Dave Burris Is Back… And He’s Not Happy
Dave Burris has returned to blogging. Check out his new site here. Like I said at his new place… you don’t know what you had ’til it’s gone. And while I rarely agreed with Dave, he made me think. Delaware Politics has become wingnut central – Be honest, Dave, how irritated are you that you gave them that name?
I wish you good luck, and plan on visiting often. You never know when you just might need a liberal’s help!
Welcome back.
Tags: Delaware Blogosphere
Be honest, Dave, how irritated are you that you gave them that name?
He owned it, but the intellect behind the name was someone else’s! Whatever, that baby left home and has a life of its own now.
I’m not sure why we should read the website of a commie lib.
Well, we know he respects Gerald Hocker and he respects Monsignor Lavelle.
He called me a liar for pointing out that Hocker had signed on as a sponsor to a bill that would’ve given grocery stores (Hocker owns two) the right to sell liquor. He called me a liar for pointing out that Lavelle conspired with the Catholic Diocese to delay and ultimately deny justice for victims of institutional pedophilia.
So, when the Brett Favre of the Blogosphere comes out of retirement for the umpteenth time and proclaims that he’s ‘through with labels’, does that mean that he will no longer label someone a liar for providing fact-based narratives?
If not, El Burrito Junior is the same phony he’s always been. Let’s just see how long it takes for him to prove it.
Wee! El Som missed him, too! I can feel it…FEEL that love tonight!
😉
Well, I went over there. Also to the other place. And I saw y’all had all peed on the gate.
Don’t any of you have annoying relatives? Why talk to crazies you’re not assigned?
I like Dave a lot. He is smart and funny and sane for a Republican. When he called into the radio show that I was on with Tyler Nixon – it was like somebody suddenly threw open a window.
But I’m a little pessimistic about him being able to live up to the high aspirations of his new blog. He still can’t admit that voting for Bush was a mistake and that sort of putting the part above the country is the very essence of rank partisanship.
I’m too busy to watch the wacko blogs, but someone sent me this:
http://www.redstate.com/mbecker908/2009/10/31/obama-goes-to-dover/
Can we expect the same froth from Burris?
Not that I’m taking requests, but I did write this the other day.
Who are those people?
Boogeymen, Brooke, all boogeymen.
Brooke, ever watch a cat play with a mouse? I think we’re seeing a little of that here. Except both sides think they are the cat. ;o)
There are NO “good” republicans .They do not beleive that everyone is equal. Have you ever met a republican that did ANYTHING for anyone other than a blood relative or friend ? They beleive in “survival of the fitest”. Ive got mine screw the rest of you.If you dont have health insurance its your own dam fault. Dont expect me to pay for it.
Who is Dave Burris?
capesdelaware – that’s about as small minded as the people you condone.
You do know the word “condone” means “silently approve” don’t you?
Really, I’m trying to keep up, but between posts that are about a slew of people I hope never to meet, and language that was all written on the other side of the looking glass, I sometimes find it difficult to identify a thought.
See, I’m new here. I’m assuming thought might be involved.
Hang in there, Brooke. It becomes easier.
I don’t know under what conditions it would become easier to understand words used with the opposite of both their connotative and denotative meanings. My vocabulary has a head-start in accuracy.
Actually, that doesn’t get easier. I can’t condone poor language skills. 🙂 Learning who’s who in the DE blogosphere will come in time.
Brooke I think you will find our vocabulary is perfectly cromulent.
“Have you ever met a republican that did ANYTHING for anyone other than a blood relative or friend ?”
Yes, many. Next question?
“Don’t any of you have annoying relatives? Why talk to crazies you’re not assigned?”
Because they’re not as annoying as the relatives.
A lot of us are the crazy relative.
“A lot of us are the crazy relative.”
LOL THAT part, I suspected. 😀