Monthly Archives: March 2010

Radio Ad — Call Mike Castle Hands Off Our Healthcare!

Good job!

I heard this ad during Al Mascitti’s show Friday AM — it is a good reminder that Mike Castle is spending his days in DC voting for the interests of his party and for those of various lobbyists.

[quicktime]https://delawareliberal.net//wp-content/uploads/2010/03/CastleVoteNoHealthCare032610.mp3[/quicktime]

It’s a good idea for Delawareans to remind him that we are still here, so calling him to say Hands Off is a good idea. If you’re lucky, you’ll catch the office on recess from John Boehner’s Congressional Vote Re-Education Camp.

The Nexus of Wingnut

Get ready everyone for Kookapocalypse Now! Well, OK, not now. Actually, April 7. That’s when former Governor, former VP candidate, and current Queen of the Tea Baggers Sarah Palin will host a fundraiserfor Minnesota Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann. Yup. That’s right. Palin and Bachmann will be together in the same room. Physicists at CERN are concerned that the extreme concentration of what they refer to as “Batsh!t Crazy” (their words, not mine) in one place could cause irreparable damage to the space-time continuum. On the other hand, it’s possible I made that last part up.

The rest of it, however, is frighteningly, but fascinatingly, true. As a matter of fact, not only can you attend the dinner at the Hilton Hotel in Minneapolis for the low price of only $500 (or $5000 for a table of ten), you can also have a “Private Reception with Photo Opportunity”. This would take place in the Champagne Room at the same event and could be yours for only $10,000. In all fairness, the $10,000 price is for a couple, and does include the dinner. So you got that goin’ for you.

If you don’t have $10k laying around to blow on a snapshot, you can visit this site  hosted by Tarryl Clark, Bachmann’s Democratic opponent. At the cleverly-named mytengrandphoto.com, you can create your own picture with Bachmann, Palin, or both. This way, you can have your own budget-conscious way to commemorate the Kookapocalypse. (Also, I dare you to say “Kookapocalypse” out loud without smiling.)

Another Fracture in the GOP Wall

This time TalkingPointsMemo documents the infighting:

For Republican candidates across the country, the movement du jour seems to be a pledge to repeal health care reform if elected. Republicans are rushing to co-sponsor and promote efforts to repeal the bill on Capitol Hill. But not everyone is biting, exposing another fissure between the GOP’s right and far-right.

The latest GOPers caught in the mix are in Delaware — with candidate Christine O’Donnell (R-DE) challenging Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE) to sign on to repeal plans. Castle, like every single Congressional Republican, opposed the legislation. But he said that repealing “is not realistic.”

Even DelawarePolitics.net (in their capacity as unpaid PR arm of the Christine O’Donnell campaign) gets quoted from Christine’s press release:

But according to DelawarePolitics.net, O’Donnell charges that by not signing, Castle is “breaking faith with the people of Delaware and America in refusing to support the conservative-led effort to repeal ObamaCare, a totally disastrous and unconstitutional health bill.”

There’s more spats at the link, but one thing that TPM missed was that Castle made his decision to not repeal the Affordable Care Act conditional on Democrats still controlling government. Apparently he would be on board with rolling back a new regulatory regime on insurance companies as well as expanded coverage for Americans if Republicans were in charge.

Unfortunately for Christine, it is a safe bet that Mike Castle probably doesn’t even know she has issued this challenge to him — it seems a safe bet that given the messy way she seems to occupy the political space, Castle and his people (and the entire State R Party, I’d bet) have pretty much decided that they can safely ignore her.

(Thanks to Jason330 for the h/t!)

Friday Open Thread

Welcome to Friday of what has been both a weird and wonderful week. I hope you have awesome weekend plans! What’s on your mind? Let’s get this open thread spinning.

Before you feel too sorry for the newly-purged conservative David Frum, take a look at this blast from the past (written by Frum in 2003).

You may know the names of these antiwar conservatives. Some are famous: Patrick Buchanan and Robert Novak. Others are not: Llewellyn Rockwell, Samuel Francis, Thomas Fleming, Scott McConnell, Justin Raimondo, Joe Sobran, Charley Reese, Jude Wanniski, Eric Margolis, and Taki Theodoracopulos.

The antiwar conservatives aren’t satisfied merely to question the wisdom of an Iraq war. Questions are perfectly reasonable, indeed valuable. There is more than one way to wage the war on terror, and thoughtful people will naturally disagree about how best to do it, whether to focus on terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda and Hezbollah or on states like Iraq and Iran; and if states, then which state first?

