More House Prefiles

Filed in Delaware by on January 10, 2010

This adds to the discussion started on legislation that has been prefiled for this session.

  • HB 300 proposed by Representative Brad Bennett has been prefiled and it establishes a 10-day response window to respond to FOIA requests. If the public body can’t respond to a request within 10 days for certain reasons — “voluminous records, requires legal advice or a public record is in storage or archived” — they can take the additional time with some notice to the requestor.

The bill currently has 21 House co-sponsors (Bennett, Scott, Brady, Carson, Cathcart, Hocker, Hudson, Jaques, Q. Johnson, Kovach, Kowalko, Lavelle, Longhurst, Manolakos, Miro, Mitchell, Oberle, Ramone, Schwartzkopf, D. Short, Walls, D. Williams) and nine Senate co-sponsors (Sokola, Bonini, Bushweller, Peterson, Booth, Cloutier, Connor, McBride, Sorenson), has been assigned to the House Administration Committee.

This bill seems like a no-brainer — giving entities subject to FOIA a time limit to respond gives FOIA requests a reasonable priority in the daily business of that entity and partially closes a loophole that lets an agency deal these requests to the bottom of the deck. It would be good if an entity that is taking the extra time under the allowed conditions above has to tell the FOIA requester exactly why their request is being extended (rather than just a notice), but that is a quibble for a good bill.

  • HB 298 proposed by Representative Miro prohibits the use of cell phones in a vehicle while that vehicle is in motion.  It adds a $50 fine for the first offense and a $110 fine for the second.   Law enforcement personnel are exempted while working as are school bus drivers.  (school bus drivers are subject to other law that also makes it illegal for them to use cell phones while the bus is operating, but has some exemptions for work reasons)

Current sponsors include Rep. Miro & Sen. Sokola; Reps. Hudson and Lavelle.

Both Wilmington and Elsmere have hands free cell operation requirements now. I know that the Wilmington law also bans texting while the vehicle is moving too. HB 298 does not specifically deal with texting. If this law goes into effect, then I think only Pennsylvania will be our only neighbor with no cell phone ban. Frankly I think that the fines need to be higher to make any real dent in people’s behavior, but it will be interesting to see the commentary around this.

Tags: , ,

About the Author ()

"You don't make progress by standing on the sidelines, whimpering and complaining. You make progress by implementing ideas." -Shirley Chisholm

Comments (10)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. anon says:

    The Federal FOIA window is 15 days which seems a little more reasonable.

    HB 298 proposed by Representative Miro prohibits the use of cell phones in a vehicle while that vehicle is in motion

    Even hands-free use?

    Law enforcement personnel are exempted

    Why? Is it dangerous or not? If it is dangerous, it is dangerous for LE too.

  2. Mike Matthews says:

    More nanny-statism from elected officials re: cell phones.

    Wilmington City Councilman Martelli (a retired cop!!) made an impassioned plea against Wilmington’s ordinance. Yes, a COP! He actually did some research and revealed that MORE accidents are caused by people eating in their cars, but where’s the law against that? See here for an excellent review Tyler Nixon wrote last year.

    http://delawarelibertarian.blogspot.com/2009/08/23-minutes-of-debate-ny-times-article.html

  3. cassandra m says:

    Hands free is fine — no handheld phones.

    And for the FOIA thing, it seems important to have a clear response window, but 10 days seems reasonable for such a small place.

  4. Mike Matthews says:

    What fascinates me about this topic is there really are some “good liberals” on City Council. The type that I would [rightfully] expect to bitch and moan about civil liberties violations if the offender were, say, George W. Bush.

    The best part of Tyler’s post was his dissecting Loretta Walsh’s justifications. Loretta is normally a politician with whom I agree on 99% of the issues. A real dyed-in-the-wool liberal I can stand behind. But I don’t know what the hell she was smoking on this one. Embarrassing vote and even more embarrassing defense on her part.

  5. jason330 says:

    I say “no eating while driving” should be next up.

  6. Mike Matthews says:

    Then everyone will go to the doctor’s to be diagnosed diabetec.

  7. jason330 says:

    Why diabetics are allowed to drive is beyond me.

  8. Brooke says:

    Um, it doesn’t say “no use by driver”. It says, “no use.”

  9. cassandra m says:

    Good liberals on City Council? Surely you jest! They get to be good liberals when they figure out how to get a more liberal agenda out of Mayor Baker.

  10. Brian Shields says:

    If they ban eating while driving I will starve. Fast food industry will be up in arms, 50-75% of all of their business is drive through related. There is no driving on cell phones industry.