Read All About It In the Sunday Papers-June 14 Edition

Filed in National by on June 14, 2009

Lead Story: Al Jazeera: Post-Election Rioting in Tehran

Recommended not just for the lead story, but also for the linked stories. Though it’s not what ‘bulo wants to believe, it appears at least possible that Ahmadinejad won fair and square:

Commenting on the dispute, Mehran Kamrava, director of the centre for international and regional studies at Georgetown University’s campus in Qatar, told Al Jazeera that Iranian elections are “notoriously unpredictable”.

“The Western media has been talking to people in north Tehran, who tend to vote overwhelmingly against Ahmadinejad,” he told Al Jazeera.

“But let’s not forget that many of the urban Iranians have priorities and proclivities that are not necessarily reflected in other areas of the main cities, and those people could easily have voted for Ahmadinejad.

The (UK) Economist: How the Rain Forest Might (Or Might Not) Be Saved

A brilliant in-depth briefing on the status, history and possible future of the Amazon Rain Forest. Must-reading for both those with an acute understanding of the issues and especially for those (like ‘bulo) with only a passing understanding of all the forces at play here. Here’s, in part, what created the problem in the first place:

All these places are part of the Amazon rainforest, an area one-and-a-half times the size of India, or nearly eight times the size of Texas. Most of it lies within Brazil. It is home to 20m Brazilians, or 10% of the country’s population. Many of them live a hardscrabble existence in places that are hot, wet, often disease-ridden and sometimes dangerous. These people have gone from being heroes who answered the government’s call to populate and subdue an empty region, to environmental criminals who are wrecking the planet, all the while standing on the same spot and doing what they have done for decades.

No government would think of condemning so many voters to persistent poverty in the name of saving trees. Moving them is impractical and would be unjust, since the state moved them in the first place, under a policy that began in the 1960s and lasted for 20 years. (Other institutions helped too; the World Bank provided a loan that financed a large migration from the south of the country to Rondônia state in the days before it cared about greenery.) A vast migration was accomplished with promises of free land, subsidies and a slightly menacing marketing campaign that exhorted people to ocupar para não entregar (“occupy it or lose it”). Parts of Brazil’s government still fret that covetous foreign powers may try to annexe the Amazon forest unless the country can find something useful to do with it.

Finding another way to assist this impoverished population earn a living is essential in any solution:

Efforts to commercialise forest products, from Amazon river fish to oils for use in cosmetics, are also under way. Amigos da Terra, in a study of these businesses, finds them to be profitable when they form clusters and turn out finished products. “I am convinced that in 20 years we will have a viable forest economy,” says Mr Smeraldi. “Only by then we will have lost a lot of forest.”

Speeding up this process is one of the motives behind the $1 billion donation for the Amazon announced in September by Norway’s government. The Brazilian government has set up an Amazon Fund for this money and any future donations. Norway will have no say in how it is used, but the amount of money it releases from the fund will be linked to Brazil’s success in slowing deforestation. Germany will give something to the fund too. Turid Rodrigues Eusébio, Norway’s ambassador to Brasília, says lots of other countries are watching Norway to see how the experiment goes, and will chip in if it is a success.

The Beast Who Slumbers encourages you to read the whole thing to develop an understanding of this essential issue.

Washington Post: The Untimely (It Should’ve Happened Much Earlier) Demise of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld

A detailed and fascinating account of Rumsfeld’s last days as Defense Secretary, and a recounting of the latter portion of his disastrous reign:

Even with the heated speculation about Rumsfeld before the elections, the defense secretary’s exit stunned Washington. In bearing the brunt of attacks for the administration’s conduct of the Iraq war, Rumsfeld had to some extent shielded Bush from criticism. His departure confirmed what a damaging political liability he had become, although Bush was still unwilling to concede publicly that his defense secretary had made serious mistakes. To the contrary, the president praised Rumsfeld for having been “a superb leader during a time of change.”

Many of Rumsfeld’s friends were offended by the White House’s seemingly rushed and unceremonious handling of the announcement of Rumsfeld’s resignation. To his supporters, the day-after news conference — which concluded with the defense secretary being patted on the shoulder as Bush ushered him out of the Oval Office — was insensitive and unbefitting of Rumsfeld’s long career of public service.