But the antiwar conservatives have gone far, far beyond the advocacy of alternative strategies. They have made common cause with the left-wing and Islamist antiwar movements in this country and in Europe. They deny and excuse terror. They espouse a potentially self-fulfilling defeatism. They publicize wild conspiracy theories. And some of them explicitly yearn for the victory of their nation’s enemies.

He was for purging before he was against it. One thing to remember, Frum is not some George H.W. Bush exile – he was George W. Bush’s speechwriter and wrote the infamous “axis of evil” speech.

President Obama also had good news on the international front this week. He announced that the U.S. and Russia have agreed to a new START treaty:

Shortly after concluding a phone call with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev, President Obama made a surprise visit to the White House briefing room to hail the new arms control agreement with Russia, replacing the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) treaty that expired on December 5th.

“I’m pleased to announce that after a year of intense negotiations, the United States and Russia have agreed to the most comprehensive arms control agreement in nearly two decades,” the president said from the press podium.

“It cuts – by about a third – the nuclear weapons that the United States and Russia will deploy,” Obama said describing the agreement. “It significantly reduces missiles and launchers. It puts in place a strong and effective verification regime. And it maintains the flexibility that we need to protect and advance our national security, and to guarantee our unwavering commitment to the security of our Allies.”

Experts say that domestic policy success also leads to international success. That makes sense because losing makes you look weak and winning makes you look strong. President Obama looked strong, and it will only lead to more success.

Why Yes, I Do Intend To Document Every Incident

Here’s the latest: (Via Think Progress)

After picking up his 10-year old daughter from school yesterday afternoon, Nashville resident Mark Duren was driving home when he was suddenly and intentionally rammed from behind by Harry Weisiger. Enraged at the sight of Duren’s Obama bumper sticker, Weisiger gave Duren “the bird” and then hit him from behind, leading to a violent series of events. Nashville’s WKRN reports:

“He pointed at the back of my car,” Duren said, “the bumper, flipped me off, one finger salute.”

But it didn’t end there.

Duren told News 2 that Weisiger honked his horn at him for awhile, as Duren stopped at a stop sign.

Once he started driving again, down Blair Boulevard, towards his home, he said, “I looked in the rear view mirror again, and this same SUV was speeding, flying up behind me, bumped me.”

Duren said he applied his brake and the SUV smashed into the back of his car.

He then put his car in park to take care of the accident, but Weisiger started pushing the car using his SUV.

Duren said, “He pushed my car up towards the sidewalk, almost onto the sidewalk.”

But I guess it was Duren’s fault because his Obama bumper sticker intentionally provoked Weisiger.  I also guess the 10 year old in the car will be labeled as “collateral damage.”

Digby explains and gives examples:

I can hardly believe it, but apparently America’s wife beaters have actually decided to use the defense that these Democrats are “asking for” death threats from the right wingers because they are “making them mad.” I documented Sere and Cantor’s warnings this morning, but there are more:

Breitbart: Congressional Black Caucus members went “searching for … racism” by walking through Tea Party crowd

Graham tells Beck — Beck! — Tea Partiers “get mad” because they “don’t like being called racist

Michael Graham: Pelosi was “asking for” response by carrying Medicare gavel

Rove warns Dems that discussing threats against them may “inflame emotions”

Bet the wife beaters are taking notes.

Insurance Commissioner is Failing Aggrieved Patients

That title is stolen from the News Journal Opinion page today, whose writers I have to give some credit to today. And the Insurance Commissioner in question is our own Karen Weldin Stewart.

They highlight an odd bit of business, where Senator John D. Rockefeller, D-W.V has written to Delaware Blue Cross to ask them to provide detailed documentation of why they would deny cardiac testing prescribed by doctors to patients exhibiting symptoms of heart failure.

In the letter to Timothy Constantine, BCBSD’s chief executive officer, Rockefeller asked for information on procedures used to evaluate requests for the advanced stress tests and probed the insurer’s contract relationship with a Tennessee company, MedSolutions, that handles claims submitted in advance of the tests.

Rockefeller asked BCBSD to provide the material to the committee by April 16, including the amount of pre-authorization requests for diagnostic heart tests BCBSD has received in the last five years, how many it has approved, and how many it has denied.

