One of our resident bigotted, bible thumping, Clinton and the Dem’s do it too trolls, aka Republican David, David A. or whatever website he is trying to get readers to click on made this comment yesterday:
This is the norm, why do you act surprised? People who cheer a point of view expressed are just as valid as those who express it. Likewise those who jeer it after it had a chance to be expressed are valid expressions. Claire McCaskill had an interesting town hall on live television. I did not have a chance to watch most of it. People had exchanges with her. It was not a bad event. She got booed after she tried to mislead people on abortion funding (by saying the bill does not address it when she knows that the panel would be appointed by pro-abortion funders) and skip a real answer to the question. They pinned her down until she promised not to support it.
It looked like something that was a worthy exercise of citizenship.
I’m sure David has the specific bill and specific language to support this half baked claim. Or maybe he got in a forwarded email. Either way I had this to say:
Comment by on 11 August 2009 at 9:51 pm:
She got booed after she tried to mislead people on abortion funding (by saying the bill does not address it when she knows that the panel would be appointed by pro-abortion funders)
Hey dopey? Link please. Which Bill? support your “fact”.
thank you.
Now you and I both know David is on this site almost as much the other nutjob that has a pilot’s license. Shockingly I haven’t heard from David. But, is anyone else with me in having David provide the link where he got this information and until he does, he can’t comment on here?
You see, it is very tiring trying to quell all of the lies out there and Protack and David are two of the biggest misinformed commenters. I personally am fine with Protack burying his political career and one stupid comment after another is just another nail in the republican party coffin. But David, he loves rewriting the forwarded email “facts” he gets no doubt on a daily basis. hmmmm I wonder if he got this information from CRI? Come to think of it, I wonder how much info from CRI David is already using over here.
Either way, I think David still needs to provide links to his claim. I’ll hold my breath…