To others, though, the end of Rumsfeld’s tenure came too late. A number of Republican lawmakers complained bitterly that Bush had not cut Rumsfeld loose before the election, when the move might have provided a boost at the polls for some GOP candidates. While presidential aides had anticipated some gripes about the timing, the extent of the anger within party ranks surprised them.

Good stuff from Bradley Graham, not the hatchet job you might expect or that, frankly, Rumsfeld deserves. Although the truth is more than damning enough.

NYTimes: Feuding Bank Regulators Key to Obama Policy

If the Beast Who Slumbers had a dog in this fight, it’d be Sheila Bair, Chair of the FDIC:

At a public meeting three weeks ago, John C. Dugan, the comptroller of the currency, blasted a proposal to impose stiff new insurance fees on banks as unfair to the largest banks, which he regulates. The financial crisis stemmed in part from problems at small banks, he insisted.

Sheila C. Bair, chairwoman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the regulator for many smaller, community banks, could barely hide her contempt. The large banks, she said, had wreaked havoc on the system, only to be bailed out by “hundreds of billions, if not trillions, in government assistance.” She added, “Fairness is always an issue.”

Check out the photo of the two feuding bureacrats that accompanies this article, and one is reminded of Keith Jackson, “Whoa, Nellie, these two flat-out just don’t like each other.”

LATimes: Scientists Scramble to Save World’s Wheat from ‘Stem Rust’

Up to 80% of the world’s wheat could be wiped out if scientists can’t develop strain-resistant wheat:

Crop scientists fear the Ug99 fungus could wipe out more than 80% of worldwide wheat crops as it spreads from eastern Africa. It has already jumped the Red Sea and traveled as far as Iran. Experts say it is poised to enter the breadbasket of northern India and Pakistan, and the wind will inevitably carry it to Russia, China and even North America — if it doesn’t hitch a ride with people first.        

“It’s a time bomb,” said Jim Peterson, a professor of wheat breeding and genetics at Oregon State University in Corvallis. “It moves in the air, it can move in clothing on an airplane. We know it’s going to be here. It’s a matter of how long it’s going to take.”

Though most Americans have never heard of it, Ug99 — a type of fungus called stem rust because it produces reddish-brown flakes on plant stalks — is the No. 1 threat to the world’s most widely grown crop.

 

 Paging UI for scientific analysis… 

The (UK) Independent: Celebrities We Love to Hate

A veddy British take on loathsome celebrities both talented and famous.  Here’s a taste for all you hatas out there:

Cristiano Ronaldo: The epitome of the loathsome genius, Ronaldo is a legend on the pitch and legendarily off-putting off it. Preening, arrogant, a serial dater of vacuous blondes and incapable of looking after a £200,000 Ferrari without trashing it. A man of whom it can only be said: it’s a good job you’re pretty.

And, with this look at deserved celebrityhood, ‘bulo signs off for this week with this plea: Don’t hate bulo just because he’s brilliant at what he does. Brilliant people need love, too. And some can’t afford to pay for it.

Tags:

About the Author ()

Comments (13)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

Sites That Link to this Post

  1. Read All About It In the Sunday Papers-June 14 Edition « Nhan Images | June 14, 2009
  1. We don’t hate ‘Bulo because he’s brilliant.

    Juan Cole debunks the Al Jazeera article.

    Khatami received 70 percent of the vote in 1997. He then got 78% of the vote in 2001, despite a crowded field. In 2000, his reform movement captured 65% of the seats in parliament. He is a nice man, but you couldn’t exactly categorize him as a union man or a special hit with farmers.

    The evidence is that in the past little over a decade, Iran’s voters had become especially interested in expanding personal liberties, in expanding women’s rights, and in a wider field of legitimate expression for culture (not just high culture but even just things like Iranian rock music). The extreme puritanism of the hardliners grated on people.

    But in 2000, it was clear that the hard liners only had about 20% of the electorate on their side.

    But Ahmadinejad’s 2005 victory was made possible by the widespread boycott of the vote or just disillusionment in the reformist camp, meaning that fewer youth and women bothered to come out.

