Mitt vs. Newt Fratricide will leave both unelectable

Filed in National by on December 8, 2011

This morning I was not very impressed with Mitt’s attack on Newt, but this afternoon’s stuff is much better than I even hoped.

Mitt’s team is going after Newt’s “erratic behavior” and stating flat out that Newt is “unfit to lead” and has a history of “irrational behavior that you do not want in the commander-in-chief.” It is tough stuff that will require Newt to climb down into the gutter.

Talent, who was a congressman under Newt’s leadership in the 1990s, named Newt’s erratic behavior as the primary reason Republicans ousted Newt from the speaker’s office after four years. “We also reached the conclusion after four years that we also could not go on with him as our leader,” Talent explained. “You were in a situation where you would get up in the morning, and you would have the to check the newspaper, the clippings, that was before the internet, to see what the speaker had said that day that you were going to have to clean up after in your own district and I again, I don’t like saying this, but it’s exactly why we did what we did.”

Sununu piled on after a question from Time’s Mark Halperin, asking whether they would be comfortable with Newt as commander-in-chief:

Let me answer that this way: having sat in the White House with a president that was completely reliable, understood completely the depths of which is required to make the kinds of hard decisions the President has to make, I strongly reinforce my endorsement of Mitt Romney as the right man there. The off-the-cuff for example that Gingrich throws out on occasion is a reflection of the off-the-cuff thinking that he goes through to deal with issues and that is not what you want in the commander-in-chief.

Sununu, who worked in President George H. W. Bush’s administration, then added that Newt displayed the “irrational behavior that you do not want in the commander-in-chief.”

The RWNJ who vote in the primaries want a “fighter” so in spite of Newt’s initial response that he will take the high road, I wouldn’t put money on that outcome. And even on the off chance that Newt can stick with his “high road” approach, the idea “irrational” unstable meme that will build up around Newt of the next few months feds directly into what voters already know about Newt – that he is an unsteady guy who left two wives and goes around saying crazy shit.

This ‘Newt can’t be trusted’ narrative ties in nicely to a second line of attack coming out of the Romney campaign: Newt’s opposition to Paul Ryan’s budget, specifically its central provision of turning Medicare into a private voucher system. Not only are they criticizing Newt for not jumping on the Paul Ryan bandwagon, but they are specifically calling out his comment that the plan was “right-wing social engineering” as evidence that his erratic behavior is dangerous to the conservative movement.

Who is the Libertarian Party’s candidate? Whoever it is might find themselves in second place after the dust settles on this GOP apocalypse.

About the Author ()

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

Comments (5)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Joe Cass says:

    Good times, real good times.

  2. walt says:

    You can stick a fork in Romney, because he’s pretty much done unless Newt steps on his fallus in a bad way in the next few months. Then it’ll be Newt vs. Obama. Interesting.

  3. jason330 says:

    Don’t count on it. The establishment Repugs hate Newt as much as the base hates Romney. I think we could be looking at a brokered convention with Guliani or Christie riding in as a the white knight.

    If Newt fails to win the nomination early all bets are off.

  4. Jason330 says:

    One more thing. A Ron Paul win in Iowa would be hilarious. The press would have to pretend that the state didn’t exist, and suddenly New Hampshire would be the “first real test for these campaigns.”

  5. bamboozer says:

    The Gipper is rolling in his grave at this point as the GOP candidates violate his famed rule about not talking bad about other Republicans. Whoever emerges will be damaged, they all are at this point. Brokered convention? Not likely, it would have a high negative factor and while I might buy Christie as a white buffalo he’s far too large for the horse imagery. But it won’t be Newt, his past remains an albatross around his fat neck and will sink him soon enough.