Prior to Senator Rockefeller’s request, the News Journal itself did some detailed reporting on others in Delaware being denied these tests earlier this week and it took a US Senator — one not from Delaware, mind you — to ask enough questions to get BCBSD to actually call off these denials.

Where’s our IC? She claims to have gotten one complaint only and also doesn’t want to talk about this issues citing privacy issues. Except there have been multiple people who have been denied these tests who were willing to go on the record with the News Journal. The NJ OpEd:

It appears Commissioner Weldin-Stewart has dropped the ball here.

There has been plenty of information published, with input from physicians and patients, none of whom seem overly worried about violating their own privacy.

They simply want answers, which is what the insurance commissioner should be seeking.

It’s a bit disconcerting that a U.S. Senate committee is jumping into this fray while the state’s insurance commissioner continues to seek more information before beginning a full investigation.

Exactly. When the local paper and a US Senator are doing more to address a problem with an insurer in Delaware than the person who is paid taxpayer dollars to address these issues, I’ve got to ask — again — what this IC is actually doing for people in this state.

Student Loan Reform

Somewhat overshadowed by all the attention on the health care reform bill was the student loan overhaul that was added into the reconciliation package:

Ending one of the fiercest lobbying fights in Washington, Congress voted Thursday to force commercial banks out of the federal student loan market, cutting off billions of dollars in profits in a sweeping restructuring of financial-aid programs and redirecting most of the money to new education initiatives.

It’s been lost in the bank bailout fight, but the U.S. government has been sending money to banks for years to give out student loans.

Since the bank-based loan program began in 1965, commercial banks like Sallie Mae and Nelnet have received guaranteed federal subsidies to lend money to students, with the government assuming nearly all the risk. Democrats have long denounced the program, saying it fattened the bottom line for banks at the expense of students and taxpayers.

The overhaul cuts out the middleman and makes the federal government the direct lender. This change will save us money and help more people who want to go to college.

The Congressional Budget Office said the direct-lending approach would save taxpayers about $61 billion over 10 years. Roughly $40 billion of the savings will be redirected to higher education. Education programs will get an additional $10 billion from the health care package.

The bill includes some landmark changes, like automatic increases, tied to inflation, in the maximum Pell grant award. But for individual students, the increase in the maximum Pell grant — to $5,900 in 2019-20 from $5,550 for the 2010-11 school year — is minuscule, compared with the steep, inexorable rise in tuition for public and private colleges alike.

One of the biggest student loan servicers, Sallie Mae, has a branch in Delaware. Mike Castle was against the student loan overhaul, citing Delaware jobs as one of his reasons.

Rep. Mike Castle, R-Del., who voted against both the House health care reform and student loan bills, said he will oppose the new legislation, describing the ending of subsidies as “government-controlled student lending” and saying “the change would also eliminate hundreds of jobs for Delawareans, and tens of thousands of jobs across the country, in the middle of a harsh economy.”

The next time you hear Mike Castle whining about “government spending,” “bank bailouts” or “wasted money” just remember that Castle supported giving government money to a private entity to pad their bottom line.

Both Ted Kaufman and Tom Carper voted for the student loan overhaul, despite Sallie Mae’s presence in the state.

Modified Reconciliation Fix Passes

The modified reconciliation fix has passed the House for the second time, 220-207. This means that the agreed-upon fixes agreed to by both the House and the Senate are now done.

I hope that Democrats have learned a lesson from this – if they stay together as a caucus and anticipate Republican tactics, they can prevail. Despite all the threats made by the Republicans, in the end the passage was anti-climactic.

This doesn’t mean that the fight is over. I think it’s just beginning. The bill does not spell out the enforcement mechanism, which will be written by the HHS. We’ll have to keep our eyes out to make sure that the regulations are written to favor consumers over insurers. There’s still the public option and Medicare buy-in.

What have we learned from this? In my case I’ve learned that real change is difficult, incredibly difficult and exhausting. You can’t give up and you can’t count on people to do the right thing without prodding. The most frustrating thing for me is practically having to beg our elected officials to do the right thing. Hopefully our elected officials have learned that nothing feels better than winning and will continue the streak.

There’s a huge downside, which is the behavior of the Republicans, especially the leadership. They settled on a strategy of failure for America and they’re sticking to it. They are happy to stir the fear and hatred of unhinged followers, as long as it benefits them. I’m hoping that this strategy bites them in the rear but it won’t as long as the media plays the false equivalence game.