    So to believe that the 20% hard line support of 2001 has become 63% in 2009, we would have to posit that Iran is less urban, less literate and less interested in cultural issues today than 8 years ago. We would have to posit that the reformist camp once again boycotted the election and stayed home in droves.

    No, this is not a north Tehran/ south Tehran issue. Khatami won by big margins despite being favored by north Tehran.

    I’ve been seeing evidence appearing on the internet of vote tampering, but its sourcing is not clear. We’re only now getting scattered reports out of Iran because the government started shutting off internet and social media. However, I find it really difficult to believe people turn out in 85% to vote for an incumbent.

    OK, now I have to go read about stem rust.

  2. No link for LATimes article?

  3. Wow, that Ug99 sounds like really bad news. I’m not sure what you can say about it, it’s one of those continuing struggles of man against nature and how nature usually wins in the end. The fungus was able to reproduce sexually and that makes it quite difficult to fight. Developing new resistant strains will be quite difficult. I just hope they are able to keep it under control, otherwise there could be a crop collapse.

  4. Art Downs says:

    Who really cares about these people and wants to read about their exploits? What sort of person buys those tabloids that pay the paparazzi who follow them about?

    I would rather share some brewskis with members of the DL contingent and argue issues than suffer proximity to overly-worshipped twits.

    I cannot bring myself to hate these allegedly ‘beautiful’ people. Indifference is a healthier attitude.

    They may also be intellectual black holes that such brain cells from all who cross their orbits.
    o

  5. jason330 says:

    I hate ot say I told you so, but…

    You don’t need to go around searching for proof that Bush was not a good President. The evidence, as El Som points out, is all around us.

    Uhg-99,

    I wheat famine would be horrible, but isn’t the history of agriculture the history of wheat, rice, corn, soybeans and potatoes trading and retrading the top spot?

  6. Corrected, UI, thanks for the heads-up. The LA Times link now appears.

    And here’s another article from the New Yorker’s Laura Secor arguing that the Iranian election was stolen:

    http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2009/06/laura-secor-irans-stolen-election.html

  7. flutecake says:

    Stealing elections: another example of things that dubya has a lot to answer for.

    Bah.

    It worked so well in the US, why not in Iran for Mr. I’m-a-dinner-jacket.

  8. cassandra_m says:

    Gary Sick (another serious Iran observer) has a great post analyzing the election coup and timeline. He also notes that for the Iranian Revolutionary government to suddenly need to steal an election is a marked change in their attitude towards their citizens and government.

  9. flutecake says:

    Gary Sick, yes, author of “October Surprise”, wrote what we should have heeded in Aug. 2000,

    “…former General Colin Powell says that Cheney directed that plans be drawn up for the use of nuclear weapons in the battle to oust Iraqi troops from Kuwait. “The results unnerved me,” Powell wrote in his memoir: “An American Journey.” “To do serious damage to just one armored division dispersed in the desert would require a considerable number of small tactical nuclear weapons. I showed this analysis to Cheney and then had it destroyed.” Powell also said Cheney was upset that Powell asked whether it was worth going to war to liberate Kuwait. “Stick to military matters,” Cheney said, according to Powell.

    In February 1991, as the bombing campaign against Iraq was underway, Cheney said in an ABC interview that the allies might plan to maintain an embargo against Iraq even after the fighting ends: “The world has a long-term interest in seeing to it that Saddam Hussein is never able to do this again.” Sanctions may be needed “based on an international effort to deny him the ability to rebuild that military force that he’s used against his neighbors.” – end quote.

    http://www.iranian.com/Opinion/2000/August/Cheney/index.html

  10. Ugh, I totally hate the celebrity/gossip mag thing. I think I must be in the minority. They don’t put science magazines or political ones on the grocery store shelves.

  11. Those were both great links provided by Cassandra and ‘Bulo. I urge anyone interested in the Iran situation to read them. This is an interesting quote, from the Gary Sick article:

    All of this had the appearance of a well orchestrated strike intended to take its opponents by surprise – the classic definition of a coup. Curiously, this was not a coup of an outside group against the ruling elite; it was a coup of the ruling elite against its own people.

  12. Unless (until?) wheat becomes extinct, there’ll always be room in ‘bulo’s world for bread and circuses.

    At least, as long as Jennifer Aniston is not mentioned…