuff makes people feel good, but I’d bet turns out not to survive judicial challenge. The insurance for these securities seems like the beginning of the next Ponzi scheme and still wish that everyone had walked away and ramped up serious hearings on this perhaps even in a Special Session. There are multiple smart economic types out there who have written in some detail on what a real fix might look like, and none of them came up with this. Frankly, if I’m John McCain sitting in one of my houses right now, I’m definitely thinking that the Hail Mary play here was to blow the whole Paulson plan up — not just go through the theater.

Tags:

About the Author ()

"You don't make progress by standing on the sidelines, whimpering and complaining. You make progress by implementing ideas." -Shirley Chisholm

Comments (2)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Unstable Isotope says:

    I do not understand how this insurance thing would work. The problem is that banks do not know the value of the mortgages they hold, how will they value them for insurance?

  2. cassandra_m says:

    That is one problem, I think. If these MBS’ are already high risk assets then a real premium on them ought to be pretty high, which isn’t going to be much incentive to hang on to those securities. If the premium is just set low, then you’ve created an under the table way to pass throw more government money to these firms — because you know that the premiums won’t cover the total risk and the taxpayers will be holding the bag. Plus, the government already insures FHA loans and has taken over Fannie and Freddie quite guaranteeing those loans. Why bother with more unregulated insurance?