Republicans Decide They’re The True Victims, And We’d Better Believe Them… Or Else!

Everyone else is simply “collateral damage” who need to understand how upset and angry they are, and how Dems brought all this on themselves.

Via Roll Call:

Tea party protesters are reportedly planning a protest at the home of Senate Parliamentarian Alan Frumin later this week, prompting Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance Gainer to work with local law enforcement officials to ensure Frumin’s safety.

But I guess this is okay since Democrats are the ones “fanning the flames” and victimizing poor Republicans.  And what is it with all the home visits?  Seriously, these people are out of control, and it’s a shame that Republican leadership is a-okay with it.

Obviously, given today’s GOP stance, I guess they decided… in for a penny, in for a pound.

Cantor:  “Legitimate threats should be treated as security issues, and they should be dealt with by the appropriate law enforcement officials,” Cantor said. “It is reckless to use these incidents as media vehicles for political gain. That is why I have deep concerns that — some [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee] chairman Chris Van Hollen and [Democratic National Committee] chairman Tim Kaine, in particular — are dangerously fanning the flames, by suggesting that these incidents be used as a political weapon.”

What is Cantor saying?  That Dems shouldn’t report or discuss acts of violence and death threats because it looks political?  And then there’s this:

National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Andy Sere said that while his organization doesn’t condone the actions of the person or people who cut a gas line at Perriello’s brother’s house (apparently under the impression that the home was the congressman’s), Perriello is not the victim.

“Central and Southside Virginians are the ones who are going to have the bear the burden of increased taxes,” Sere told The Roanoke Times. “What you’re seeing is a frustration among his constituents who believe he’s not listening to them.”

They so own this crap… and it seems they want to own it.

Thursday Open Thread

Welcome to Thursday. So far my day is going better than yesterday and catching up on sleep really helped with that. So, tell us, what’s on your mind? Open thread!

A win for the good guys! Jamie Leigh Jones gets her day in court, thanks to Senator Al Franken.

The Fifth Circuit eventually held that some of Jones’ claims did indeed belong in court because the assault was not related to her employment. KBR had appealed the decision to the Supreme Court, but after initial briefing, KBR withdrew its appeal on March 11.

Why? Sen. Al Franken! Franken successfully advocated a prohibition that keeps contractors receiving federal defense funds from forcing employees to arbitration to resolve certain claims, including civil rights and harassment disputes.

KBR spokesperson Heather Browne told the Blog of the Legal Times that the withdrawal was in fact related to the Franken amendment. Though they said they believe “that the language of the amendment is broad and vague,” they did not wish to run afoul of it.

Jones’ attorney said they are now preparing for trial.

Good news on the DADT front – Sec. Gates has announced changes in the way that the rule is enforced.

The changes raise the level of officer authorized to initiate a fact-finding inquiry into a case, the level of officer who can conduct an inquiry and of the one that can authorize a dismissal.

To discourage the use of overheard statements or hearsay, from now on any evidence given in third-party outings must be given under oath, Gates said. Cases of third-party outings also have included instances in which male troops have turned in women who rejected their romantic advances or jilted partners in relationship have turned in a former lover.

Some kinds of confidential information also will no longer be allowed, including statements gays make to their lawyers, clergy, psychotherapists or medical professionals in the pursuit of health care.

What about public announcements to the media – Lt. Dan Choi or cases like the enlisted woman who was turned in by cops when they found her D.C. marriage license?

The GOP Is Now Officially Guilty of Petulance

I think it was noted here somewhere the other day that on Tuesday, Senate Republicans used a little-known rule to prevent hearings from proceeding past 2:00 PM. In fact, our own beloved Sen. Carper was forced to halt a Senate Homeland Security Subcommittee hearing on transparency due to Republicans’ refusal to give unanimous consent to waiving the rule. (It goes without saying that they lack the self-awareness to realize they pivoted from crowing about government transparency, to stopping a hearing about transparency.)

Well, yesterday they were at it again at an even higher level of childishness. Within the same Senate rule that prohibits hearings from proceeding past 2:00 PM is another provision that prevents committees from meeting more than two hours after the Senate convenes. Again, this is a rule that is routinely waived every day without a second thought. Not now, though. Since the minority party refused to give consent to waive the rule, and the Senate convened for the day at 9:00 AM, all Senate committees were forced to end their meetings at 11:00. Among the committee hearings that were forced to end prematurely or be canceled were:

  • A Senate Homeland Security subcommittee session on “Contracts for Afghan National Police Training”
  • A Senate Armed Services Committee hearing regarding Korea, for which several high-ranking military commanders had traveled to DC from as far away as Japan.
  • A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing dealing with judicial nominations, and
  • A Veteran’s Affairs Committee hearing regarding helping homeless veterans.

Just close your eyes for a minute and imagine the outrage from the right if Democrats so much as showed up late for hearings about dealing with rogue nations or helping homeless vets. Liz Cheney and Marc Thiessen would have strokes trying to unleash their outrage. The word is that Republicans will continue to play these games all week.

I think there are two important lessons we can learn from these episodes (although we really should know this already): 1) the Republican Party has no interest in actual governing the country, and behaves like a bunch of children who were told they can’t have the candy from the checkout lane, and 2) it’s a disgrace that the United States Senate is so structured that a group such as 1) can bring it to a halt. If nothing else, I hope this add fire to the “Reform the Senate” movement. And also the “Don’t let the GOP back in charge” movement as well. What are the chances that the national media sufficiently calls out the GOP for their unbelievably childish and unprofessional behavior?

Legislative Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show-Thurs., March 25, 2010

Let’s start with yesterday’s Session (In)Activity Report. The General Assembly could have, and I think, should have, saved the State some money by, at most, holding one week of session from mid-March to the Easter break. The lack of activity does not justify 9 days of session. I understand why the action is relatively sparse–there’s no money. OK, then don’t hold as many session days. Save the per diem costs and even the mileage costs, and don’t hold session.

Here’s what little happened yesterday:

The Senate passed one bill of at least marginal substance. SB 157 (Peterson). And even this bill merely brings Delaware into conformity with Federal statute–“Consistent with federal law, this bill protects up to $125,000 of a debtor’s equity in their principal residential home in a bankruptcy proceeding.”

Some bills were released from committee, but the record is once again unreliable. Rep. B. Short’s bill regulating door-to-door solicitations was released from committee last week, but that didn’t stop Legislative Council from reporting that it was just released yesterday.

BTW, Legislative Council, the alleged ‘research’ arm of the General Assembly, is generally the repository for plum patronage spots for those with ‘special’ relationships with legislators. The sloppiness of the session reports simply reflects the disinterest with which many of them approach their jobs. If you are looking for legislative cost savings, Legislative Council is one place where you could save some serious $$’s.

I’ve padded the post-game show as much as I could. Let’s see what’s on the docket for today, shall we?

I don’t think I could make up a more pathetic agenda than today’s Senate Agenda.

And that’s with one substantive bill on it: SB 197 (Blevins), which creates the crime of strangulation as a stand-alone felony. Strangulation is often used in domestic violence incidents, and this bill seeks to address that. For those who are wondering, I checked and, no, John ‘Law-Abiding Citizen Since 2007’ Atkins is not a cosponsor. In that case, put me down as a ‘yes’ vote.

Of course, likely to receive the most attention is Rep. Hocker’s HB 203, which designates strawberries as Delaware’s Official Fruit. You know strawberries, ‘The Fruit of the Devil’, so named b/c they are so devilishly hard to pick. I am still waiting for Hocker’s bill to designate ‘migrant laborers’ as Delaware’s (or at least, Sussex County’s) Official Workforce. Perhaps he’ll sell them strawberries at cost in his stores since, you know, they picked them. Might want to do the same thing with chicken as well.

The House Agenda is far more interesting, albeit worrisome. No worries about HB 137 ( Rep. D. Short), which requires the IC to conduct random audits of insurance companies writing small business health policies.

However, Sen. DeLuca’s SB 60 is on the agenda, and it’s a bad bill pure and simple. A bad bill supported by the AG’s office. Memo to Beau Biden: This is precisely the kind of bleep that Jane Brady routinely pushed, i. e. minimum mandatory sentencing for non-violent drug offenders, and it led to disastrous fiscal and public policy consequences. If this Constitutional amendment passes two consecutive General Assemblies, every headlined crime in the paper, if papers are still around, will lead to emotion-driven legislation, the kind of bills that the weak-kneed in Dover dare not oppose. Been there, done that, don’t do that.

Unless Biden wants to go down the same path as Brady (and he might), he would do well to reconsider his support for this abomination.

I’ve previously discussed the other bills of interest on the agenda. As always, check ’em out as YMMV.

Sorry for the truncated report. On my way to work.